自卑,而不是诱饵和目标的相似性,是吸引效应背后的注意力转移:来自真实选择的眼球追踪研究的证据。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.1037/NPE0000104
M. Król, M. Król
{"title":"自卑,而不是诱饵和目标的相似性,是吸引效应背后的注意力转移:来自真实选择的眼球追踪研究的证据。","authors":"M. Król, M. Król","doi":"10.1037/NPE0000104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"18 Recent studies reported that the attraction effect, whereby inferior decoys cause choice reversals, 19 fails to replicate if the choice options are presented in a pictorial rather than abstract numerical 20 form. We argue that the pictorial setting makes the similarity between decoy and target salient, 21 while the abstract one emphasizes the inferiority relationship between them, crucial for the effect 22 to occur. Thus, we used a novel experimental design in which both similarity and inferiority are 23 equally easy to judge, their relative strength simple to manipulate, and choices incentivized 24 rather than hypothetical. Using eye-tracking, we found that both the transfer of attention towards 25 an undesirable target and choice reversal likelihood increase when the decoy is more strongly 26 inferior but less similar to the target. This suggests that a key mechanism in the attraction effect 27 is that, by virtue of its inferiority, a decoy projects a spotlight of attention towards the target, 28 making it more attractive. 29","PeriodicalId":45695,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inferiority, not similarity of the decoy to target, is what drives the transfer of attention underlying the attraction effect: Evidence from an eye-tracking study with real choices.\",\"authors\":\"M. Król, M. Król\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/NPE0000104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"18 Recent studies reported that the attraction effect, whereby inferior decoys cause choice reversals, 19 fails to replicate if the choice options are presented in a pictorial rather than abstract numerical 20 form. We argue that the pictorial setting makes the similarity between decoy and target salient, 21 while the abstract one emphasizes the inferiority relationship between them, crucial for the effect 22 to occur. Thus, we used a novel experimental design in which both similarity and inferiority are 23 equally easy to judge, their relative strength simple to manipulate, and choices incentivized 24 rather than hypothetical. Using eye-tracking, we found that both the transfer of attention towards 25 an undesirable target and choice reversal likelihood increase when the decoy is more strongly 26 inferior but less similar to the target. This suggests that a key mechanism in the attraction effect 27 is that, by virtue of its inferiority, a decoy projects a spotlight of attention towards the target, 28 making it more attractive. 29\",\"PeriodicalId\":45695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/NPE0000104\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Psychology and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/NPE0000104","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

最近的研究报告称,如果选择选项以图形形式而不是抽象的数字形式呈现,吸引力效应(即劣质诱饵导致选择逆转)就无法复制。我们认为,图像设置突出了诱饵和目标之间的相似性,而抽象设置强调了它们之间的自卑关系,这对效果的发生至关重要。因此,我们采用了一种新颖的实验设计,在这种设计中,相似性和自卑性同样容易判断,它们的相对强度易于操纵,选择是受激励的,而不是假设的。通过眼动追踪,我们发现,当诱饵与目标更差但不太相似时,注意力向不希望的目标转移和选择逆转的可能性都会增加。这表明,吸引效应的一个关键机制是,凭借其劣势,诱饵将注意力的焦点投射到目标上,使其更具吸引力。29
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inferiority, not similarity of the decoy to target, is what drives the transfer of attention underlying the attraction effect: Evidence from an eye-tracking study with real choices.
18 Recent studies reported that the attraction effect, whereby inferior decoys cause choice reversals, 19 fails to replicate if the choice options are presented in a pictorial rather than abstract numerical 20 form. We argue that the pictorial setting makes the similarity between decoy and target salient, 21 while the abstract one emphasizes the inferiority relationship between them, crucial for the effect 22 to occur. Thus, we used a novel experimental design in which both similarity and inferiority are 23 equally easy to judge, their relative strength simple to manipulate, and choices incentivized 24 rather than hypothetical. Using eye-tracking, we found that both the transfer of attention towards 25 an undesirable target and choice reversal likelihood increase when the decoy is more strongly 26 inferior but less similar to the target. This suggests that a key mechanism in the attraction effect 27 is that, by virtue of its inferiority, a decoy projects a spotlight of attention towards the target, 28 making it more attractive. 29
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Self-reported and electroencephalogram responses to evaluate sponsorship congruence efficacy. Is geographical location really dead in the online world? An event-related potentials study. Motivating risky choices increases risk taking. Supplemental Material for From Genes to Performance: Dopaminergic Modulation of Decision Making in a Stock Market Simulation Supplemental Material for Motivating Risky Choices Increases Risk Taking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1