COPD患者参加正念干预项目的障碍和促进因素。系统的定性评价

M. Clari, Roberto Fontanella, D. Ivziku, V. Dimonte, M. Matarese
{"title":"COPD患者参加正念干预项目的障碍和促进因素。系统的定性评价","authors":"M. Clari, Roberto Fontanella, D. Ivziku, V. Dimonte, M. Matarese","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: A growing number of qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted applying mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) to treat psychological and physical manifestations in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Evidence on their effectiveness is still conflicting. Understanding the experiences of people affected by COPD attending the MBI program could help to design interventions suitable to these population and improve their effectiveness. Aim: A qualitative systematic review was conducted aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators at the participation of MBI programs from the perspective of people with COPD. Methods: Systematic research on relevant databases was conducted including COPD individuals at any disease stage and any MBI program. Qualitative study designs were included. A meta-aggregative approach was used following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach. Results: Three qualitative and two mixed methods studies were identified and included. The participation at mindfulness-based programs was hampered by psychological barriers, such as disbelief and lack of trust, and practical barriers, such as difficulties in attending the classes. Also, cultural barriers hinder trusting the programs Having shorter sessions, distance session via skype and compassionate coaches could promote the retention and the adherence at the mindfulness practice. The absence of group physical presence could deter individuals to continuing the programs. Conclusion: Specific MBI programs considering COPD patients’ preferences should be tested to optimise the retention and adherence and to maximise their effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":76252,"journal":{"name":"Nurses Lamp","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators at attending mindfulness-based intervention programs of people with COPD. A systematic qualitative review\",\"authors\":\"M. Clari, Roberto Fontanella, D. Ivziku, V. Dimonte, M. Matarese\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: A growing number of qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted applying mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) to treat psychological and physical manifestations in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Evidence on their effectiveness is still conflicting. Understanding the experiences of people affected by COPD attending the MBI program could help to design interventions suitable to these population and improve their effectiveness. Aim: A qualitative systematic review was conducted aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators at the participation of MBI programs from the perspective of people with COPD. Methods: Systematic research on relevant databases was conducted including COPD individuals at any disease stage and any MBI program. Qualitative study designs were included. A meta-aggregative approach was used following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach. Results: Three qualitative and two mixed methods studies were identified and included. The participation at mindfulness-based programs was hampered by psychological barriers, such as disbelief and lack of trust, and practical barriers, such as difficulties in attending the classes. Also, cultural barriers hinder trusting the programs Having shorter sessions, distance session via skype and compassionate coaches could promote the retention and the adherence at the mindfulness practice. The absence of group physical presence could deter individuals to continuing the programs. Conclusion: Specific MBI programs considering COPD patients’ preferences should be tested to optimise the retention and adherence and to maximise their effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurses Lamp\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurses Lamp","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的定性和定量研究已经应用正念干预(mbi)来治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的心理和身体表现。关于其有效性的证据仍然相互矛盾。了解COPD患者参加MBI项目的经历可以帮助设计适合这些人群的干预措施并提高其有效性。目的:进行一项定性系统评价,旨在从COPD患者的角度探讨参与MBI计划的障碍和促进因素。方法:对COPD患者各疾病阶段、各MBI方案的相关数据库进行系统研究。包括定性研究设计。根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的方法,采用了元聚合方法。结果:确定并纳入了三个定性研究和两个混合方法研究。参与以正念为基础的课程受到心理障碍的阻碍,例如不信任和缺乏信任,以及实际障碍,例如上课困难。此外,文化障碍也阻碍了对项目的信任。较短的课程、通过skype进行的远程课程和富有同情心的教练可以促进正念练习的保留和坚持。缺乏集体的实际存在可能会阻止个人继续这些计划。结论:考虑到COPD患者的偏好,应该测试特定的MBI方案,以优化保留和依从性,并最大化其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and facilitators at attending mindfulness-based intervention programs of people with COPD. A systematic qualitative review
Introduction: A growing number of qualitative and quantitative studies have been conducted applying mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) to treat psychological and physical manifestations in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Evidence on their effectiveness is still conflicting. Understanding the experiences of people affected by COPD attending the MBI program could help to design interventions suitable to these population and improve their effectiveness. Aim: A qualitative systematic review was conducted aimed at exploring the barriers and facilitators at the participation of MBI programs from the perspective of people with COPD. Methods: Systematic research on relevant databases was conducted including COPD individuals at any disease stage and any MBI program. Qualitative study designs were included. A meta-aggregative approach was used following the Joanna Briggs Institute approach. Results: Three qualitative and two mixed methods studies were identified and included. The participation at mindfulness-based programs was hampered by psychological barriers, such as disbelief and lack of trust, and practical barriers, such as difficulties in attending the classes. Also, cultural barriers hinder trusting the programs Having shorter sessions, distance session via skype and compassionate coaches could promote the retention and the adherence at the mindfulness practice. The absence of group physical presence could deter individuals to continuing the programs. Conclusion: Specific MBI programs considering COPD patients’ preferences should be tested to optimise the retention and adherence and to maximise their effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rethinking COPD Exacerbations: a global patient perspective Is an informative application a suitable tool for patients in a diagnostic lung cancer program?A qualitative study Use of Clinical Nurse Specialists in the Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Health-psychologic features and health-related quality of life in persons with severe asthma The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Portuguese rehabilitation nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1