评估老年心血管疾病患者虚弱状态的复合生物标志物

A. Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Noriyuki Suzuki, K. Nomoto, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, Kenji Sato, I. Kondo, T. Murohara, H. Arai
{"title":"评估老年心血管疾病患者虚弱状态的复合生物标志物","authors":"A. Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Noriyuki Suzuki, K. Nomoto, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, Kenji Sato, I. Kondo, T. Murohara, H. Arai","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The relationship between frailty status and laboratory measurements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear. We investigated which laboratory measurements indicated frailty in stable older CVD patients. Methods and Results: One-hundred thirty-eight stable older CVD patients were evaluated by laboratory measurements, with frailty assessed using the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Laboratory measurements were compared between frail and non-frail groups. Across the entire cohort, mean age was 81.7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.8%, and mean plasma B-type natriuretic peptide was 182 pg/mL. KCL scores were used to divide patients into non-frail (n=43; KCL <8) and frail (n=95; KCL ≥8) groups. Serum iron was significantly lower in the frail than non-frail group (mean [±SD] 61.2±30.3 vs. 89.5±26.1 μg/dL, respectively; P<0.001). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN; 27.3±16.5 vs. 19.7±8.2 mg/dL; P=0.013) and C-reactive protein (CRP; 1.05±1.99 vs. 0.15±0.21 mg/dL; P=0.004) were significantly higher in the frail than non-frail group. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum iron, CRP, and BUN were significant independent predictors of frailty (β=−0.069, 0.917, and 0.086, respectively). Conclusions: Frailty status was significantly associated with iron, CRP, and BUN in stable older CVD patients. Composite biomarkers (inflammation, iron deficiency, and renal perfusion) may be useful for assessing frailty in these patients.","PeriodicalId":94305,"journal":{"name":"Circulation reports","volume":"24 1","pages":"123 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Composite Biomarkers for Assessing Frailty Status in Stable Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease\",\"authors\":\"A. Hirashiki, A. Shimizu, Noriyuki Suzuki, K. Nomoto, M. Kokubo, Kakeru Hashimoto, Kenji Sato, I. Kondo, T. Murohara, H. Arai\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The relationship between frailty status and laboratory measurements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear. We investigated which laboratory measurements indicated frailty in stable older CVD patients. Methods and Results: One-hundred thirty-eight stable older CVD patients were evaluated by laboratory measurements, with frailty assessed using the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Laboratory measurements were compared between frail and non-frail groups. Across the entire cohort, mean age was 81.7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.8%, and mean plasma B-type natriuretic peptide was 182 pg/mL. KCL scores were used to divide patients into non-frail (n=43; KCL <8) and frail (n=95; KCL ≥8) groups. Serum iron was significantly lower in the frail than non-frail group (mean [±SD] 61.2±30.3 vs. 89.5±26.1 μg/dL, respectively; P<0.001). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN; 27.3±16.5 vs. 19.7±8.2 mg/dL; P=0.013) and C-reactive protein (CRP; 1.05±1.99 vs. 0.15±0.21 mg/dL; P=0.004) were significantly higher in the frail than non-frail group. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum iron, CRP, and BUN were significant independent predictors of frailty (β=−0.069, 0.917, and 0.086, respectively). Conclusions: Frailty status was significantly associated with iron, CRP, and BUN in stable older CVD patients. Composite biomarkers (inflammation, iron deficiency, and renal perfusion) may be useful for assessing frailty in these patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation reports\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-21-0143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱状态与心血管疾病(CVD)实验室测量之间的关系尚不清楚。我们调查了在稳定的老年CVD患者中,哪些实验室测量表明虚弱。方法和结果:通过实验室测量对138例稳定的老年CVD患者进行评估,并使用Kihon Checklist (KCL)评估虚弱程度。比较虚弱组和非虚弱组的实验室测量结果。在整个队列中,平均年龄为81.7岁,平均左室射血分数为57.8%,平均血浆b型利钠肽为182 pg/mL。KCL评分将患者分为非虚弱组(n=43;KCL <8)和虚弱(n=95;KCL≥8)组。体弱组血清铁明显低于非体弱组(平均[±SD]分别为61.2±30.3∶89.5±26.1 μg/dL;P < 0.001)。血尿素氮(BUN);27.3±16.5 vs. 19.7±8.2 mg/dL;P=0.013)和c反应蛋白(CRP;1.05±1.99 vs 0.15±0.21 mg/dL;P=0.004),体弱组明显高于非体弱组。多因素分析显示,血清铁、CRP和BUN是虚弱的显著独立预测因子(β分别= - 0.069、0.917和0.086)。结论:在稳定的老年CVD患者中,虚弱状态与铁、CRP和BUN显著相关。复合生物标志物(炎症、缺铁和肾灌注)可能有助于评估这些患者的虚弱程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Composite Biomarkers for Assessing Frailty Status in Stable Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease
Background: The relationship between frailty status and laboratory measurements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains unclear. We investigated which laboratory measurements indicated frailty in stable older CVD patients. Methods and Results: One-hundred thirty-eight stable older CVD patients were evaluated by laboratory measurements, with frailty assessed using the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Laboratory measurements were compared between frail and non-frail groups. Across the entire cohort, mean age was 81.7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.8%, and mean plasma B-type natriuretic peptide was 182 pg/mL. KCL scores were used to divide patients into non-frail (n=43; KCL <8) and frail (n=95; KCL ≥8) groups. Serum iron was significantly lower in the frail than non-frail group (mean [±SD] 61.2±30.3 vs. 89.5±26.1 μg/dL, respectively; P<0.001). Blood urea nitrogen (BUN; 27.3±16.5 vs. 19.7±8.2 mg/dL; P=0.013) and C-reactive protein (CRP; 1.05±1.99 vs. 0.15±0.21 mg/dL; P=0.004) were significantly higher in the frail than non-frail group. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum iron, CRP, and BUN were significant independent predictors of frailty (β=−0.069, 0.917, and 0.086, respectively). Conclusions: Frailty status was significantly associated with iron, CRP, and BUN in stable older CVD patients. Composite biomarkers (inflammation, iron deficiency, and renal perfusion) may be useful for assessing frailty in these patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Driven Frailty Prediction Using Electronic Health Records in Hospitalized Patients With Cardiovascular Disease. Outcomes of Older Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using the Impella Device - Insights From the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD). Bioprosthetic Valve Positions in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation - Insights From the BPV-AF Registry. Incidence of Angiographic Deterioration Following Inframalleolar Angioplasty and Its Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Requiring Repeat Intervention. Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation: Ambulatory Heart Groups - A Model From Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1