分析提交日志中的开发人员情绪

Vinayak Sinha, A. Lazar, Bonita Sharif
{"title":"分析提交日志中的开发人员情绪","authors":"Vinayak Sinha, A. Lazar, Bonita Sharif","doi":"10.1145/2901739.2903501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an analysis of developer commit logs for GitHub projects. In particular, developer sentiment in commits is analyzed across 28,466 projects within a seven year time frame. We use the Boa infrastructure’s online query system to generate commit logs as well as files that were changed during the commit. We analyze the commits in three categories: large, medium, and small based on the number of commits using a sentiment analysis tool. In addition, we also group the data based on the day of week the commit was made and map the sentiment to the file change history to determine if there was any correlation. Although a majority of the sentiment was neutral, the negative sentiment was about 10% more than the positive sentiment overall. Tuesdays seem to have the most negative sentiment overall. In addition, we do find a strong correlation between the number of files changed and the sentiment expressed by the commits the files were part of. Future work and implications of these results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":6621,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","volume":"23 1","pages":"520-523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing Developer Sentiment in Commit Logs\",\"authors\":\"Vinayak Sinha, A. Lazar, Bonita Sharif\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2901739.2903501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents an analysis of developer commit logs for GitHub projects. In particular, developer sentiment in commits is analyzed across 28,466 projects within a seven year time frame. We use the Boa infrastructure’s online query system to generate commit logs as well as files that were changed during the commit. We analyze the commits in three categories: large, medium, and small based on the number of commits using a sentiment analysis tool. In addition, we also group the data based on the day of week the commit was made and map the sentiment to the file change history to determine if there was any correlation. Although a majority of the sentiment was neutral, the negative sentiment was about 10% more than the positive sentiment overall. Tuesdays seem to have the most negative sentiment overall. In addition, we do find a strong correlation between the number of files changed and the sentiment expressed by the commits the files were part of. Future work and implications of these results are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"520-523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"90\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2903501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE/ACM 13th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2901739.2903501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

摘要

本文对GitHub项目的开发人员提交日志进行了分析。特别是,在七年的时间框架内分析了28,466个项目中提交的开发人员情绪。我们使用Boa基础设施的在线查询系统来生成提交日志以及在提交期间更改的文件。我们使用情感分析工具根据提交的数量将提交分为三类:大、中、小。此外,我们还根据提交的星期对数据进行分组,并将情绪映射到文件更改历史,以确定是否存在任何相关性。虽然大多数人的情绪是中性的,但总的来说,负面情绪比正面情绪多出10%左右。总体而言,周二的负面情绪似乎最为强烈。此外,我们确实发现在被更改的文件数量和文件所属的提交所表达的情绪之间存在很强的相关性。讨论了未来的工作和这些结果的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing Developer Sentiment in Commit Logs
The paper presents an analysis of developer commit logs for GitHub projects. In particular, developer sentiment in commits is analyzed across 28,466 projects within a seven year time frame. We use the Boa infrastructure’s online query system to generate commit logs as well as files that were changed during the commit. We analyze the commits in three categories: large, medium, and small based on the number of commits using a sentiment analysis tool. In addition, we also group the data based on the day of week the commit was made and map the sentiment to the file change history to determine if there was any correlation. Although a majority of the sentiment was neutral, the negative sentiment was about 10% more than the positive sentiment overall. Tuesdays seem to have the most negative sentiment overall. In addition, we do find a strong correlation between the number of files changed and the sentiment expressed by the commits the files were part of. Future work and implications of these results are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MSR '20: 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 29-30 June, 2020 Who you gonna call?: analyzing web requests in Android applications Cena słońca w projektowaniu architektonicznym Multi-extract and Multi-level Dataset of Mozilla Issue Tracking History Interactive Exploration of Developer Interaction Traces using a Hidden Markov Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1