危机后的日本核政策:从自上而下的指令到自下而上的行动主义

Q4 Social Sciences Asia Pacific Issues Pub Date : 2012-01-10 DOI:10.1515/9780824838775-017
Daniel P. Aldrich
{"title":"危机后的日本核政策:从自上而下的指令到自下而上的行动主义","authors":"Daniel P. Aldrich","doi":"10.1515/9780824838775-017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past fifty years, Japan has developed one of the most advanced commercial nuclear power programs in the world. This is largely due to the government’s broad repertoire of policy instruments that have helped further its nuclear power goals. These top-down directives have resulted in the construction of 54 plants and at least the appearance of widespread support for nuclear power. By the 1990s, however, this carefully cultivated public support was beginning to break apart. And following the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011 and resulting nuclear crisis in the Fukushima nuclear complex, the political and social landscape for energy in Japan has been dramatically altered. The crisis has raised and reinforced environmental concerns and health fears, as well as skepticism about information from government and corporate sources. A civil society that for decades has appeared weak and nonpartcipatory has awakened and citizens are carrying out bottom-up responses to the accident, effecting change with grassroots science and activism.","PeriodicalId":35844,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Crisis Japanese Nuclear Policy: From Top-down Directives to Bottom-up Activism\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P. Aldrich\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780824838775-017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past fifty years, Japan has developed one of the most advanced commercial nuclear power programs in the world. This is largely due to the government’s broad repertoire of policy instruments that have helped further its nuclear power goals. These top-down directives have resulted in the construction of 54 plants and at least the appearance of widespread support for nuclear power. By the 1990s, however, this carefully cultivated public support was beginning to break apart. And following the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011 and resulting nuclear crisis in the Fukushima nuclear complex, the political and social landscape for energy in Japan has been dramatically altered. The crisis has raised and reinforced environmental concerns and health fears, as well as skepticism about information from government and corporate sources. A civil society that for decades has appeared weak and nonpartcipatory has awakened and citizens are carrying out bottom-up responses to the accident, effecting change with grassroots science and activism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824838775-017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824838775-017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

在过去的50年里,日本开发了世界上最先进的商业核电项目之一。这在很大程度上要归功于政府广泛的政策工具,这些工具有助于推进其核电目标。这些自上而下的指令导致了54座核电站的建设,至少在表面上显示出对核能的广泛支持。然而,到了20世纪90年代,这种精心培育的公众支持开始瓦解。2011年3月的地震和海啸以及由此引发的福岛核电站核危机之后,日本能源领域的政治和社会格局发生了巨大变化。这场危机引发并加剧了人们对环境和健康的担忧,以及对政府和企业信息来源的怀疑。几十年来一直表现出软弱和不参与的公民社会觉醒了,公民们对事故进行了自下而上的回应,用草根科学和行动主义影响了变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Post-Crisis Japanese Nuclear Policy: From Top-down Directives to Bottom-up Activism
Over the past fifty years, Japan has developed one of the most advanced commercial nuclear power programs in the world. This is largely due to the government’s broad repertoire of policy instruments that have helped further its nuclear power goals. These top-down directives have resulted in the construction of 54 plants and at least the appearance of widespread support for nuclear power. By the 1990s, however, this carefully cultivated public support was beginning to break apart. And following the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011 and resulting nuclear crisis in the Fukushima nuclear complex, the political and social landscape for energy in Japan has been dramatically altered. The crisis has raised and reinforced environmental concerns and health fears, as well as skepticism about information from government and corporate sources. A civil society that for decades has appeared weak and nonpartcipatory has awakened and citizens are carrying out bottom-up responses to the accident, effecting change with grassroots science and activism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Issues
Asia Pacific Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The AsiaPacific Issues are published by the East-West Center. The eight-page papers in the AsiaPacific Issues series illuminate issues of broad interest or significant impact. Written without jargon that would exclude nonspecialists, they report on the environment, international relations, domestic politics, human rights, population and health, economics, trade, and other areas of critical importance.
期刊最新文献
Post-Crisis Japanese Nuclear Policy: From Top-down Directives to Bottom-up Activism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1