基于空间分析测量的摄影测量在正畸诊断中的应用

Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mihajlo Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, Adriana Arbutina, N. Nedeljkovic, B. Glišić
{"title":"基于空间分析测量的摄影测量在正畸诊断中的应用","authors":"Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mihajlo Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, Adriana Arbutina, N. Nedeljkovic, B. Glišić","doi":"10.2478/sdj-2018-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Introduction Lundstrom segmental analysis is often used analysis in orthodontic diagnosis. It includes measurements of available and needed space in the arch in order to determine whether there is a lack or excess of space for proper teeth alignment. Measurements are traditionally performed on plaster study models, but with recent developments of computer-based systems, there is an increase in use of digital models in measuring process. The aim of this study was to present a photogrammetry based measurement approach that requires no specialized and expensive hardware and compare results with ones obtained on 3D scanned models. Material and method On 50 plaster study models measurements of 24 teeth, widths of 12 segments and Lundstrom segmental analysis were performed. 3D scanned study models were analyzed in the photogrammetry software Ortho-Photo4D on the set of four photographs of the study model in custom made measurement apparatus. The software corrects for finite distance of the camera and corrects errors due to perspective distortion. Results Statistical analysis performed on obtained measurements provided Bland-Altman plots that strongly suggested high degree of correspondence between the two measurements methods. Discrepancies for maxilla for individual segments were under 0.25 mm with standard deviation of up to 0.16 mm, and less than 1 mm and deviation of up to 0.4 mm for complete arch. For mandible the differences were up to 0.27 mm for segments with 0.15 mm deviation and 0.6 mm for complete arch with up to 0.24 mm deviation. Correlation coefficient was over 0.985 in all cases. Conclusions Both analyzed methods can be equally used in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":52984,"journal":{"name":"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije","volume":"113 1","pages":"78 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photogrammetry based space analysis measurements in orthodontic diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"Marijana Arapović-Savić, Mihajlo Savić, Mirjana Umićević-Davidović, Adriana Arbutina, N. Nedeljkovic, B. Glišić\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/sdj-2018-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary Introduction Lundstrom segmental analysis is often used analysis in orthodontic diagnosis. It includes measurements of available and needed space in the arch in order to determine whether there is a lack or excess of space for proper teeth alignment. Measurements are traditionally performed on plaster study models, but with recent developments of computer-based systems, there is an increase in use of digital models in measuring process. The aim of this study was to present a photogrammetry based measurement approach that requires no specialized and expensive hardware and compare results with ones obtained on 3D scanned models. Material and method On 50 plaster study models measurements of 24 teeth, widths of 12 segments and Lundstrom segmental analysis were performed. 3D scanned study models were analyzed in the photogrammetry software Ortho-Photo4D on the set of four photographs of the study model in custom made measurement apparatus. The software corrects for finite distance of the camera and corrects errors due to perspective distortion. Results Statistical analysis performed on obtained measurements provided Bland-Altman plots that strongly suggested high degree of correspondence between the two measurements methods. Discrepancies for maxilla for individual segments were under 0.25 mm with standard deviation of up to 0.16 mm, and less than 1 mm and deviation of up to 0.4 mm for complete arch. For mandible the differences were up to 0.27 mm for segments with 0.15 mm deviation and 0.6 mm for complete arch with up to 0.24 mm deviation. Correlation coefficient was over 0.985 in all cases. Conclusions Both analyzed methods can be equally used in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"78 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatoloski glasnik Srbije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Lundstrom节段分析是正畸诊断中常用的分析方法。它包括测量牙弓中可用和需要的空间,以确定是否有足够的空间来正确排列牙齿。测量传统上是在石膏研究模型上进行的,但随着最近基于计算机系统的发展,在测量过程中使用数字模型的情况有所增加。本研究的目的是提出一种基于摄影测量的测量方法,该方法不需要专门和昂贵的硬件,并将结果与3D扫描模型的结果进行比较。材料与方法对50个石膏模型进行了24颗牙的测量、12个节段的宽度和Lundstrom节段分析。三维扫描研究模型在摄影测量软件Ortho-Photo4D中对定制测量仪中研究模型的四张照片进行分析。该软件对相机的有限距离进行了校正,并校正了由于透视畸变引起的误差。结果对获得的测量结果进行统计分析,提供Bland-Altman图,强烈表明两种测量方法之间高度对应。上颌骨单节段误差小于0.25 mm,标准差达0.16 mm;全弓误差小于1 mm,偏差达0.4 mm。对于下颌骨,偏差为0.15 mm的节段差异达0.27 mm,偏差为0.24 mm的全弓差异达0.6 mm。相关系数均大于0.985。结论两种分析方法均可在临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Photogrammetry based space analysis measurements in orthodontic diagnosis
Summary Introduction Lundstrom segmental analysis is often used analysis in orthodontic diagnosis. It includes measurements of available and needed space in the arch in order to determine whether there is a lack or excess of space for proper teeth alignment. Measurements are traditionally performed on plaster study models, but with recent developments of computer-based systems, there is an increase in use of digital models in measuring process. The aim of this study was to present a photogrammetry based measurement approach that requires no specialized and expensive hardware and compare results with ones obtained on 3D scanned models. Material and method On 50 plaster study models measurements of 24 teeth, widths of 12 segments and Lundstrom segmental analysis were performed. 3D scanned study models were analyzed in the photogrammetry software Ortho-Photo4D on the set of four photographs of the study model in custom made measurement apparatus. The software corrects for finite distance of the camera and corrects errors due to perspective distortion. Results Statistical analysis performed on obtained measurements provided Bland-Altman plots that strongly suggested high degree of correspondence between the two measurements methods. Discrepancies for maxilla for individual segments were under 0.25 mm with standard deviation of up to 0.16 mm, and less than 1 mm and deviation of up to 0.4 mm for complete arch. For mandible the differences were up to 0.27 mm for segments with 0.15 mm deviation and 0.6 mm for complete arch with up to 0.24 mm deviation. Correlation coefficient was over 0.985 in all cases. Conclusions Both analyzed methods can be equally used in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
An influence of finishing procedures and protective coating on the ultrastructure of conventional and hybrid glass ionomer cement restorations Examination of the presence of periodontitis and gingivitis in rats with induced diabetes mellitus Condylographic evaluation of propulsive and Bennett angles in patients with temporomandibular disorders Cyclic fatigue testing of ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary instruments of different diameters Oral health behavior and oral hygiene habits of elderly population in Podgorica, Montenegro
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1