信息提取中不一致的声明性清除

IF 2.2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS ACM Transactions on Database Systems Pub Date : 2016-04-07 DOI:10.1145/2877202
Ronald Fagin, B. Kimelfeld, Frederick Reiss, Stijn Vansummeren
{"title":"信息提取中不一致的声明性清除","authors":"Ronald Fagin, B. Kimelfeld, Frederick Reiss, Stijn Vansummeren","doi":"10.1145/2877202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The population of a predefined relational schema from textual content, commonly known as Information Extraction (IE), is a pervasive task in contemporary computational challenges associated with Big Data. Since the textual content varies widely in nature and structure (from machine logs to informal natural language), it is notoriously difficult to write IE programs that unambiguously extract the sought information. For example, during extraction, an IE program could annotate a substring as both an address and a person name. When this happens, the extracted information is said to be inconsistent, and some way of removing inconsistencies is crucial to compute the final output. Industrial-strength IE systems like GATE and IBM SystemT therefore provide a built-in collection of cleaning operations to remove inconsistencies from extracted relations. These operations, however, are collected in an ad hoc fashion through use cases. Ideally, we would like to allow IE developers to declare their own policies. But existing cleaning operations are defined in an algorithmic way, and hence it is not clear how to extend the built-in operations without requiring low-level coding of internal or external functions.\n We embark on the establishment of a framework for declarative cleaning of inconsistencies in IE through principles of database theory. Specifically, building upon the formalism of document spanners for IE, we adopt the concept of prioritized repairs, which has been recently proposed as an extension of the traditional database repairs to incorporate priorities among conflicting facts. We show that our framework captures the popular cleaning policies, as well as the POSIX semantics for extraction through regular expressions. We explore the problem of determining whether a cleaning declaration is unambiguous (i.e., always results in a single repair) and whether it increases the expressive power of the extraction language. We give both positive and negative results, some of which are general and some of which apply to policies used in practice.","PeriodicalId":50915,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Declarative Cleaning of Inconsistencies in Information Extraction\",\"authors\":\"Ronald Fagin, B. Kimelfeld, Frederick Reiss, Stijn Vansummeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2877202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The population of a predefined relational schema from textual content, commonly known as Information Extraction (IE), is a pervasive task in contemporary computational challenges associated with Big Data. Since the textual content varies widely in nature and structure (from machine logs to informal natural language), it is notoriously difficult to write IE programs that unambiguously extract the sought information. For example, during extraction, an IE program could annotate a substring as both an address and a person name. When this happens, the extracted information is said to be inconsistent, and some way of removing inconsistencies is crucial to compute the final output. Industrial-strength IE systems like GATE and IBM SystemT therefore provide a built-in collection of cleaning operations to remove inconsistencies from extracted relations. These operations, however, are collected in an ad hoc fashion through use cases. Ideally, we would like to allow IE developers to declare their own policies. But existing cleaning operations are defined in an algorithmic way, and hence it is not clear how to extend the built-in operations without requiring low-level coding of internal or external functions.\\n We embark on the establishment of a framework for declarative cleaning of inconsistencies in IE through principles of database theory. Specifically, building upon the formalism of document spanners for IE, we adopt the concept of prioritized repairs, which has been recently proposed as an extension of the traditional database repairs to incorporate priorities among conflicting facts. We show that our framework captures the popular cleaning policies, as well as the POSIX semantics for extraction through regular expressions. We explore the problem of determining whether a cleaning declaration is unambiguous (i.e., always results in a single repair) and whether it increases the expressive power of the extraction language. We give both positive and negative results, some of which are general and some of which apply to policies used in practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Database Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Database Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2877202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Database Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2877202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

从文本内容中填充预定义的关系模式,通常称为信息提取(IE),是与大数据相关的当代计算挑战中普遍存在的任务。由于文本内容在性质和结构上变化很大(从机器日志到非正式的自然语言),因此编写明确地提取所查找信息的IE程序非常困难。例如,在提取过程中,IE程序可以将子字符串注释为地址和人名。当这种情况发生时,提取的信息就被认为是不一致的,而某种消除不一致的方法对于计算最终输出是至关重要的。因此,像GATE和IBM SystemT这样的工业级IE系统提供了一个内置的清理操作集合,以从提取的关系中删除不一致的内容。然而,这些操作是通过用例以特别的方式收集的。理想情况下,我们希望允许IE开发者声明他们自己的策略。但是现有的清理操作是以算法的方式定义的,因此不清楚如何在不需要对内部或外部函数进行底层编码的情况下扩展内置操作。我们着手建立一个框架,通过数据库理论的原则来声明性地清理IE中的不一致性。具体地说,在IE文档生成器的形式主义的基础上,我们采用了优先修复的概念,这是最近提出的传统数据库修复的扩展,将冲突事实中的优先级纳入其中。我们展示了我们的框架捕获了流行的清理策略,以及通过正则表达式进行提取的POSIX语义。我们探讨了确定清理声明是否明确(即,总是导致单个修复)以及它是否增加了提取语言的表达能力的问题。我们给出了积极和消极的结果,有些是一般性的,有些是适用于实际政策的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Declarative Cleaning of Inconsistencies in Information Extraction
The population of a predefined relational schema from textual content, commonly known as Information Extraction (IE), is a pervasive task in contemporary computational challenges associated with Big Data. Since the textual content varies widely in nature and structure (from machine logs to informal natural language), it is notoriously difficult to write IE programs that unambiguously extract the sought information. For example, during extraction, an IE program could annotate a substring as both an address and a person name. When this happens, the extracted information is said to be inconsistent, and some way of removing inconsistencies is crucial to compute the final output. Industrial-strength IE systems like GATE and IBM SystemT therefore provide a built-in collection of cleaning operations to remove inconsistencies from extracted relations. These operations, however, are collected in an ad hoc fashion through use cases. Ideally, we would like to allow IE developers to declare their own policies. But existing cleaning operations are defined in an algorithmic way, and hence it is not clear how to extend the built-in operations without requiring low-level coding of internal or external functions. We embark on the establishment of a framework for declarative cleaning of inconsistencies in IE through principles of database theory. Specifically, building upon the formalism of document spanners for IE, we adopt the concept of prioritized repairs, which has been recently proposed as an extension of the traditional database repairs to incorporate priorities among conflicting facts. We show that our framework captures the popular cleaning policies, as well as the POSIX semantics for extraction through regular expressions. We explore the problem of determining whether a cleaning declaration is unambiguous (i.e., always results in a single repair) and whether it increases the expressive power of the extraction language. We give both positive and negative results, some of which are general and some of which apply to policies used in practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Database Systems
ACM Transactions on Database Systems 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Heavily used in both academic and corporate R&D settings, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) is a key publication for computer scientists working in data abstraction, data modeling, and designing data management systems. Topics include storage and retrieval, transaction management, distributed and federated databases, semantics of data, intelligent databases, and operations and algorithms relating to these areas. In this rapidly changing field, TODS provides insights into the thoughts of the best minds in database R&D.
期刊最新文献
Automated Category Tree Construction: Hardness Bounds and Algorithms Database Repairing with Soft Functional Dependencies Sharing Queries with Nonequivalent User-Defined Aggregate Functions A family of centrality measures for graph data based on subgraphs GraphZeppelin: How to Find Connected Components (Even When Graphs Are Dense, Dynamic, and Massive)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1