标杆管理是优化康复的理想方法

Bernd Fuhrlaender
{"title":"标杆管理是优化康复的理想方法","authors":"Bernd Fuhrlaender","doi":"10.1017/idm.2014.69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To show that benchmarking, through internal and/or external structured comparisons, is the ideal method to conduct more efficient and more effective processes. The presentation illustrates that benchmarking, especially in the rehabilitation of accident victims, is the appropriate method to use to focus on the various interests, backgrounds and individual needs of accident victims during therapy management. The objective of the project, Benchmarking the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Case Management, was to identify usable examples and methods for optimizing therapy management based on structured comparisons. The project, in which fourteen insurance carriers took part, was initiated by the German association of accident insurance carriers, Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DGUV). The Benchmarking focused on how the insurance carriers handled the rehabilitation process, from the time of the accident to the end of the treatment period or the occupational reintegration. The entire rehabilitation process, including the case work as well as the active planning, cooperation and monitoring of the medical, professional and social rehabilitation was divided into several segments. In this way, regardless of differences in the various procedures of the participants, fair and speedy comparisons of the segments could be established. For example: • Analysis of all the processes and structures of therapy management• Parameters for accident severity and frequency• Resources used (overhead, personnel cost, time)• Assessment of existing management tools Results: None of the participating carriers had the “ideal organization” of his therapy management program. Nevertheless, clear “Best Practice” examples were identified within the respective sub processes. From this, several recommendations were made. The presentation points out the most significant ones. Conclusion: The Benchmarking project was successful. The participating carriers followed the recommendations and thereby increased the efficiency and effectiveness of their therapy management program.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking as an ideal method for optimising rehabilitation\",\"authors\":\"Bernd Fuhrlaender\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/idm.2014.69\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To show that benchmarking, through internal and/or external structured comparisons, is the ideal method to conduct more efficient and more effective processes. The presentation illustrates that benchmarking, especially in the rehabilitation of accident victims, is the appropriate method to use to focus on the various interests, backgrounds and individual needs of accident victims during therapy management. The objective of the project, Benchmarking the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Case Management, was to identify usable examples and methods for optimizing therapy management based on structured comparisons. The project, in which fourteen insurance carriers took part, was initiated by the German association of accident insurance carriers, Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DGUV). The Benchmarking focused on how the insurance carriers handled the rehabilitation process, from the time of the accident to the end of the treatment period or the occupational reintegration. The entire rehabilitation process, including the case work as well as the active planning, cooperation and monitoring of the medical, professional and social rehabilitation was divided into several segments. In this way, regardless of differences in the various procedures of the participants, fair and speedy comparisons of the segments could be established. For example: • Analysis of all the processes and structures of therapy management• Parameters for accident severity and frequency• Resources used (overhead, personnel cost, time)• Assessment of existing management tools Results: None of the participating carriers had the “ideal organization” of his therapy management program. Nevertheless, clear “Best Practice” examples were identified within the respective sub processes. From this, several recommendations were made. The presentation points out the most significant ones. Conclusion: The Benchmarking project was successful. The participating carriers followed the recommendations and thereby increased the efficiency and effectiveness of their therapy management program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.69\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过内部和/或外部结构化比较,表明标杆管理是开展更高效、更有效流程的理想方法。讲座说明,在治疗管理过程中,对标是关注事故受害者不同兴趣、背景和个人需要的适当方法,尤其是在事故受害者的康复方面。该项目的目标是对病例管理的有效性和效率进行基准测试,目的是在结构化比较的基础上确定可用的例子和方法来优化治疗管理。该项目有14家保险公司参与,是由德国意外保险公司协会(Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung)发起的。基准测试的重点是保险公司如何处理康复过程,从事故发生时到治疗期结束或重返职业社会。整个康复过程,包括个案工作以及对医疗、专业和社会康复的积极规划、合作和监测,分为几个部分。这样,无论参与者的各种程序如何不同,都可以对各部分进行公平和迅速的比较。例如:•分析治疗管理的所有流程和结构•事故严重程度和频率的参数•使用的资源(开销,人员成本,时间)•现有管理工具的评估结果:参与的运营商都没有其治疗管理计划的“理想组织”。然而,在各自的子过程中确定了清晰的“最佳实践”示例。据此,提出了若干建议。报告指出了其中最重要的几点。结论:对标工程是成功的。参与的携带者遵循这些建议,从而提高了他们的治疗管理计划的效率和效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmarking as an ideal method for optimising rehabilitation
Objective: To show that benchmarking, through internal and/or external structured comparisons, is the ideal method to conduct more efficient and more effective processes. The presentation illustrates that benchmarking, especially in the rehabilitation of accident victims, is the appropriate method to use to focus on the various interests, backgrounds and individual needs of accident victims during therapy management. The objective of the project, Benchmarking the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Case Management, was to identify usable examples and methods for optimizing therapy management based on structured comparisons. The project, in which fourteen insurance carriers took part, was initiated by the German association of accident insurance carriers, Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung (DGUV). The Benchmarking focused on how the insurance carriers handled the rehabilitation process, from the time of the accident to the end of the treatment period or the occupational reintegration. The entire rehabilitation process, including the case work as well as the active planning, cooperation and monitoring of the medical, professional and social rehabilitation was divided into several segments. In this way, regardless of differences in the various procedures of the participants, fair and speedy comparisons of the segments could be established. For example: • Analysis of all the processes and structures of therapy management• Parameters for accident severity and frequency• Resources used (overhead, personnel cost, time)• Assessment of existing management tools Results: None of the participating carriers had the “ideal organization” of his therapy management program. Nevertheless, clear “Best Practice” examples were identified within the respective sub processes. From this, several recommendations were made. The presentation points out the most significant ones. Conclusion: The Benchmarking project was successful. The participating carriers followed the recommendations and thereby increased the efficiency and effectiveness of their therapy management program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Implementierung Vorteile eines gelingenden DisAbility-Managements Interrelated Factors for Return to Work of Sick-Listed Employees in Sweden Disclosing a Diagnosis in the Workplace: Perspective of People With Multiple Sclerosis Mögliche Widerstände
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1