书评:布拉德利·纳西夫的《东正教的福音派神学》

Calum Samuelson
{"title":"书评:布拉德利·纳西夫的《东正教的福音派神学》","authors":"Calum Samuelson","doi":"10.1177/02653788221144422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this book, Professor Bradley Nassif has provided significant insight that is seldom found anywhere else. Positioned as very few others are, he brings clarity to vital matters within Orthodoxy while using language that is usually associated with other Christian traditions. In doing so, he has crafted a work of tremendous ecumenical importance. Nassif has extensive experience with different branches of Christianity, holding degrees from Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox institutions and having taught in prominent universities from different traditions as well. Perhaps, the best way to describe Nassif’s skill is that he can ‘speak the language’ of each group with fluency. The publication begins with a Foreword from esteemed Professor Andrew Louth, which excellently frames the nature and importance of the work as a whole. Louth helpfully signals the fact that this book is mostly a collection of previously published essays and conference lectures. Nassif’s own introduction (entitled ‘What is the Gospel’) is also useful in setting the tone of the book. The stated goal involves ‘making the gospel clear and central’ for both Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians (p. 9). Nassif therefore envisions an audience comprised of both Evangelicals and Orthodox, and readers of both kinds are expected to gain a fuller awareness of what the gospel has meant for the Church throughout its history. The terms ‘gospel’ and ‘evangelical’ are wisely qualified to avoid confusion with assorted popular conceptions. This allows Nassif to speak of the ‘evangelical ethos’ (p. 12) within Orthodoxy and the gospel as a ‘many-sided mystery’ (p. 13) rather than a narrowly defined dogma. Because the different essays do not necessarily lend themselves to a cohesive flow of thought, the book is divided into two major sections. Part One focuses on the ways that core evangelical traits have always been part of the rich Orthodox tradition. To accomplish this task, Nassif draws heavily from the Ecumenical Councils and from the Philokalia, with special attention given to some neglected Church Fathers. Part Two deals more directly with the relationship between Orthodoxy and Evangelicalism and is somewhat less academic in style. It is here that Nassif’s gracious and generous ecumenical motivations are most manifest. He admirably offers praise about various features of both Evangelicalism and Orthodoxy without refraining from simultaneously making serious criticisms – especially regarding the nominalism of his own Orthodox tradition. Inevitably, there will be some Evangelicals who are unsatisfied with Nassif’s portrayal of their specific branch, but overall, this reviewer was impressed by the tact and precision of this section. In fact, it may even be that some Evangelicals will glean new perspectives about their theological particulars due to the way that Nassif locates them in a broader Christian context. Some of the strongest essays in the first section explore the thinking and theology of St John Chrysostom. The excellence of these contributions largely flows from doctoral research conducted under Fr John Meyendorff. In particular, Nassif’s expert analysis of Chrysostom’s biblical Book Review","PeriodicalId":41530,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"82 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Evangelical Theology of the Orthodox Church by Bradley Nassif\",\"authors\":\"Calum Samuelson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02653788221144422\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this book, Professor Bradley Nassif has provided significant insight that is seldom found anywhere else. Positioned as very few others are, he brings clarity to vital matters within Orthodoxy while using language that is usually associated with other Christian traditions. In doing so, he has crafted a work of tremendous ecumenical importance. Nassif has extensive experience with different branches of Christianity, holding degrees from Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox institutions and having taught in prominent universities from different traditions as well. Perhaps, the best way to describe Nassif’s skill is that he can ‘speak the language’ of each group with fluency. The publication begins with a Foreword from esteemed Professor Andrew Louth, which excellently frames the nature and importance of the work as a whole. Louth helpfully signals the fact that this book is mostly a collection of previously published essays and conference lectures. Nassif’s own introduction (entitled ‘What is the Gospel’) is also useful in setting the tone of the book. The stated goal involves ‘making the gospel clear and central’ for both Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians (p. 9). Nassif therefore envisions an audience comprised of both Evangelicals and Orthodox, and readers of both kinds are expected to gain a fuller awareness of what the gospel has meant for the Church throughout its history. The terms ‘gospel’ and ‘evangelical’ are wisely qualified to avoid confusion with assorted popular conceptions. This allows Nassif to speak of the ‘evangelical ethos’ (p. 12) within Orthodoxy and the gospel as a ‘many-sided mystery’ (p. 13) rather than a narrowly defined dogma. Because the different essays do not necessarily lend themselves to a cohesive flow of thought, the book is divided into two major sections. Part One focuses on the ways that core evangelical traits have always been part of the rich Orthodox tradition. To accomplish this task, Nassif draws heavily from the Ecumenical Councils and from the Philokalia, with special attention given to some neglected Church Fathers. Part Two deals more directly with the relationship between Orthodoxy and Evangelicalism