C. Plard , S. Fanello , F. Paré , J.-L. Racineux , M. Drouet
{"title":"全科医学过敏主诉的流行病学","authors":"C. Plard , S. Fanello , F. Paré , J.-L. Racineux , M. Drouet","doi":"10.1016/j.allerg.2008.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Allergic conditions account for a large proportion of chronic diseases. Here, the presenting complaints of patients with allergic diseases seen in consultation with three general practitioners are compared with published epidemiologic data. Questionnaires from 346 patients (mean age 36.3 years, 213 women:133 men) were available for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the allergy as seen by the patients and that observed by the doctor (28.9% versus 35.3%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.09). Seventy-six percent of the allergic patients said that they had previously consulted their generalist for this problem. Forty-two percent reported a positive family history of allergy (63% of the allergic patients versus 33.3% of the nonallergic patients, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent complaint, reported by 19.8% of the patients, followed by conjunctivitis (14.4%), eczema (11.9%), asthma (7.6%), urticaria (5.8%), and angioedema (3.2%). For each of these complaints, the doctor's evaluation was practically identical. Food allergy, all complaints included, was claimed by 4% of the patients but food allergy was recognized by only 0.3% of the doctors. Drug allergy was reported by 10.8% of the patients and recognized as such by 7.8% of the doctors. In conclusion, the results of this study on allergic complaints reported by patients seen in general practice demonstrate no overvaluation of these complaints by the patients. These results are difficult to compare with published data, which are disparate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":92953,"journal":{"name":"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique","volume":"48 7","pages":"Pages 476-486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.allerg.2008.06.011","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Épidémiologie de la plainte allergique en médecine générale\",\"authors\":\"C. Plard , S. Fanello , F. Paré , J.-L. Racineux , M. Drouet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.allerg.2008.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Allergic conditions account for a large proportion of chronic diseases. Here, the presenting complaints of patients with allergic diseases seen in consultation with three general practitioners are compared with published epidemiologic data. Questionnaires from 346 patients (mean age 36.3 years, 213 women:133 men) were available for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the allergy as seen by the patients and that observed by the doctor (28.9% versus 35.3%, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.09). Seventy-six percent of the allergic patients said that they had previously consulted their generalist for this problem. Forty-two percent reported a positive family history of allergy (63% of the allergic patients versus 33.3% of the nonallergic patients, <em>P</em> <!--><<!--> <!-->0.001). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent complaint, reported by 19.8% of the patients, followed by conjunctivitis (14.4%), eczema (11.9%), asthma (7.6%), urticaria (5.8%), and angioedema (3.2%). For each of these complaints, the doctor's evaluation was practically identical. Food allergy, all complaints included, was claimed by 4% of the patients but food allergy was recognized by only 0.3% of the doctors. Drug allergy was reported by 10.8% of the patients and recognized as such by 7.8% of the doctors. In conclusion, the results of this study on allergic complaints reported by patients seen in general practice demonstrate no overvaluation of these complaints by the patients. These results are difficult to compare with published data, which are disparate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique\",\"volume\":\"48 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 476-486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.allerg.2008.06.011\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0335745708001822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue francaise d'allergologie et d'immunologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0335745708001822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
过敏性疾病在慢性疾病中占很大比例。本文将三名全科医生会诊的过敏性疾病患者的主诉与已发表的流行病学数据进行比较。来自346名患者(平均年龄36.3岁,213名女性:133名男性)的问卷可用于分析。患者观察到的过敏与医生观察到的过敏无统计学差异(28.9% vs 35.3%, P = 0.09)。76%的过敏患者表示,他们之前就这个问题咨询过他们的全科医生。42%的人报告有阳性的过敏家族史(63%的过敏患者对33.3%的非过敏患者,P <0.001)。变应性鼻炎是最常见的主诉,占19.8%,其次是结膜炎(14.4%)、湿疹(11.9%)、哮喘(7.6%)、荨麻疹(5.8%)和血管性水肿(3.2%)。对于这些抱怨,医生的评价几乎是相同的。食物过敏,包括所有的抱怨,有4%的病人声称有食物过敏,但只有0.3%的医生承认有食物过敏。10.8%的患者报告有药物过敏,7.8%的医生认为有药物过敏。总之,本研究的结果过敏投诉报告的病人看到在一般做法表明没有高估这些投诉的病人。这些结果很难与已发表的数据进行比较,因为它们完全不同。
Épidémiologie de la plainte allergique en médecine générale
Allergic conditions account for a large proportion of chronic diseases. Here, the presenting complaints of patients with allergic diseases seen in consultation with three general practitioners are compared with published epidemiologic data. Questionnaires from 346 patients (mean age 36.3 years, 213 women:133 men) were available for analysis. There was no statistically significant difference between the allergy as seen by the patients and that observed by the doctor (28.9% versus 35.3%, P = 0.09). Seventy-six percent of the allergic patients said that they had previously consulted their generalist for this problem. Forty-two percent reported a positive family history of allergy (63% of the allergic patients versus 33.3% of the nonallergic patients, P < 0.001). Allergic rhinitis was the most frequent complaint, reported by 19.8% of the patients, followed by conjunctivitis (14.4%), eczema (11.9%), asthma (7.6%), urticaria (5.8%), and angioedema (3.2%). For each of these complaints, the doctor's evaluation was practically identical. Food allergy, all complaints included, was claimed by 4% of the patients but food allergy was recognized by only 0.3% of the doctors. Drug allergy was reported by 10.8% of the patients and recognized as such by 7.8% of the doctors. In conclusion, the results of this study on allergic complaints reported by patients seen in general practice demonstrate no overvaluation of these complaints by the patients. These results are difficult to compare with published data, which are disparate.