开放空间:开放获取环境卫星数据的全球努力

Q3 Social Sciences Astropolitics Pub Date : 2018-09-02 DOI:10.1080/14777622.2018.1534470
Philipp Olbrich
{"title":"开放空间:开放获取环境卫星数据的全球努力","authors":"Philipp Olbrich","doi":"10.1080/14777622.2018.1534470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in the satellite-based remote sensing industry are evident in recent years. Formerly a domain reserved for the military and intelligence agencies of governments, there now exists a so-called geospatial revolution due to the ongoing commercialization of Earth observation (EO). Backed with money from government contracts, angel investment, and venture capital, private companies have launched hundreds of EO satellites featuring various instruments and sensors. The result of this surge of privately owned satellite constellations is a similar level of satellite data. Beside country-specific data policies, access to this supply of satellite data is governed by competitive pricing. However, the industry is still in the process of effectively marketing the benefits of remote sensing data to commercial clients, finding profitable business models, and recouping financial investment. The book Open Space: The Global Efforts for Open Access to Environmental Satellite Data offers interesting parallels to this situation by looking at the evolution of data policies for environmental satellite data since the 1960s. Mariel Borowitz tackles an important puzzle by explaining why some governments have opted for open access policies, while others chose to limit access to environmental satellite data. More specifically, Borowitz wonders that, given the potential benefits of satellite data for myriad environmental and social problems, why “in many cases the space and meteorological agencies around the world that collect satellite data essential to addressing these issues do not share that data freely[?]” Borowitz identifies a certain pattern in data sharing policies from open access, in the early phases of government remote sensing, to more restrictive regulations, and then back to open data sharing. In this context, the book explains what drove government agencies to change their data sharing policies in this particular sequence. To address these issues, Borowitz develops a theoretical framework and applies it to seven empirical case studies that comprise relevant agencies from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Altogether, the book finds compelling answers for the questions raised, effectively creates a reference guide for data policies of current government Earth observation programs, and provides policy recommendations to increase sharing of global satellite data. This review first presents the central arguments of the book, followed by a summary of pertinent points in the individual chapters. After that, it discusses the book’s strengths and weaknesses in context of the current state of commercial remote sensing.","PeriodicalId":35153,"journal":{"name":"Astropolitics","volume":"84 1","pages":"230 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open space: The global effort for open access to environmental satellite data\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Olbrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14777622.2018.1534470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Changes in the satellite-based remote sensing industry are evident in recent years. Formerly a domain reserved for the military and intelligence agencies of governments, there now exists a so-called geospatial revolution due to the ongoing commercialization of Earth observation (EO). Backed with money from government contracts, angel investment, and venture capital, private companies have launched hundreds of EO satellites featuring various instruments and sensors. The result of this surge of privately owned satellite constellations is a similar level of satellite data. Beside country-specific data policies, access to this supply of satellite data is governed by competitive pricing. However, the industry is still in the process of effectively marketing the benefits of remote sensing data to commercial clients, finding profitable business models, and recouping financial investment. The book Open Space: The Global Efforts for Open Access to Environmental Satellite Data offers interesting parallels to this situation by looking at the evolution of data policies for environmental satellite data since the 1960s. Mariel Borowitz tackles an important puzzle by explaining why some governments have opted for open access policies, while others chose to limit access to environmental satellite data. More specifically, Borowitz wonders that, given the potential benefits of satellite data for myriad environmental and social problems, why “in many cases the space and meteorological agencies around the world that collect satellite data essential to addressing these issues do not share that data freely[?]” Borowitz identifies a certain pattern in data sharing policies from open access, in the early phases of government remote sensing, to more restrictive regulations, and then back to open data sharing. In this context, the book explains what drove government agencies to change their data sharing policies in this particular sequence. To address these issues, Borowitz develops a theoretical framework and applies it to seven empirical case studies that comprise relevant agencies from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Altogether, the