中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在缺血性卒中亚型和卒中严重程度中的评价

Dhrumil Shah, Rajeswari Rajan, A. Batra, I. Anand, A. Saraf, P. Sethi
{"title":"中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值在缺血性卒中亚型和卒中严重程度中的评价","authors":"Dhrumil Shah, Rajeswari Rajan, A. Batra, I. Anand, A. Saraf, P. Sethi","doi":"10.1177/25166085221095183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Recently, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proven to be useful in predicting severity, mortality, and morbidity of stroke. NLR is low cost and yet not used widely as a biomarker to predict prognosis. Aims: We evaluated the association of NLR in severity of stroke and ischemic stroke subtypes. Methodology: A total of 69 subjects with ischemic stroke onset within 24 h were included in the study and categorized according to TOAST classification. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to determine stroke severity at admission. Samples were obtained within 24 h of stroke onset and NLR measured which was later correlated with severity and subtypes of stroke. Results: NLR and severity of stroke showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) of NLR was significantly high in severe cases (7.1 [4.03-7.698]), as compared to others. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NLR to predict the stroke severity was 6.07 [area under the curve 0.764; 95% confidence interval: 0.647 to 0.858). When NLR was more than 6.07, there was 90.90% chances of moderate-to-severe stroke and with milder stroke, 93.10% had NLR of less than equal to 6.07. NLR and stroke subtypes also showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (IQR) of NLR in embolic stroke was significantly high (4.75 [2.95-8.2]), as compared to other stroke subtypes. Conclusion: NLR, at a cut-off 6, has moderate sensitivity and higher specificity in predicting stroke severity and NLR was high in embolic stroke among other stroke subtypes.","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":"3 1","pages":"40 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Among Ischemic Stroke Subtypes and Stroke Severity\",\"authors\":\"Dhrumil Shah, Rajeswari Rajan, A. Batra, I. Anand, A. Saraf, P. Sethi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25166085221095183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Recently, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proven to be useful in predicting severity, mortality, and morbidity of stroke. NLR is low cost and yet not used widely as a biomarker to predict prognosis. Aims: We evaluated the association of NLR in severity of stroke and ischemic stroke subtypes. Methodology: A total of 69 subjects with ischemic stroke onset within 24 h were included in the study and categorized according to TOAST classification. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to determine stroke severity at admission. Samples were obtained within 24 h of stroke onset and NLR measured which was later correlated with severity and subtypes of stroke. Results: NLR and severity of stroke showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) of NLR was significantly high in severe cases (7.1 [4.03-7.698]), as compared to others. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NLR to predict the stroke severity was 6.07 [area under the curve 0.764; 95% confidence interval: 0.647 to 0.858). When NLR was more than 6.07, there was 90.90% chances of moderate-to-severe stroke and with milder stroke, 93.10% had NLR of less than equal to 6.07. NLR and stroke subtypes also showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (IQR) of NLR in embolic stroke was significantly high (4.75 [2.95-8.2]), as compared to other stroke subtypes. Conclusion: NLR, at a cut-off 6, has moderate sensitivity and higher specificity in predicting stroke severity and NLR was high in embolic stroke among other stroke subtypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of stroke medicine\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"40 - 47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of stroke medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085221095183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085221095183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

近年来,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)已被证明可用于预测中风的严重程度、死亡率和发病率。NLR成本低,但尚未广泛用作预测预后的生物标志物。目的:我们评估NLR与脑卒中严重程度和缺血性脑卒中亚型的关系。方法:将69例24 h内发病的缺血性卒中患者纳入研究,按TOAST分类。入院时采用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表确定卒中严重程度。在脑卒中发生24小时内采集样本,并测量NLR, NLR随后与脑卒中的严重程度和亚型相关。结果:NLR与脑卒中严重程度有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。重症NLR的中位数(四分位数间距[IQR])明显高于其他病例(7.1[4.03-7.698])。NLR预测脑卒中严重程度的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为6.07,曲线下面积为0.764;95%置信区间:0.647 ~ 0.858)。当NLR大于6.07时,发生中重度卒中的几率为90.90%;当NLR小于6.07时,发生轻度卒中的几率为93.10%。NLR与脑卒中亚型也有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。栓塞性卒中NLR的中位数(IQR)明显高于其他卒中亚型(4.75[2.95-8.2])。结论:NLR在预测脑卒中严重程度方面具有中等敏感性和较高特异性,在其他脑卒中亚型中,NLR在栓塞性脑卒中中较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Among Ischemic Stroke Subtypes and Stroke Severity
Introduction: Recently, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proven to be useful in predicting severity, mortality, and morbidity of stroke. NLR is low cost and yet not used widely as a biomarker to predict prognosis. Aims: We evaluated the association of NLR in severity of stroke and ischemic stroke subtypes. Methodology: A total of 69 subjects with ischemic stroke onset within 24 h were included in the study and categorized according to TOAST classification. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was used to determine stroke severity at admission. Samples were obtained within 24 h of stroke onset and NLR measured which was later correlated with severity and subtypes of stroke. Results: NLR and severity of stroke showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (interquartile range [IQR]) of NLR was significantly high in severe cases (7.1 [4.03-7.698]), as compared to others. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for NLR to predict the stroke severity was 6.07 [area under the curve 0.764; 95% confidence interval: 0.647 to 0.858). When NLR was more than 6.07, there was 90.90% chances of moderate-to-severe stroke and with milder stroke, 93.10% had NLR of less than equal to 6.07. NLR and stroke subtypes also showed statistically significant association (P < .05). Median (IQR) of NLR in embolic stroke was significantly high (4.75 [2.95-8.2]), as compared to other stroke subtypes. Conclusion: NLR, at a cut-off 6, has moderate sensitivity and higher specificity in predicting stroke severity and NLR was high in embolic stroke among other stroke subtypes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1