合作社的问责制和透明度:葡萄牙和德国的比较分析

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS REVESCO-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos Pub Date : 2022-10-06 DOI:10.5209/reve.83721
Deolinda Meira, Ana Maria Bandeira, Melanie Santos
{"title":"合作社的问责制和透明度:葡萄牙和德国的比较分析","authors":"Deolinda Meira, Ana Maria Bandeira, Melanie Santos","doi":"10.5209/reve.83721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" \n This study aims to assess whether the legislation on internal and external supervisory mechanisms in force for German cooperatives allows for a more adequate accountability and transparency in terms of financial reporting compared to the model adopted in Portugal. For this purpose, and through a qualitative methodology, using the content analysis technique and the multiple case study model, total and partial compliance indexes were constructed by country to assess the cooperatives' transparency and accountability in the selected sample. The results show that the analysed cooperatives present a compliance index higher than 50% in all the selected categories. However, in all categories, German cooperatives present a higher percentage than Portuguese cooperatives, thus leading to the main conclusion that the German model of internal and external supervision provides a higher level of accountability and transparency.\n ","PeriodicalId":43928,"journal":{"name":"REVESCO-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accountability and Transparency in Cooperatives: A Comparative Analysis between Portugal and Germany\",\"authors\":\"Deolinda Meira, Ana Maria Bandeira, Melanie Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/reve.83721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" \\n This study aims to assess whether the legislation on internal and external supervisory mechanisms in force for German cooperatives allows for a more adequate accountability and transparency in terms of financial reporting compared to the model adopted in Portugal. For this purpose, and through a qualitative methodology, using the content analysis technique and the multiple case study model, total and partial compliance indexes were constructed by country to assess the cooperatives' transparency and accountability in the selected sample. The results show that the analysed cooperatives present a compliance index higher than 50% in all the selected categories. However, in all categories, German cooperatives present a higher percentage than Portuguese cooperatives, thus leading to the main conclusion that the German model of internal and external supervision provides a higher level of accountability and transparency.\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":43928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVESCO-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVESCO-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.83721\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVESCO-Revista de Estudios Cooperativos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/reve.83721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估与葡萄牙采用的模式相比,德国合作社现行的内部和外部监督机制立法是否允许在财务报告方面实现更充分的问责制和透明度。为此,通过定性方法,采用内容分析技术和多案例研究模型,构建了国家总体和部分合规指标,以评估选定样本中合作社的透明度和问责性。结果表明,所分析的合作社在所有选定类别中的合规指数均高于50%。然而,在所有类别中,德国合作社所占的百分比都高于葡萄牙合作社,因此得出的主要结论是,德国的内部和外部监督模式提供了更高水平的问责制和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accountability and Transparency in Cooperatives: A Comparative Analysis between Portugal and Germany
   This study aims to assess whether the legislation on internal and external supervisory mechanisms in force for German cooperatives allows for a more adequate accountability and transparency in terms of financial reporting compared to the model adopted in Portugal. For this purpose, and through a qualitative methodology, using the content analysis technique and the multiple case study model, total and partial compliance indexes were constructed by country to assess the cooperatives' transparency and accountability in the selected sample. The results show that the analysed cooperatives present a compliance index higher than 50% in all the selected categories. However, in all categories, German cooperatives present a higher percentage than Portuguese cooperatives, thus leading to the main conclusion that the German model of internal and external supervision provides a higher level of accountability and transparency.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Explorando potencialidades y desafíos de la gestión horizontal: Un estudio mixto de dos cooperativas de trabajo de software en Argentina El valor social generado por los centros especiales de empleo en España: comparación de dos enfoques de monetización Presenting a new sequential methodology to design, test, and scale Sustainable Business Models Cooperativismo de ahorro y crédito como línea de investigación científica: un análisis bibliométrico Influencia de los factores institucionales en el desarrollo y consolidación de Negocios inclusivos con pequeños agricultores en la base de la pirámide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1