多囊卵巢综合征患者卵母细胞质量与卵胞浆内单精子注射周期临床结果的meta分析

Naiquan Duan, Hui Wang, Z. Niu, Yifan Guo, Shuling Wang, Yifan Liu, Bingsong Xu, Lin Zhao, Yuanqing Yao
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征患者卵母细胞质量与卵胞浆内单精子注射周期临床结果的meta分析","authors":"Naiquan Duan, Hui Wang, Z. Niu, Yifan Guo, Shuling Wang, Yifan Liu, Bingsong Xu, Lin Zhao, Yuanqing Yao","doi":"10.1166/jmihi.2018.2519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whether treatment outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles differ between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS patients remains inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in PCOS patients and non-PCOS patients\n undergoing ICSI procedure. Methods: Databases including Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to 18 January 2018. All articles searched were independently reviewed and selected by two evaluators according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion\n criteria. Results: Eight studies were selected for inclusion, and a total of 474 PCOS patients (627 cycles) were compared to age-matched controls (962 patients, 992 cycles). The total gonadotropin usage was significant less in PCOS group, and the MD was –481.72 IU [95% CI:–\n 603.76–359.68, P < 0.00001]. A significantly higher mean number of oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and 2-pronucleated (2PN) oocytes per cycle were observed in the PCOS group than in the non-PCOS group (P < 0.005), the total MDs were 4.20 [95% CI: 2.50–5.90],\n 1.52 [95% CI: 0.84–2.20] and 1.71 [95% CI: 0.73–2.69], respectively. The fertilization rate was comparable. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was higher in the PCOS group, the odd ratio (OR) was 1.59 [95% CI: 1.23–2.05, P < 0.005] and the live birth\n rate was comparable. A higher miscarriage rate was observed in the PCOS group, but this did not reach statistical significance. The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly higher in the PCOS group [OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.16–7.82, P < 0.05]. Conclusions:\n This meta-analysis demonstrated that PCOS patients may have more favourable ICSI outcomes than non-PCOS patients. Our findings should be evaluated in further prospective cohort studies.","PeriodicalId":49032,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-Analysis of Oocyte Quality and Clinical Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Naiquan Duan, Hui Wang, Z. Niu, Yifan Guo, Shuling Wang, Yifan Liu, Bingsong Xu, Lin Zhao, Yuanqing Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1166/jmihi.2018.2519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whether treatment outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles differ between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS patients remains inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in PCOS patients and non-PCOS patients\\n undergoing ICSI procedure. Methods: Databases including Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to 18 January 2018. All articles searched were independently reviewed and selected by two evaluators according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion\\n criteria. Results: Eight studies were selected for inclusion, and a total of 474 PCOS patients (627 cycles) were compared to age-matched controls (962 patients, 992 cycles). The total gonadotropin usage was significant less in PCOS group, and the MD was –481.72 IU [95% CI:–\\n 603.76–359.68, P < 0.00001]. A significantly higher mean number of oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and 2-pronucleated (2PN) oocytes per cycle were observed in the PCOS group than in the non-PCOS group (P < 0.005), the total MDs were 4.20 [95% CI: 2.50–5.90],\\n 1.52 [95% CI: 0.84–2.20] and 1.71 [95% CI: 0.73–2.69], respectively. The fertilization rate was comparable. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was higher in the PCOS group, the odd ratio (OR) was 1.59 [95% CI: 1.23–2.05, P < 0.005] and the live birth\\n rate was comparable. A higher miscarriage rate was observed in the PCOS group, but this did not reach statistical significance. The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly higher in the PCOS group [OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.16–7.82, P < 0.05]. Conclusions:\\n This meta-analysis demonstrated that PCOS patients may have more favourable ICSI outcomes than non-PCOS patients. Our findings should be evaluated in further prospective cohort studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2018.2519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1166/jmihi.2018.2519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)和非多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者的卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)周期治疗结果是否存在差异尚不明确。