虹膜曲率的定量测量及其在评价主角闭合嫌疑犯虹膜曲率变化中的应用

Zhiwei Xu, Haijian Wu
{"title":"虹膜曲率的定量测量及其在评价主角闭合嫌疑犯虹膜曲率变化中的应用","authors":"Zhiwei Xu, Haijian Wu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo evaluate the accuracy of the quantitative measurement of iris curvature by Rhinoceros and to assess the changes iniris curvature in primary angle closure suspect after laser periphery iridectomy (LPI). \n \n \nMethods: \nThis was a prospective study. Sixteen patients (16 eyes) with primary angle closure suspect (PACS) who planned to undergo LPI treatment in Taizhou Municipal Hospital were selected. The anterior segment images of different axes were captured by Allegro Oculyzer. The curvature radius of the anterior iris surface was quantitatively measured by Rhinoceros 5.0. The repeatability of image capturing and image measurement was assessed. The iris curvature of the patients with PACS was compared before and after LPI. Sixteen normal persons (16 eyes) matched for age, sex, and pupil size were selected as the control group. The iris curvature was compared between the PACS and control groups. The correlation between iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume and peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the PACS group were analyzed. The correlation between changes in iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, and 6 mm peripheral anterior chamber depth before and after LPI treatment were also analyzed. A paired t test, independent t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults: \nThe coefficient of variation of anterior segment image capturing was 3.02%. The coefficient of variation of anterior segment image measurement was 2.54%. The radius of the iris curvature in the PACS group was 7.81±1.63 mm, which increased to 9.20±2.22 mm after LPI (t=-9.45, P<0.001). The radius of the iris curvature in the control group was 9.99±4.00 mm. The difference between the PACS group and control group was statistically significant (t=-5.69, P<0.001). After correction for the central anterior chamber depth, there was a correlation between the iris curvature radius in the direction of 0° (r=0.879, P<0.001), 90° (r=0.684, P=0.005), 180° (r=0.619, P=0.014), 270° (r=0.740, P=0.002) and the peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. After the treatment with LPI, except for the direction of 270° (r=0.453, P=0.078), there was a correlation between the changes in iris curvature in the direction of 0° (r=0.693, P=0.003), 90° (r=0.560, P=0.024), 180° (r=0.580, P=0.019) and the changes in peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. \n \n \nConclusions: \nThis quantitative measurement of iris curvature has good accuracy and repeatability. It can be used for the early diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic effect of PACS. \n \n \nKey words: \niris curvature; quantitative measurement; primary angle closure suspect","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"21 1","pages":"14-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Measurement of Iris Curvature and Its Application in Evaluating the Changes in Iris Curvature in Primary Angle Closure Suspect\",\"authors\":\"Zhiwei Xu, Haijian Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo evaluate the accuracy of the quantitative measurement of iris curvature by Rhinoceros and to assess the changes iniris curvature in primary angle closure suspect after laser periphery iridectomy (LPI). \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nThis was a prospective study. Sixteen patients (16 eyes) with primary angle closure suspect (PACS) who planned to undergo LPI treatment in Taizhou Municipal Hospital were selected. The anterior segment images of different axes were captured by Allegro Oculyzer. The curvature radius of the anterior iris surface was quantitatively measured by Rhinoceros 5.0. The repeatability of image capturing and image measurement was assessed. The iris curvature of the patients with PACS was compared before and after LPI. Sixteen normal persons (16 eyes) matched for age, sex, and pupil size were selected as the control group. The iris curvature was compared between the PACS and control groups. The correlation between iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume and peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the PACS group were analyzed. The correlation between changes in iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, and 6 mm peripheral anterior chamber depth before and after LPI treatment were also analyzed. A paired t test, independent t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nThe coefficient of variation of anterior segment image capturing was 3.02%. The coefficient of variation of anterior segment image measurement was 2.54%. The radius of the iris curvature in the PACS group was 7.81±1.63 mm, which increased to 9.20±2.22 mm after LPI (t=-9.45, P<0.001). The radius of the iris curvature in the control group was 9.99±4.00 mm. The difference between the PACS group and control group was