共识市场假说:这不是市场操纵指南

Constantine Ignatenko
{"title":"共识市场假说:这不是市场操纵指南","authors":"Constantine Ignatenko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3849315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a general eclectic theoretical framework that attempts to provide another practical understanding of how the market works and how to invest with chaos, non-ergodicity and inefficiency. It covers bubbles, corrections, volatility, correlation disturbances in crises by means of behaviorism and aspects of information, game and chaos theories and how market reality as a consensus is shaped. The article also touches on equilibrium as a reflection of expected normality, the danger of market “efficiency” in the light of non-ergodicity, information diffusion with market manipulation, the relativity of rationality, why pumping and bubbles are natural and why we should lower short-term capital gains taxes to the level of long-term ones in order to support the sustainability of the market. Current regulation and taxation policies jeopardize the long-term market's sustainability by undermining diversity and inclusion. <br><br>Old orthodox academic theories and views in financial economics are contradictory not only to themselves but also to the reasonableness and meaning of the entire industry. The author is a practitioner who is not bound by academia in financial economics. This article is written in a straightforward style that is more typical for essays. It skips the evolution of economic thought as well as obvious criticisms, and the function is to transmit and communicate with a broad audience. <br><br>","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus Market Hypothesis: This is Not a Guide to Market Manipulation\",\"authors\":\"Constantine Ignatenko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3849315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a general eclectic theoretical framework that attempts to provide another practical understanding of how the market works and how to invest with chaos, non-ergodicity and inefficiency. It covers bubbles, corrections, volatility, correlation disturbances in crises by means of behaviorism and aspects of information, game and chaos theories and how market reality as a consensus is shaped. The article also touches on equilibrium as a reflection of expected normality, the danger of market “efficiency” in the light of non-ergodicity, information diffusion with market manipulation, the relativity of rationality, why pumping and bubbles are natural and why we should lower short-term capital gains taxes to the level of long-term ones in order to support the sustainability of the market. Current regulation and taxation policies jeopardize the long-term market's sustainability by undermining diversity and inclusion. <br><br>Old orthodox academic theories and views in financial economics are contradictory not only to themselves but also to the reasonableness and meaning of the entire industry. The author is a practitioner who is not bound by academia in financial economics. This article is written in a straightforward style that is more typical for essays. It skips the evolution of economic thought as well as obvious criticisms, and the function is to transmit and communicate with a broad audience. <br><br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这是一个折衷的理论框架,试图为市场如何运作以及如何在混乱、非遍历性和低效率的情况下进行投资提供另一种实用的理解。它涵盖了泡沫、修正、波动、危机中的相关干扰,通过行为主义和信息、游戏和混沌理论的各个方面,以及市场现实作为共识是如何形成的。本文还涉及均衡作为预期常态的反映,在非重复的情况下市场“效率”的危险,市场操纵的信息扩散,理性的相对性,为什么抽吸和泡沫是自然的,为什么我们应该将短期资本利得税降低到长期的水平,以支持市场的可持续性。目前的监管和税收政策破坏了多样性和包容性,从而危及市场的长期可持续性。传统正统的金融经济学学术理论和观点不仅与自身相矛盾,而且与整个行业的合理性和意义相矛盾。作者是不受学术束缚的金融经济学实践者。这篇文章是用一种更典型的散文风格写的。它跳过了经济思想的演变和明显的批评,其功能是与广泛的受众进行传播和交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus Market Hypothesis: This is Not a Guide to Market Manipulation
This is a general eclectic theoretical framework that attempts to provide another practical understanding of how the market works and how to invest with chaos, non-ergodicity and inefficiency. It covers bubbles, corrections, volatility, correlation disturbances in crises by means of behaviorism and aspects of information, game and chaos theories and how market reality as a consensus is shaped. The article also touches on equilibrium as a reflection of expected normality, the danger of market “efficiency” in the light of non-ergodicity, information diffusion with market manipulation, the relativity of rationality, why pumping and bubbles are natural and why we should lower short-term capital gains taxes to the level of long-term ones in order to support the sustainability of the market. Current regulation and taxation policies jeopardize the long-term market's sustainability by undermining diversity and inclusion.

Old orthodox academic theories and views in financial economics are contradictory not only to themselves but also to the reasonableness and meaning of the entire industry. The author is a practitioner who is not bound by academia in financial economics. This article is written in a straightforward style that is more typical for essays. It skips the evolution of economic thought as well as obvious criticisms, and the function is to transmit and communicate with a broad audience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does Religious Diversity Play Roles in Corporate Environmental Decisions? Distrust or Speculation? The Socioeconomic Drivers of U.S. Cryptocurrency Investments The Efficient Horizon of Expectation and Stock Prices Being Present: The Influence of Mindfulness on Financial Decisions Algorithmic Trading in Experimental Markets with Human Traders: A Literature Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1