如何为《小组工作专家期刊》(JSGW)编委会成员进行评审

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal for Specialists in Group Work Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940
Kristopher M. Goodrich, Gerard T. Bartlett, Cassandra Hirdes, Lia D. Falco
{"title":"如何为《小组工作专家期刊》(JSGW)编委会成员进行评审","authors":"Kristopher M. Goodrich, Gerard T. Bartlett, Cassandra Hirdes, Lia D. Falco","doi":"10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although peer review is the cornerstone of scientific and scholarly publication, very few people receive training to do this during their graduate education. The process of peer review involves having others of equal or greater expertise in a subject area critique or comment on work that is submitted to a journal. This process can be blind (i.e., the Associate or Action Editors know identity of the author(s) but the reviewers do not), or “double-blind” (i.e., the author identity is unknown to both the Action or Associate Editor and the reviewers). A manuscript that is peer reviewed is sometimes called “refereed.” The benefit of the process is that, when done well, it creates stronger, clearer publications which contribute to quality in the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is not meant to serve as a barrier to publication, rather it exists to ensure publications in professional journals are the best possible quality and can be disseminated worldwide. Further, none of this can be accomplished without other scholars and practitioners in the field who volunteer to perform this service. Serving as a member of a journal’s editorial review board is one of the most important roles that one can take in a professional association. Reviewers are an integral part of the publication process, supporting the journal in vetting and supporting authors to move manuscripts through the editorial process. Their work is key in ensuring that manuscripts are appropriate to the scope and mission of the journal (and the association it falls within), that the piece has the appropriate depth and breadth to add new knowledge into the field for practice and scholarly knowledge, as well as ensuring that authors write the work in a way that our broad group of readers may be able to understand and integrate the work into whatever their professional areas may be. It is surprising, then, that although we as a field recognize the importance that editorial board membership, and the process they engage in, that little is discussed or trained within graduate schools to prepare individuals to take on this important service. Often times, we find that our members are hesitant to take on these roles because of the little training or attention that editorial board service has previous had in their professional career. More often than not, we have found that most people we have interacted with have taken on these roles because they were “invited” by editorial or professional association leadership due to small review board numbers, and a need to fill slots. Others may feel external pressure to perform this service as a requirement for tenure and promotion. Additionally, these individuals often appear hesitant to take on these roles, due to the little training they have received. However, they do all report recognizing the importance of these roles, as well as an acknowledgment of the thing we often report to our authors: if you want to learn how to better write for a journal, join the review board (as an ad hoc or full editorial board member). The process of reading other persons’ manuscripts, as well as watching the process of seeing manuscripts move through the system, can demystify the process and empower early career scholars to become more effective writers and reviewers. Therefore, THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2022, VOL. 47, NOS. 3–4, 169–175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940","PeriodicalId":45501,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Review for the Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) Editorial Board Member Basics\",\"authors\":\"Kristopher M. Goodrich, Gerard T. Bartlett, Cassandra Hirdes, Lia D. Falco\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although peer review is the cornerstone of scientific and scholarly publication, very few people receive training to do this during their graduate education. The process of peer review involves having others of equal or greater expertise in a subject area critique or comment on work that is submitted to a journal. This process can be blind (i.e., the Associate or Action Editors know identity of the author(s) but the reviewers do not), or “double-blind” (i.e., the author identity is unknown to both the Action or Associate Editor and the reviewers). A manuscript that is peer reviewed is sometimes called “refereed.” The benefit of the process is that, when done well, it creates stronger, clearer publications which contribute to quality in the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is not meant to serve as a barrier to publication, rather it exists to ensure publications in professional journals are the best possible quality and can be disseminated worldwide. Further, none of this can be accomplished without other scholars and practitioners in the field who volunteer to perform this service. Serving as a member of a journal’s editorial review board is one of the most important roles that one can take in a professional association. Reviewers are an integral part of the publication process, supporting the journal in vetting and supporting authors to move manuscripts through the editorial process. Their work is key in ensuring that manuscripts are appropriate to the scope and mission of the journal (and the association it falls within), that the piece has the appropriate depth and breadth to add new knowledge into the field for practice and scholarly knowledge, as well as ensuring that authors write the work in a way that our broad group of readers may be able to understand and integrate the work into whatever their professional areas may be. It is surprising, then, that although we as a field recognize the importance that editorial board membership, and the process they engage in, that little is discussed or trained within graduate schools to prepare individuals to take on this important service. Often times, we find that our members are hesitant to take on these roles because of the little training or attention that editorial board service has previous had in their professional career. More often than not, we have found