“什么样的死?”关于斐多篇的双重主题

Panagiotis Thanassas
{"title":"“什么样的死?”关于斐多篇的双重主题","authors":"Panagiotis Thanassas","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The Socratic instruction (64b) to clarify “what kind of death” a philosopher would deserve suggests two different notions of “death” in the Phaedo: physical demise and philosophy. This double meaning makes it possible for the Platonic Socrates to address a dual audience with a dual purpose: His interlocutors will receive consolation, while the perceptive reader will focus on practicing philosophy on the basis of the hypothesis of Forms. Socrates’ final words can also be illuminated as a vindication of his adherence to logos: the cock to Asclepius has to be offered as a sign of gratitude for healing misology.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"113 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What Kind of Death?”: On the Phaedo’s double topic\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis Thanassas\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rhiz-2017-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: The Socratic instruction (64b) to clarify “what kind of death” a philosopher would deserve suggests two different notions of “death” in the Phaedo: physical demise and philosophy. This double meaning makes it possible for the Platonic Socrates to address a dual audience with a dual purpose: His interlocutors will receive consolation, while the perceptive reader will focus on practicing philosophy on the basis of the hypothesis of Forms. Socrates’ final words can also be illuminated as a vindication of his adherence to logos: the cock to Asclepius has to be offered as a sign of gratitude for healing misology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"113 - 147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:苏格拉底在《斐多篇》中阐明哲学家应该“怎样的死亡”的指示(64b)暗示了两种不同的“死亡”概念:肉体的死亡和哲学的死亡。这种双重意义使得柏拉图式的苏格拉底有可能以双重目的向双重听众讲话:他的对话者将得到安慰,而敏锐的读者将专注于在形式假设的基础上实践哲学。苏格拉底的最后一句话也可以被解释为他坚持逻各斯的辩护:阿斯克勒庇俄斯的公鸡必须作为对治愈misology的感激的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“What Kind of Death?”: On the Phaedo’s double topic
Abstract: The Socratic instruction (64b) to clarify “what kind of death” a philosopher would deserve suggests two different notions of “death” in the Phaedo: physical demise and philosophy. This double meaning makes it possible for the Platonic Socrates to address a dual audience with a dual purpose: His interlocutors will receive consolation, while the perceptive reader will focus on practicing philosophy on the basis of the hypothesis of Forms. Socrates’ final words can also be illuminated as a vindication of his adherence to logos: the cock to Asclepius has to be offered as a sign of gratitude for healing misology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
Between Poetry, Philosophy and Medicine: Body, Soul and Dreams in Pindar, Heraclitus and the Hippocratic On Regimen. Heraclitus on the Question of a Common Measure From Zeno ad infinitum: Iterative Reasonings in Early Greek Philosophy Reconsidering the Essential Nature and Indestructibility of the Soul in the Affinity Argument of the Phaedo Aristotle as an Astronomer? Sosigenes’ Account of Metaphysics Λ.8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1