book finds compelling answers for the questions raised, effectively creates a reference guide for data policies of current government Earth observation programs, and provides policy recommendations to increase sharing of global satellite data. This review first presents the central arguments of the book, followed by a summary of pertinent points in the individual chapters. After that, it discusses the book’s strengths and weaknesses in context of the current state of commercial remote sensing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astropolitics\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"230 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astropolitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2018.1534470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astropolitics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2018.1534470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

近年来,基于卫星的遥感产业发生了明显的变化。以前是军事和政府情报机构的专属领域,现在由于地球观测(EO)的持续商业化,出现了一场所谓的地理空间革命。在政府合同、天使投资和风险资本的支持下,私营公司发射了数百颗EO卫星,配备了各种仪器和传感器。私人拥有的卫星群激增的结果是类似水平的卫星数据。除了具体国家的数据政策外,这种卫星数据供应的获取还受竞争性定价的制约。然而,该行业仍在有效地向商业客户推销遥感数据的好处,寻找有利可图的商业模式,并收回金融投资。《开放空间:开放获取环境卫星数据的全球努力》一书通过观察自20世纪60年代以来环境卫星数据数据政策的演变,提供了与这种情况有趣的相似之处。Mariel Borowitz通过解释为什么一些政府选择开放获取政策,而另一些政府选择限制获取环境卫星数据,解决了一个重要的难题。更具体地说,Borowitz想知道,鉴于卫星数据对无数环境和社会问题的潜在好处,为什么“在许多情况下,世界各地收集卫星数据对解决这些问题至关重要的空间和气象机构不自由分享这些数据?”“博罗维茨在数据共享政策中发现了一种特定的模式,从开放获取,到政府遥感的早期阶段,到更严格的规定,然后再回到开放数据共享。在这种背景下,这本书解释了是什么驱使政府机构按照这种特定的顺序改变他们的数据共享政策。为了解决这些问题,Borowitz开发了一个理论框架,并将其应用于七个由美国、欧洲和日本相关机构组成的实证案例研究。总之,这本书为提出的问题找到了令人信服的答案,有效地为当前政府地球观测项目的数据政策创建了参考指南,并提供了政策建议,以增加全球卫星数据的共享。这篇评论首先提出了本书的中心论点,然后是对各个章节的相关观点的总结。然后,在当前商业遥感的背景下讨论了本书的优点和缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open space: The global effort for open access to environmental satellite data
Changes in the satellite-based remote sensing industry are evident in recent years. Formerly a domain reserved for the military and intelligence agencies of governments, there now exists a so-called geospatial revolution due to the ongoing commercialization of Earth observation (EO). Backed with money from government contracts, angel investment, and venture capital, private companies have launched hundreds of EO satellites featuring various instruments and sensors. The result of this surge of privately owned satellite constellations is a similar level of satellite data. Beside country-specific data policies, access to this supply of satellite data is governed by competitive pricing. However, the industry is still in the process of effectively marketing the benefits of remote sensing data to commercial clients, finding profitable business models, and recouping financial investment. The book Open Space: The Global Efforts for Open Access to Environmental Satellite Data offers interesting parallels to this situation by looking at the evolution of data policies for environmental satellite data since the 1960s. Mariel Borowitz tackles an important puzzle by explaining why some governments have opted for open access policies, while others chose to limit access to environmental satellite data. More specifically, Borowitz wonders that, given the potential benefits of satellite data for myriad environmental and social problems, why “in many cases the space and meteorological agencies around the world that collect satellite data essential to addressing these issues do not share that data freely[?]” Borowitz identifies a certain pattern in data sharing policies from open access, in the early phases of government remote sensing, to more restrictive regulations, and then back to open data sharing. In this context, the book explains what drove government agencies to change their data sharing policies in this particular sequence. To address these issues, Borowitz develops a theoretical framework and applies it to seven empirical case studies that comprise relevant agencies from the United States, Europe, and Japan. Altogether, the book finds compelling answers for the questions raised, effectively creates a reference guide for data policies of current government Earth observation programs, and provides policy recommendations to increase sharing of global satellite data. This review first presents the central arguments of the book, followed by a summary of pertinent points in the individual chapters. After that, it discusses the book’s strengths and weaknesses in context of the current state of commercial remote sensing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astropolitics
Astropolitics Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: Astropolitics: The International Journal of Space Politics and Policy is a peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal is dedicated to policy relevant and interdisciplinary analysis of civil, commercial, military, and intelligence space activities. Committed to the highest editorial standards, Astropolitics is the international journal of choice for the academic, policy-maker and professional in the space community.
期刊最新文献
Space Policy Imperative: The Urgency for a New International Space Governance System Electric Propulsion in Space: Technology and Geopolitics The Dragon’s Reach: China’s Quest for Space Dominance Watch the Skies: How Science Fiction Viewing, Documentary Viewing, and News Use Predict Attitudes on US Space Initiatives Engaging North Korea in the Space Domain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1