and is somewhat less academic in style. It is here that Nassif’s gracious and generous ecumenical motivations are most manifest. He admirably offers praise about various features of both Evangelicalism and Orthodoxy without refraining from simultaneously making serious criticisms – especially regarding the nominalism of his own Orthodox tradition. Inevitably, there will be some Evangelicals who are unsatisfied with Nassif’s portrayal of their specific branch, but overall, this reviewer was impressed by the tact and precision of this section. In fact, it may even be that some Evangelicals will glean new perspectives about their theological particulars due to the way that Nassif locates them in a broader Christian context. Some of the strongest essays in the first section explore the thinking and theology of St John Chrysostom. The excellence of these contributions largely flows from doctoral research conducted under Fr John Meyendorff. In particular, Nassif’s expert analysis of Chrysostom’s biblical Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":41530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"82 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788221144422\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788221144422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这本书中,布拉德利·纳西夫教授提供了在其他任何地方都很难找到的重要见解。他的定位与其他几个人不同,他在使用通常与其他基督教传统相关的语言时,清晰地阐述了东正教的重要问题。在这样做的过程中,他创作了一部具有巨大的普世重要性的作品。Nassif在基督教的不同分支拥有丰富的经验,拥有新教、天主教和东正教机构的学位,并在不同传统的著名大学任教。也许,描述Nassif技能的最佳方式是,他可以流利地“说”每个群体的语言。该出版物以受人尊敬的安德鲁·劳斯教授的前言开始,该前言出色地概括了整个工作的性质和重要性。劳斯有力地表明,这本书主要是以前发表的论文和会议演讲的合集。纳西夫自己的介绍(题为“什么是福音”)也有助于确定本书的基调。声明的目标包括为东正教和非东正教基督徒“使福音清晰和中心”(第9页)。因此,纳西夫设想的受众包括福音派和东正教,两种类型的读者都希望获得更全面的意识,了解福音对教会整个历史的意义。术语“福音”和“福音派”是明智的限定,以避免混淆与各种流行的概念。这使得Nassif可以将东正教中的“福音派精神”(第12页)和福音称为“多方面的奥秘”(第13页),而不是狭义的教条。由于不同的文章不一定能形成一个连贯的思想流,本书分为两个主要部分。第一部分关注的是福音派的核心特征一直是丰富的东正教传统的一部分。为了完成这项任务,Nassif从大公会议和Philokalia中汲取了大量的经验,并特别关注了一些被忽视的教父。第二部分更直接地讨论东正教和福音派之间的关系,在风格上不那么学术。正是在这里,纳西夫的仁慈和慷慨的普世动机是最明显的。令人钦佩的是,他对福音派和东正教的各种特点都给予了赞扬,同时也没有克制自己进行严肃的批评——特别是关于他自己的东正教传统的唯名论。不可避免的是,会有一些福音派教徒对Nassif对他们特定分支的描述不满意,但总的来说,这个评论家对这一部分的机智和精确印象深刻。事实上,由于纳西夫将他们置于更广阔的基督教背景中,一些福音派教徒甚至可能会对他们的神学细节收集新的观点。第一部分中一些最有力的文章探讨了金口圣若望的思想和神学。这些卓越的贡献主要来自约翰·梅延多夫神父领导下的博士研究。尤其是Nassif对金口的《圣经书评》的专家分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: The Evangelical Theology of the Orthodox Church by Bradley Nassif
In this book, Professor Bradley Nassif has provided significant insight that is seldom found anywhere else. Positioned as very few others are, he brings clarity to vital matters within Orthodoxy while using language that is usually associated with other Christian traditions. In doing so, he has crafted a work of tremendous ecumenical importance. Nassif has extensive experience with different branches of Christianity, holding degrees from Protestant, Catholic and Orthodox institutions and having taught in prominent universities from different traditions as well. Perhaps, the best way to describe Nassif’s skill is that he can ‘speak the language’ of each group with fluency. The publication begins with a Foreword from esteemed Professor Andrew Louth, which excellently frames the nature and importance of the work as a whole. Louth helpfully signals the fact that this book is mostly a collection of previously published essays and conference lectures. Nassif’s own introduction (entitled ‘What is the Gospel’) is also useful in setting the tone of the book. The stated goal involves ‘making the gospel clear and central’ for both Orthodox and non-Orthodox Christians (p. 9). Nassif therefore envisions an audience comprised of both Evangelicals and Orthodox, and readers of both kinds are expected to gain a fuller awareness of what the gospel has meant for the Church throughout its history. The terms ‘gospel’ and ‘evangelical’ are wisely qualified to avoid confusion with assorted popular conceptions. This allows Nassif to speak of the ‘evangelical ethos’ (p. 12) within Orthodoxy and the gospel as a ‘many-sided mystery’ (p. 13) rather than a narrowly defined dogma. Because the different essays do not necessarily lend themselves to a cohesive flow of thought, the book is divided into two major sections. Part One focuses on the ways that core evangelical traits have always been part of the rich Orthodox tradition. To accomplish this task, Nassif draws heavily from the Ecumenical Councils and from the Philokalia, with special attention given to some neglected Church Fathers. Part Two deals more directly with the relationship between Orthodoxy and Evangelicalism and is somewhat less academic in style. It is here that Nassif’s gracious and generous ecumenical motivations are most manifest. He admirably offers praise about various features of both Evangelicalism and Orthodoxy without refraining from simultaneously making serious criticisms – especially regarding the nominalism of his own Orthodox tradition. Inevitably, there will be some Evangelicals who are unsatisfied with Nassif’s portrayal of their specific branch, but overall, this reviewer was impressed by the tact and precision of this section. In fact, it may even be that some Evangelicals will glean new perspectives about their theological particulars due to the way that Nassif locates them in a broader Christian context. Some of the strongest essays in the first section explore the thinking and theology of St John Chrysostom. The excellence of these contributions largely flows from doctoral research conducted under Fr John Meyendorff. In particular, Nassif’s expert analysis of Chrysostom’s biblical Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Tambaram, 1938: Christianity's shift to the Global South Religious pluralism, public religion, and principled pluralism in Indonesia TRN regnum book notice Book Review: Christ-Followers in Other Religions: The Global Witness of Insider Movements by Darren Todd Duerksen Charism and Liturgy: Elements of the Orthodox Theological Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1