单层牙科复合材料与双层牙科复合材料的比色比较

Young-Sang Song, Ja-Hyun Kim, Bin-Na Lee, Ji-Hyun Jang, Hoon-Sang Chang, Y. Hwang, W. Oh, In-Nam Hwang
{"title":"单层牙科复合材料与双层牙科复合材料的比色比较","authors":"Young-Sang Song, Ja-Hyun Kim, Bin-Na Lee, Ji-Hyun Jang, Hoon-Sang Chang, Y. Hwang, W. Oh, In-Nam Hwang","doi":"10.5395/RDE.2012.37.2.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study analyzed the difference in color caused by different thickness in enamel layer of composite resins when applied with single and layering placement technique, and evaluated if the results agreed with the shade guide from the manufacturers to verify reliability of the color matching process of the manufacturers. Materials and Methods: For single composite resin samples, 6 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness cylindrical samples were fabricated using Ceram-X mono (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and CIE values were measured with spectrophotometer. Same process was done for layering composite resin samples, making 3 dentinal shade samples, 4 mm thickness, for each shade using Ceram-X duo (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and enamel shade resins were layered in 2 mm thickness and CIE values were measured. These samples were ground to 0.2 mm thickness each time, and CIE values were measured to 1 mm thickness of enamel shade resin. Results: Color difference () between single and layering composite resin was 1.37 minimum and 10.53 maximum when layering thicknesses were between 1 mm and 2 mm and 6 out of 10 same shade groups suggested by manufacturer showed remarkable color difference at any thickness ( > 3.3). Conclusion: When using Ceram-X mono and duo for composite resin restoration, following the manufacturer's instructions for choosing the shade is not appropriate, and more accurate information for Ceram-X duo is needed on the variation and expression of the shades depending on the thickness of the enamel.","PeriodicalId":21126,"journal":{"name":"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorimetric comparison of single layered dental composite with double layered dental composite\",\"authors\":\"Young-Sang Song, Ja-Hyun Kim, Bin-Na Lee, Ji-Hyun Jang, Hoon-Sang Chang, Y. Hwang, W. Oh, In-Nam Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.5395/RDE.2012.37.2.84\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: This study analyzed the difference in color caused by different thickness in enamel layer of composite resins when applied with single and layering placement technique, and evaluated if the results agreed with the shade guide from the manufacturers to verify reliability of the color matching process of the manufacturers. Materials and Methods: For single composite resin samples, 6 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness cylindrical samples were fabricated using Ceram-X mono (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and CIE values were measured with spectrophotometer. Same process was done for layering composite resin samples, making 3 dentinal shade samples, 4 mm thickness, for each shade using Ceram-X duo (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and enamel shade resins were layered in 2 mm thickness and CIE values were measured. These samples were ground to 0.2 mm thickness each time, and CIE values were measured to 1 mm thickness of enamel shade resin. Results: Color difference () between single and layering composite resin was 1.37 minimum and 10.53 maximum when layering thicknesses were between 1 mm and 2 mm and 6 out of 10 same shade groups suggested by manufacturer showed remarkable color difference at any thickness ( > 3.3). Conclusion: When using Ceram-X mono and duo for composite resin restoration, following the manufacturer's instructions for choosing the shade is not appropriate, and more accurate information for Ceram-X duo is needed on the variation and expression of the shades depending on the thickness of the enamel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5395/RDE.2012.37.2.84\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5395/RDE.2012.37.2.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究分析复合树脂在单层和分层贴片工艺下,由于釉质层厚度不同而产生的颜色差异,并评估结果是否与厂家的色度指南一致,验证厂家配色工艺的可靠性。材料与方法:对单一复合树脂样品,采用cerami - x mono (DENTSPLY DeTrey)制备直径为6 mm、厚度为4 mm的圆柱形样品,用分光光度计测定CIE值。对复合树脂样品进行相同的分层处理,制作3个牙本质遮光样品,每个遮光样品使用陶粒- x duo (DENTSPLY DeTrey),每个遮光样品使用2毫米厚度的牙釉质遮光树脂分层,并测量CIE值。这些样品每次研磨至0.2 mm厚度,CIE值测量至1 mm厚度的搪瓷遮光树脂。结果:单层复合树脂与分层复合树脂的色差()在分层厚度为1 ~ 2 mm时最小为1.37,最大为10.53,生产厂家建议的10个相同色差组中有6个在任何厚度下色差均显著(> 3.3)。结论:在使用陶粒- x单面和双面进行复合树脂修复时,不应按照生产厂家的说明来选择色度,陶粒- x双面需要更准确地了解色度随牙釉质厚度的变化和表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Colorimetric comparison of single layered dental composite with double layered dental composite
Objectives: This study analyzed the difference in color caused by different thickness in enamel layer of composite resins when applied with single and layering placement technique, and evaluated if the results agreed with the shade guide from the manufacturers to verify reliability of the color matching process of the manufacturers. Materials and Methods: For single composite resin samples, 6 mm diameter and 4 mm thickness cylindrical samples were fabricated using Ceram-X mono (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and CIE values were measured with spectrophotometer. Same process was done for layering composite resin samples, making 3 dentinal shade samples, 4 mm thickness, for each shade using Ceram-X duo (DENTSPLY DeTrey) and enamel shade resins were layered in 2 mm thickness and CIE values were measured. These samples were ground to 0.2 mm thickness each time, and CIE values were measured to 1 mm thickness of enamel shade resin. Results: Color difference () between single and layering composite resin was 1.37 minimum and 10.53 maximum when layering thicknesses were between 1 mm and 2 mm and 6 out of 10 same shade groups suggested by manufacturer showed remarkable color difference at any thickness ( > 3.3). Conclusion: When using Ceram-X mono and duo for composite resin restoration, following the manufacturer's instructions for choosing the shade is not appropriate, and more accurate information for Ceram-X duo is needed on the variation and expression of the shades depending on the thickness of the enamel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of at-home bleaching protocol with application on different surfaces: bleaching efficacy and hydrogen peroxide permeability Ingestion and surgical retrieval of an endodontic file: a case report Does minimally invasive canal preparation provide higher fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth? A systematic review of in vitro studies Effect of dentin roughening and type of composite material on the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: an in vivo study with 18 months of follow-up Micro-CT evaluation of the removal of root fillings using rotary and reciprocating systems supplemented by XP-Endo Finisher, the Self-Adjusting File, or Er,Cr:YSGG laser
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1