that most people we have interacted with have taken on these roles because they were “invited” by editorial or professional association leadership due to small review board numbers, and a need to fill slots. Others may feel external pressure to perform this service as a requirement for tenure and promotion. Additionally, these individuals often appear hesitant to take on these roles, due to the little training they have received. However, they do all report recognizing the importance of these roles, as well as an acknowledgment of the thing we often report to our authors: if you want to learn how to better write for a journal, join the review board (as an ad hoc or full editorial board member). The process of reading other persons’ manuscripts, as well as watching the process of seeing manuscripts move through the system, can demystify the process and empower early career scholars to become more effective writers and reviewers. Therefore, THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2022, VOL. 47, NOS. 3–4, 169–175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940\",\"PeriodicalId\":45501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Specialists in Group Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Specialists in Group Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Specialists in Group Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然同行评议是科学和学术出版的基石,但很少有人在研究生教育期间接受过这方面的培训。同行评议的过程包括让在某一学科领域具有同等或更高专业知识的其他人对提交给期刊的工作进行评论或评论。这个过程可以是盲目的(例如,助理编辑或行动编辑知道作者的身份,但审稿人不知道),或者是“双盲”的(例如,作者的身份对行动编辑或副编辑和审稿人都是未知的)。经过同行评审的手稿有时被称为“refered”。这个过程的好处是,如果做得好,它会创造出更强大、更清晰的出版物,从而有助于提高知识进步的质量。同行评议并不是要成为出版的障碍,而是为了确保专业期刊上的出版物具有尽可能高的质量,并能够在全世界传播。此外,如果没有该领域的其他学者和从业者自愿提供这项服务,这一切都不可能完成。作为期刊编辑评审委员会的成员是一个人在专业协会中可以担任的最重要的角色之一。审稿人是出版过程中不可或缺的一部分,支持期刊审查并支持作者将手稿通过编辑过程。他们的工作是确保手稿适合期刊的范围和使命(以及它所属的协会)的关键,这篇文章有适当的深度和广度,可以为实践和学术知识领域增加新的知识,以及确保作者以一种我们广泛的读者群体能够理解和整合工作的方式写作,无论他们的专业领域可能是什么。因此,令人惊讶的是,尽管我们作为一个领域认识到编委会成员的重要性,以及他们参与的过程,但在研究生院中,很少有人讨论或培训个人准备承担这项重要的服务。很多时候,我们发现我们的成员对担任这些角色犹豫不决,因为编辑委员会服务在他们的职业生涯中很少受到培训或关注。我们经常发现,我们接触过的大多数人之所以担任这些角色,是因为他们是被编辑或专业协会领导“邀请”的,因为审查委员会人数不多,而且需要填补空缺。其他人可能会感到外部压力,作为终身任职和晋升的必要条件而提供这项服务。此外,由于他们接受的培训很少,这些人往往表现得犹豫不决。然而,他们都承认这些角色的重要性,以及我们经常向作者报告的一件事:如果你想学习如何更好地为期刊写作,加入评审委员会(作为临时或正式的编辑委员会成员)。阅读他人手稿的过程,以及观察手稿通过系统的过程,可以揭开这个过程的神秘面纱,并使早期的职业学者成为更有效的作家和评论家。因此,《小组工作专家期刊2022》,第47卷,第3-4期,169-175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to Review for the Journal for Specialists in Group Work (JSGW) Editorial Board Member Basics
Although peer review is the cornerstone of scientific and scholarly publication, very few people receive training to do this during their graduate education. The process of peer review involves having others of equal or greater expertise in a subject area critique or comment on work that is submitted to a journal. This process can be blind (i.e., the Associate or Action Editors know identity of the author(s) but the reviewers do not), or “double-blind” (i.e., the author identity is unknown to both the Action or Associate Editor and the reviewers). A manuscript that is peer reviewed is sometimes called “refereed.” The benefit of the process is that, when done well, it creates stronger, clearer publications which contribute to quality in the advancement of knowledge. Peer review is not meant to serve as a barrier to publication, rather it exists to ensure publications in professional journals are the best possible quality and can be disseminated worldwide. Further, none of this can be accomplished without other scholars and practitioners in the field who volunteer to perform this service. Serving as a member of a journal’s editorial review board is one of the most important roles that one can take in a professional association. Reviewers are an integral part of the publication process, supporting the journal in vetting and supporting authors to move manuscripts through the editorial process. Their work is key in ensuring that manuscripts are appropriate to the scope and mission of the journal (and the association it falls within), that the piece has the appropriate depth and breadth to add new knowledge into the field for practice and scholarly knowledge, as well as ensuring that authors write the work in a way that our broad group of readers may be able to understand and integrate the work into whatever their professional areas may be. It is surprising, then, that although we as a field recognize the importance that editorial board membership, and the process they engage in, that little is discussed or trained within graduate schools to prepare individuals to take on this important service. Often times, we find that our members are hesitant to take on these roles because of the little training or attention that editorial board service has previous had in their professional career. More often than not, we have found that most people we have interacted with have taken on these roles because they were “invited” by editorial or professional association leadership due to small review board numbers, and a need to fill slots. Others may feel external pressure to perform this service as a requirement for tenure and promotion. Additionally, these individuals often appear hesitant to take on these roles, due to the little training they have received. However, they do all report recognizing the importance of these roles, as well as an acknowledgment of the thing we often report to our authors: if you want to learn how to better write for a journal, join the review board (as an ad hoc or full editorial board member). The process of reading other persons’ manuscripts, as well as watching the process of seeing manuscripts move through the system, can demystify the process and empower early career scholars to become more effective writers and reviewers. Therefore, THE JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN GROUP WORK 2022, VOL. 47, NOS. 3–4, 169–175 https://doi.org/10.1080/01933922.2022.2129940
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Experiential Group Training in Developing Leadership Self-Efficacy of Counselors-In-Training Using Reflecting Teams in Solution-Focused Group Counseling Experiential Training for Master’s Students Exploring Multimodality with Online Peer-Facilitated Experiential Learning in Group Work Training The Achieving Success Everyday (ASE) Group Counseling Model Applied in Rural Schools: Implications for Future School Counselor Training and Practice Examining a Cohesion-Focused Model in Experiential Growth Groups: A Single Case Research Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1