阿根廷化脓性链球菌、无乳链球菌和肺炎链球菌大环内酯类耐药趋势及其与社会聚集性的关系

G. Rubinstein, B. Bavdaz, S. Bunder, N. Blázquez
{"title":"阿根廷化脓性链球菌、无乳链球菌和肺炎链球菌大环内酯类耐药趋势及其与社会聚集性的关系","authors":"G. Rubinstein, B. Bavdaz, S. Bunder, N. Blázquez","doi":"10.2174/1876518101103010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this work was to study and compare macrolide resistance patterns among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pyogenes, to describe the phenotypes of macrolide-lincosamide resistance and to further investigate associations between macrolide resistance and social clustering. Susceptibility data were obtained from 4 clinical microbiology laboratories in Bariloche, Argentina for the period 2002- 2008. Patients were differentiated in two population clusters according to the institution they attended (public or private). A total of 4310 strains were studied: 2615 S. pyogenes, 995 S. agalactiae and 700 isolates of S.pneumoniae. Erythromycin resistance rates over the study period were 1.5% for S. pyogenes, 7.8% for S. agalactiae and 11.3% for S. pneumoniae. For the complete study group, these values differed significantly among species (contingency table  2 = 164.52, p<0.0001). Resistance in S.pyogenes and S. pneumoniae showed irregular trends whilst S. agalactiae showed an increasing tendency during the whole period appearing to be a better indicator of the trends in macrolide resistance. A dual character MLSB phenotype of both inducible and constitutive resistance was observed in S. agalactiae only. Resistance in isolates from the population attending private institutions was significantly higher than those attending the public hospital (S. pyogenes, (1.9 vs. 0.6,  2 = 5.851, p<0.025); S. pneumoniae, 19.1 vs. 7.0 ( 2 = 21.98, p<0.001), and. S. agalactiae, 12.4 vs. 3.8 ( 2 = 24.5, p<0.001)). In conclusion, macrolides resistance rates during 2002-2008 were significantly different for S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S.pneumoniae. We also found significant variations in macrolide resistance levels in different population groups.","PeriodicalId":22920,"journal":{"name":"The Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Macrolide Resistance for Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pneumoniae and its Association with Social Clustering in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"G. Rubinstein, B. Bavdaz, S. Bunder, N. Blázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1876518101103010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this work was to study and compare macrolide resistance patterns among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pyogenes, to describe the phenotypes of macrolide-lincosamide resistance and to further investigate associations between macrolide resistance and social clustering. Susceptibility data were obtained from 4 clinical microbiology laboratories in Bariloche, Argentina for the period 2002- 2008. Patients were differentiated in two population clusters according to the institution they attended (public or private). A total of 4310 strains were studied: 2615 S. pyogenes, 995 S. agalactiae and 700 isolates of S.pneumoniae. Erythromycin resistance rates over the study period were 1.5% for S. pyogenes, 7.8% for S. agalactiae and 11.3% for S. pneumoniae. For the complete study group, these values differed significantly among species (contingency table  2 = 164.52, p<0.0001). Resistance in S.pyogenes and S. pneumoniae showed irregular trends whilst S. agalactiae showed an increasing tendency during the whole period appearing to be a better indicator of the trends in macrolide resistance. A dual character MLSB phenotype of both inducible and constitutive resistance was observed in S. agalactiae only. Resistance in isolates from the population attending private institutions was significantly higher than those attending the public hospital (S. pyogenes, (1.9 vs. 0.6,  2 = 5.851, p<0.025); S. pneumoniae, 19.1 vs. 7.0 ( 2 = 21.98, p<0.001), and. S. agalactiae, 12.4 vs. 3.8 ( 2 = 24.5, p<0.001)). In conclusion, macrolides resistance rates during 2002-2008 were significantly different for S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S.pneumoniae. We also found significant variations in macrolide resistance levels in different population groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876518101103010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Antimicrobial Agents Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1876518101103010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是研究和比较肺炎链球菌、无乳链球菌和化脓链球菌对大环内酯类药物的耐药模式,描述大环内酯类药物耐药的表型,并进一步探讨大环内酯类药物耐药与社会聚类之间的关系。2002- 2008年期间,从阿根廷巴里洛切的4个临床微生物实验室获得了药敏数据。根据患者就读的机构(公立或私立)将患者分为两类人群。共检出4310株,其中化脓性链球菌2615株,无乳链球菌995株,肺炎链球菌700株。研究期间,化脓性链球菌、无乳链球菌和肺炎链球菌的红霉素耐药率分别为1.5%、7.8%和11.3%。对于整个研究组,这些值在物种之间差异显著(列联表2 = 164.52,p<0.0001)。化脓性链球菌和肺炎链球菌的耐药呈不规则趋势,而无乳链球菌在整个时期呈上升趋势,这是大环内酯类耐药趋势的较好指标。仅在无乳葡萄球菌中观察到诱导型和构成型双性状MLSB表型。私立机构人群中分离株的耐药性显著高于公立医院人群(化脓性链球菌,(1.9 vs. 0.6,2 = 5.851,p<0.025);肺炎链球菌,19.1 vs. 7.0(2 = 21.98,p<0.001);无乳链球菌,12.4比3.8(2 = 24.5,p<0.001)。结论:2002-2008年,化脓性链球菌、无乳链球菌和肺炎链球菌的大环内酯类药物耐药率存在显著差异。我们还发现大环内酯类药物耐药水平在不同人群中存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trends in Macrolide Resistance for Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pneumoniae and its Association with Social Clustering in Argentina
The aim of this work was to study and compare macrolide resistance patterns among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pyogenes, to describe the phenotypes of macrolide-lincosamide resistance and to further investigate associations between macrolide resistance and social clustering. Susceptibility data were obtained from 4 clinical microbiology laboratories in Bariloche, Argentina for the period 2002- 2008. Patients were differentiated in two population clusters according to the institution they attended (public or private). A total of 4310 strains were studied: 2615 S. pyogenes, 995 S. agalactiae and 700 isolates of S.pneumoniae. Erythromycin resistance rates over the study period were 1.5% for S. pyogenes, 7.8% for S. agalactiae and 11.3% for S. pneumoniae. For the complete study group, these values differed significantly among species (contingency table  2 = 164.52, p<0.0001). Resistance in S.pyogenes and S. pneumoniae showed irregular trends whilst S. agalactiae showed an increasing tendency during the whole period appearing to be a better indicator of the trends in macrolide resistance. A dual character MLSB phenotype of both inducible and constitutive resistance was observed in S. agalactiae only. Resistance in isolates from the population attending private institutions was significantly higher than those attending the public hospital (S. pyogenes, (1.9 vs. 0.6,  2 = 5.851, p<0.025); S. pneumoniae, 19.1 vs. 7.0 ( 2 = 21.98, p<0.001), and. S. agalactiae, 12.4 vs. 3.8 ( 2 = 24.5, p<0.001)). In conclusion, macrolides resistance rates during 2002-2008 were significantly different for S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae and S.pneumoniae. We also found significant variations in macrolide resistance levels in different population groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inhibition of Intracellular Survival of Multi Drug Resistant Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Macrophages by Curcumin Antibiotic Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections in Ambulatory Care in Belgium Antibiotic Resistance Prevalence and Pattern in Environmental Bacterial Isolates Pathogenicity for Mice of a Recombinant of Vaccinia Virus and Protection Against Infection with a Lethal Virus Amphotericin B: A New Look at Cellular Binding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1