本荟萃分析的目的是比较接受ICSI手术的PCOS患者和非PCOS患者的卵母细胞质量和临床结果。方法:检索Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆等数据库,检索截至2018年1月18日发表的研究。所有检索到的文章均由两名评估员根据预定的纳入和排除标准进行独立审查和选择。结果:8项研究被纳入,共有474名PCOS患者(627个周期)与年龄匹配的对照组(962名患者,992个周期)进行了比较。PCOS组促性腺激素总用量显著低于PCOS组,MD为- 481.72 IU [95% CI: - 603.76 ~ 359.68, P < 0.00001]。PCOS组每周期平均卵母细胞、中期II (MII)卵母细胞和2-原核(2PN)卵母细胞数量显著高于非PCOS组(P < 0.005),总MDs分别为4.20 [95% CI: 2.50-5.90]、1.52 [95% CI: 0.84-2.20]和1.71 [95% CI: 0.73-2.69]。受精率是相当的。PCOS组每个移植周期的临床妊娠率较高,奇数比(OR)为1.59 [95% CI: 1.23-2.05, P < 0.005],活产率相当。PCOS组流产率较高,但差异无统计学意义。PCOS组发生卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)的风险明显高于PCOS组[OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.16 ~ 7.82, P < 0.05]。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,PCOS患者可能比非PCOS患者有更有利的ICSI结果。我们的发现应该在进一步的前瞻性队列研究中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Meta-Analysis of Oocyte Quality and Clinical Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles in Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Whether treatment outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles differ between polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS patients remains inconclusive. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare oocyte quality and clinical outcomes in PCOS patients and non-PCOS patients undergoing ICSI procedure. Methods: Databases including Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published up to 18 January 2018. All articles searched were independently reviewed and selected by two evaluators according to predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: Eight studies were selected for inclusion, and a total of 474 PCOS patients (627 cycles) were compared to age-matched controls (962 patients, 992 cycles). The total gonadotropin usage was significant less in PCOS group, and the MD was –481.72 IU [95% CI:– 603.76–359.68, P < 0.00001]. A significantly higher mean number of oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and 2-pronucleated (2PN) oocytes per cycle were observed in the PCOS group than in the non-PCOS group (P < 0.005), the total MDs were 4.20 [95% CI: 2.50–5.90], 1.52 [95% CI: 0.84–2.20] and 1.71 [95% CI: 0.73–2.69], respectively. The fertilization rate was comparable. The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer cycle was higher in the PCOS group, the odd ratio (OR) was 1.59 [95% CI: 1.23–2.05, P < 0.005] and the live birth rate was comparable. A higher miscarriage rate was observed in the PCOS group, but this did not reach statistical significance. The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly higher in the PCOS group [OR: 3.01, 95% CI: 1.16–7.82, P < 0.05]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that PCOS patients may have more favourable ICSI outcomes than non-PCOS patients. Our findings should be evaluated in further prospective cohort studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics
Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics (JMIHI) is a medium to disseminate novel experimental and theoretical research results in the field of biomedicine, biology, clinical, rehabilitation engineering, medical image processing, bio-computing, D2H2, and other health related areas. As an example, the Distributed Diagnosis and Home Healthcare (D2H2) aims to improve the quality of patient care and patient wellness by transforming the delivery of healthcare from a central, hospital-based system to one that is more distributed and home-based. Different medical imaging modalities used for extraction of information from MRI, CT, ultrasound, X-ray, thermal, molecular and fusion of its techniques is the focus of this journal.
期刊最新文献
Medical Imaging and Health Informatics Liver Cancer Detection and Classification Using Raspberry Pi A Rapid Dual Feature Tracking Method for Medical Equipments Assembly and Disassembly in Markerless Augmented Reality Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Signal Analysis for Abnormalities Detection Using Hybrid Cascade Feed Forward Backpropagation with Ant Colony Optimization Technique Volume Subtraction Method Using Dual Reconstruction and Additive Technique for Pulmonary Artery/Vein 3DCT Angiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1