海岸海豚种群的标记再捕获与样线丰度估算:以巴西南部拉古纳的truncatus为例

F. Daura-Jorge, P. C. Simões‐Lopes
{"title":"海岸海豚种群的标记再捕获与样线丰度估算:以巴西南部拉古纳的truncatus为例","authors":"F. Daura-Jorge, P. C. Simões‐Lopes","doi":"10.5597/LAJAM00222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cetacean populations in coastal habitats are increasingly threatened by multiple anthropogenic impacts. Monitoring these populations to obtain robust estimates of abundance and detect trends over time is critical to achieve conservation goals. Here, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of two commonly used abundance estimation methods: mark-recapture and distance sampling line-transect. Surveys were conducted to estimate the abundance of bottlenose dolphins in Laguna, southern Brazil. We implemented power-analysis models and compared both techniques in terms of cost, time and effectiveness to detect trends over a five-year period. Mark-recapture models were analyzed in MARK and resulted in an abundance of 50 individuals (CI = 39-64) with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.13. The line-transect models were implemented using the program DISTANCE and resulted in an estimate of 62 individuals (CI = 38-103), with a CV of 0.24. Comparing both approaches, mark-recapture resulted 1.30 time more expensive than line-transect for a single season of effort, but was twice as effective in terms of precision. As a consequence, the probability of detecting a 5% trend during a five-year period is 2.08 times higher with mark recapture. Conversely, the final cost to detect a trend with distance sampling is 1.19 time higher but considering six more years of effort. These results highlight the importance of selecting a-priori sampling design techniques that include developing pilot studies that evaluate the bias, precision and accuracy of estimates while considering costs involved. Considering the small population size estimated herein, the sensitivity of both approaches for detecting trends is not sufficient because the original population would be markedly reduced by the time a declining trend was detected. Thus, a precautionary approach is still imperative, even when robust estimates are obtained.","PeriodicalId":17967,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals","volume":"1 1","pages":"133-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mark-recapture vs. line-transect abundance estimates of a coastal dolphin population: a case study of Tursiops truncatus from Laguna, southern Brazil\",\"authors\":\"F. Daura-Jorge, P. C. Simões‐Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.5597/LAJAM00222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cetacean populations in coastal habitats are increasingly threatened by multiple anthropogenic impacts. Monitoring these populations to obtain robust estimates of abundance and detect trends over time is critical to achieve conservation goals. Here, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of two commonly used abundance estimation methods: mark-recapture and distance sampling line-transect. Surveys were conducted to estimate the abundance of bottlenose dolphins in Laguna, southern Brazil. We implemented power-analysis models and compared both techniques in terms of cost, time and effectiveness to detect trends over a five-year period. Mark-recapture models were analyzed in MARK and resulted in an abundance of 50 individuals (CI = 39-64) with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.13. The line-transect models were implemented using the program DISTANCE and resulted in an estimate of 62 individuals (CI = 38-103), with a CV of 0.24. Comparing both approaches, mark-recapture resulted 1.30 time more expensive than line-transect for a single season of effort, but was twice as effective in terms of precision. As a consequence, the probability of detecting a 5% trend during a five-year period is 2.08 times higher with mark recapture. Conversely, the final cost to detect a trend with distance sampling is 1.19 time higher but considering six more years of effort. These results highlight the importance of selecting a-priori sampling design techniques that include developing pilot studies that evaluate the bias, precision and accuracy of estimates while considering costs involved. Considering the small population size estimated herein, the sensitivity of both approaches for detecting trends is not sufficient because the original population would be markedly reduced by the time a declining trend was detected. Thus, a precautionary approach is still imperative, even when robust estimates are obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"133-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5597/LAJAM00222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5597/LAJAM00222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

沿海生境的鲸类种群正日益受到多重人为影响的威胁。监测这些种群,以获得可靠的丰度估计,并发现随着时间的变化趋势,对实现保护目标至关重要。在这里,我们进行了一项初步研究,以评估两种常用的丰度估计方法的有效性:标记重新捕获和距离采样样线。在巴西南部的拉古纳进行了调查,以估计宽吻海豚的数量。我们实施了功率分析模型,并在成本、时间和有效性方面比较了两种技术,以检测五年内的趋势。在MARK中分析标记-再捕获模型,结果丰度为50个个体(CI = 39-64),变异系数(CV)为0.13。使用DISTANCE程序实现样线模型,结果估计有62个个体(CI = 38-103), CV为0.24。比较这两种方法,在一个季节的工作中,标记重新捕获的成本比样线法高1.30倍,但在精度方面是其两倍。其结果是,在5年期间发现5%趋势的概率是标记重新捕获的2.08倍。相反,考虑到6年以上的努力,使用距离采样检测趋势的最终成本要高出1.19倍。这些结果突出了选择先验抽样设计技术的重要性,包括开展试点研究,在考虑所涉及的成本的同时评估估计的偏差、精度和准确性。考虑到本文估计的种群规模较小,两种方法检测趋势的灵敏度都不够,因为当检测到下降趋势时,原始种群将显着减少。因此,即使获得了可靠的估计,仍然必须采取预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mark-recapture vs. line-transect abundance estimates of a coastal dolphin population: a case study of Tursiops truncatus from Laguna, southern Brazil
Cetacean populations in coastal habitats are increasingly threatened by multiple anthropogenic impacts. Monitoring these populations to obtain robust estimates of abundance and detect trends over time is critical to achieve conservation goals. Here, we conducted a pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness of two commonly used abundance estimation methods: mark-recapture and distance sampling line-transect. Surveys were conducted to estimate the abundance of bottlenose dolphins in Laguna, southern Brazil. We implemented power-analysis models and compared both techniques in terms of cost, time and effectiveness to detect trends over a five-year period. Mark-recapture models were analyzed in MARK and resulted in an abundance of 50 individuals (CI = 39-64) with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.13. The line-transect models were implemented using the program DISTANCE and resulted in an estimate of 62 individuals (CI = 38-103), with a CV of 0.24. Comparing both approaches, mark-recapture resulted 1.30 time more expensive than line-transect for a single season of effort, but was twice as effective in terms of precision. As a consequence, the probability of detecting a 5% trend during a five-year period is 2.08 times higher with mark recapture. Conversely, the final cost to detect a trend with distance sampling is 1.19 time higher but considering six more years of effort. These results highlight the importance of selecting a-priori sampling design techniques that include developing pilot studies that evaluate the bias, precision and accuracy of estimates while considering costs involved. Considering the small population size estimated herein, the sensitivity of both approaches for detecting trends is not sufficient because the original population would be markedly reduced by the time a declining trend was detected. Thus, a precautionary approach is still imperative, even when robust estimates are obtained.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Macroscopic and histologic characteristics of sexual maturation in the Burmeister’s porpoise Phocoena spinipinnis from Peru Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) occurrence and grazing spots in three protected areas of Costa Rica Stranding reports of the Antillean manatee in the middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia 2011 to 2023 Quantifying minimum survey effort to reliably detect Amazonian manatees using an unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) at an ex situ soft-release site Perceptions on the distribution, threats, strandings, and conservation of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) in the Río Dulce National Park, Izabal, Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1