statistically significant (t=-5.69, P<0.001). After correction for the central anterior chamber depth, there was a correlation between the iris curvature radius in the direction of 0° (r=0.879, P<0.001), 90° (r=0.684, P=0.005), 180° (r=0.619, P=0.014), 270° (r=0.740, P=0.002) and the peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. After the treatment with LPI, except for the direction of 270° (r=0.453, P=0.078), there was a correlation between the changes in iris curvature in the direction of 0° (r=0.693, P=0.003), 90° (r=0.560, P=0.024), 180° (r=0.580, P=0.019) and the changes in peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nThis quantitative measurement of iris curvature has good accuracy and repeatability. It can be used for the early diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic effect of PACS. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\niris curvature; quantitative measurement; primary angle closure suspect\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"14-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2020.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价犀牛定量测量虹膜曲率的准确性,评价激光周围虹膜切除术(LPI)原发性闭角疑似患者虹膜曲率的变化。方法:前瞻性研究。选取拟在泰州市市立医院行LPI治疗的原发性闭角疑似患者16例(16眼)。利用Allegro Oculyzer采集不同轴向的前段图像。采用Rhinoceros 5.0软件定量测量虹膜前表面曲率半径。评估了图像采集和图像测量的重复性。比较PACS患者LPI前后的虹膜曲率。选取年龄、性别、瞳孔大小相匹配的正常人16人(16只眼)作为对照组。比较PACS组和对照组的虹膜曲率。分析PACS组虹膜曲率与中央前房深度、前房容积、周围前房深度6 mm的相关性。分析LPI治疗前后虹膜曲率变化与中央前房深度、前房容积、周围前房6mm深度的相关性。采用配对t检验、独立t检验和Pearson相关系数进行统计分析。结果:前段图像采集变异系数为3.02%。前段图像测量变异系数为2.54%。PACS组虹膜曲率半径为7.81±1.63 mm, LPI后增加到9.20±2.22 mm (t=-9.45, P<0.001)。对照组虹膜曲率半径为9.99±4.00 mm。PACS组与对照组比较,差异有统计学意义(t=-5.69, P<0.001)。中央前房深度校正后,虹膜曲率半径在0°方向(r=0.879, P<0.001)、90°方向(r=0.684, P=0.005)、180°方向(r=0.619, P=0.014)、270°方向(r=0.740, P=0.002)与相应方向6 mm处周围前房深度存在相关性。LPI治疗后,除270°方向(r=0.453, P=0.078)外,虹膜曲率在0°方向(r=0.693, P=0.003)、90°方向(r=0.560, P=0.024)、180°方向(r=0.580, P=0.019)的变化与相应方向6 mm处周围前房深度的变化均有相关性。结论:该方法定量测定虹膜曲率具有良好的准确性和重复性。可用于早期诊断和定量评价PACS的治疗效果。关键词:虹膜曲率;定量测定;主角闭合怀疑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantitative Measurement of Iris Curvature and Its Application in Evaluating the Changes in Iris Curvature in Primary Angle Closure Suspect
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of the quantitative measurement of iris curvature by Rhinoceros and to assess the changes iniris curvature in primary angle closure suspect after laser periphery iridectomy (LPI). Methods: This was a prospective study. Sixteen patients (16 eyes) with primary angle closure suspect (PACS) who planned to undergo LPI treatment in Taizhou Municipal Hospital were selected. The anterior segment images of different axes were captured by Allegro Oculyzer. The curvature radius of the anterior iris surface was quantitatively measured by Rhinoceros 5.0. The repeatability of image capturing and image measurement was assessed. The iris curvature of the patients with PACS was compared before and after LPI. Sixteen normal persons (16 eyes) matched for age, sex, and pupil size were selected as the control group. The iris curvature was compared between the PACS and control groups. The correlation between iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume and peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the PACS group were analyzed. The correlation between changes in iris curvature and central anterior chamber depth, anterior chamber volume, and 6 mm peripheral anterior chamber depth before and after LPI treatment were also analyzed. A paired t test, independent t test and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for statistical analysis. Results: The coefficient of variation of anterior segment image capturing was 3.02%. The coefficient of variation of anterior segment image measurement was 2.54%. The radius of the iris curvature in the PACS group was 7.81±1.63 mm, which increased to 9.20±2.22 mm after LPI (t=-9.45, P<0.001). The radius of the iris curvature in the control group was 9.99±4.00 mm. The difference between the PACS group and control group was statistically significant (t=-5.69, P<0.001). After correction for the central anterior chamber depth, there was a correlation between the iris curvature radius in the direction of 0° (r=0.879, P<0.001), 90° (r=0.684, P=0.005), 180° (r=0.619, P=0.014), 270° (r=0.740, P=0.002) and the peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. After the treatment with LPI, except for the direction of 270° (r=0.453, P=0.078), there was a correlation between the changes in iris curvature in the direction of 0° (r=0.693, P=0.003), 90° (r=0.560, P=0.024), 180° (r=0.580, P=0.019) and the changes in peripheral anterior chamber depth at 6 mm in the corresponding directions. Conclusions: This quantitative measurement of iris curvature has good accuracy and repeatability. It can be used for the early diagnosis and quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic effect of PACS. Key words: iris curvature; quantitative measurement; primary angle closure suspect
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1