环境资源评价与补偿中的问题分析

Gan Hui , Wu Qiaoya , Ye Wenhu
{"title":"环境资源评价与补偿中的问题分析","authors":"Gan Hui ,&nbsp;Wu Qiaoya ,&nbsp;Ye Wenhu","doi":"10.1016/S1872-583X(09)60020-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The process of evaluation and compensation for environment or resources is a complex research field involving environment science, sociology, and economics. This essay mainly discusses the process from the sociological view and proposes the related paradigm. The possible problems during the process were pointed out: acceptor/donor may make an immoderate price by taking the advantage of the specialty of the environment/resources, using information asymmetry, or colluding with middleman; may cause behavioral transformation; may lead to unexpected results when the policy was not effectively making and evaluating; may result in insufficient supply of products with positive externalities being lack of enough physical or symbolic inspiration. The following methods might be helpful to improve the situation: establishing an effective supervising system, encouraging the development of cross-bencher evaluating organizations, encouraging the development of Non-Governmental Organizations, encouraging the public participation, and setting up the effective market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100240,"journal":{"name":"China Population, Resources and Environment","volume":"18 5","pages":"Pages 144-147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1872-583X(09)60020-6","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis on Problems during Evaluating and Compensating of Environment/Resources\",\"authors\":\"Gan Hui ,&nbsp;Wu Qiaoya ,&nbsp;Ye Wenhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1872-583X(09)60020-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The process of evaluation and compensation for environment or resources is a complex research field involving environment science, sociology, and economics. This essay mainly discusses the process from the sociological view and proposes the related paradigm. The possible problems during the process were pointed out: acceptor/donor may make an immoderate price by taking the advantage of the specialty of the environment/resources, using information asymmetry, or colluding with middleman; may cause behavioral transformation; may lead to unexpected results when the policy was not effectively making and evaluating; may result in insufficient supply of products with positive externalities being lack of enough physical or symbolic inspiration. The following methods might be helpful to improve the situation: establishing an effective supervising system, encouraging the development of cross-bencher evaluating organizations, encouraging the development of Non-Governmental Organizations, encouraging the public participation, and setting up the effective market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Population, Resources and Environment\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 144-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1872-583X(09)60020-6\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Population, Resources and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872583X09600206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Population, Resources and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872583X09600206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

环境或资源的评价与补偿过程是一个涉及环境科学、社会学和经济学的复杂研究领域。本文主要从社会学的角度探讨了这一过程,并提出了相关的范式。指出了在这一过程中可能存在的问题:利用环境/资源的特殊性、利用信息不对称、与中间商勾结等方式,可能导致接受者/捐赠者价格过高;可能导致行为转变;在政策制定和评估不到位的情况下,可能导致意想不到的结果;可能导致具有正外部性的产品供应不足,即缺乏足够的物理或符号灵感。建立有效的监督体系、鼓励跨席评估机构的发展、鼓励非政府组织的发展、鼓励公众参与、建立有效的市场等方法可能有助于改善这种状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis on Problems during Evaluating and Compensating of Environment/Resources

The process of evaluation and compensation for environment or resources is a complex research field involving environment science, sociology, and economics. This essay mainly discusses the process from the sociological view and proposes the related paradigm. The possible problems during the process were pointed out: acceptor/donor may make an immoderate price by taking the advantage of the specialty of the environment/resources, using information asymmetry, or colluding with middleman; may cause behavioral transformation; may lead to unexpected results when the policy was not effectively making and evaluating; may result in insufficient supply of products with positive externalities being lack of enough physical or symbolic inspiration. The following methods might be helpful to improve the situation: establishing an effective supervising system, encouraging the development of cross-bencher evaluating organizations, encouraging the development of Non-Governmental Organizations, encouraging the public participation, and setting up the effective market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empirical Study on China’s Agricultural Productivity under the Binding of Environment Public Preferences for Shanghai Riparian Zone and Evaluation of Its Ecosystem Service Value An Empirical Study on Determinants of Sustainable Development of Coastal Eco-tourism Rural Labor Transfer Mode and Regional Nonequilibrium Degree Comparative Study in Shandong and Henan Provinces Chinese Agricultural Policies in Thirty Years and Analysis on the Effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1