在实验环境中给药恩诺沙星后猪粪大肠杆菌的抗菌敏感性

IF 0.5 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2376/0005-9366-17079
E. Burow, M. Grobbel, B. Tenhagen, C. Simoneit, M. Ladwig, I. Szabó, D. Wendt, S. Banneke, A. Kaesbohrer
{"title":"在实验环境中给药恩诺沙星后猪粪大肠杆菌的抗菌敏感性","authors":"E. Burow, M. Grobbel, B. Tenhagen, C. Simoneit, M. Ladwig, I. Szabó, D. Wendt, S. Banneke, A. Kaesbohrer","doi":"10.2376/0005-9366-17079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study objective was to evaluate the effect of oral (OT) and parenteral (PT) administration of enrofloxacin to weaners on untreated contact animals. We assessed a) fluoroquinolone occurrence in the blood serum of untreated contact animals (COT, CPT); b) resistance to (fluoro)quinolones in commensal Escherichia coli (E. coli) in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the control (CON), and c) resistance to other antimicrobials in E. coli in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the initial situation before the treatment in these groups. Five groups of 14 weaners each were housed in three separate rooms (OT with COT, PT with CPT, CON alone). OT and PT were treated with enrofloxacin for five days. Rectal swabs and blood samples were taken before, during and until 51 days after treatment. Enro- and ciprofloxacin were detected in all treated, all COT and half of the CPT pigs. Neither through selective isolation nor by susceptibility testing of one random non-selectively isolated faecal E. coli per sample, resistance to ciprofloxacin (metabolite of enrofloxacin) and nalidixic acid was detected in both treatment and contact groups during and short after treatment. However, a transient increase of E. coli resistant to antimicrobials other than quinolones followed the treatment in isolates from OT and COT (e.g. ampicillin p < 0.05). In conclusion, animals in contact with treated animals are exposed to and can intake antimicrobials. Animals in contact with orally treated animals show occurrence of antibiotic resistant E. coli. Further studies are needed to show whether these preliminary findings can be confirmed under different conditions and with more sensitive detection methods.","PeriodicalId":8761,"journal":{"name":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antimicrobial susceptibility in faecal Escherichia coli from pigs after enrofloxacin administration in an experimental environment\",\"authors\":\"E. Burow, M. Grobbel, B. Tenhagen, C. Simoneit, M. Ladwig, I. Szabó, D. Wendt, S. Banneke, A. Kaesbohrer\",\"doi\":\"10.2376/0005-9366-17079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study objective was to evaluate the effect of oral (OT) and parenteral (PT) administration of enrofloxacin to weaners on untreated contact animals. We assessed a) fluoroquinolone occurrence in the blood serum of untreated contact animals (COT, CPT); b) resistance to (fluoro)quinolones in commensal Escherichia coli (E. coli) in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the control (CON), and c) resistance to other antimicrobials in E. coli in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the initial situation before the treatment in these groups. Five groups of 14 weaners each were housed in three separate rooms (OT with COT, PT with CPT, CON alone). OT and PT were treated with enrofloxacin for five days. Rectal swabs and blood samples were taken before, during and until 51 days after treatment. Enro- and ciprofloxacin were detected in all treated, all COT and half of the CPT pigs. Neither through selective isolation nor by susceptibility testing of one random non-selectively isolated faecal E. coli per sample, resistance to ciprofloxacin (metabolite of enrofloxacin) and nalidixic acid was detected in both treatment and contact groups during and short after treatment. However, a transient increase of E. coli resistant to antimicrobials other than quinolones followed the treatment in isolates from OT and COT (e.g. ampicillin p < 0.05). In conclusion, animals in contact with treated animals are exposed to and can intake antimicrobials. Animals in contact with orally treated animals show occurrence of antibiotic resistant E. coli. Further studies are needed to show whether these preliminary findings can be confirmed under different conditions and with more sensitive detection methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-17079\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-17079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

研究目的是评估口服(OT)和肠外(PT)给药恩诺沙星对未治疗的接触动物的影响。我们评估了a)未经治疗的接触动物(COT、CPT)血清中氟喹诺酮类药物的含量;b)与对照组(CON)相比,OT、PT、COT和CPT组的共生大肠杆菌(E. coli)对(氟)喹诺酮类药物的耐药性,以及c)与这些组治疗前的初始情况相比,OT、PT、COT和CPT组的大肠杆菌对其他抗菌素的耐药性。五组每组14名断奶仔猪被安置在三个独立的房间(OT加COT, PT加CPT,单独CON)。OT和PT均用恩诺沙星治疗5天。在治疗前、治疗期间和治疗后51天,均取直肠拭子和血液样本。所有治疗猪、所有COT猪和半数CPT猪均检测到Enro和环丙沙星。无论是通过选择性分离,还是对每个样本随机进行一次非选择性分离的粪便大肠杆菌的药敏试验,均未在治疗组和接触组中检测到对环丙沙星(恩诺沙星的代谢物)和萘啶酸的耐药性。然而,在OT和COT分离株治疗后,对喹诺酮类药物以外的抗菌素耐药的大肠杆菌短暂增加(例如氨苄西林p < 0.05)。总之,与治疗过的动物接触的动物会暴露并摄入抗菌素。与口服治疗过的动物接触的动物出现耐抗生素大肠杆菌。需要进一步的研究来证明这些初步发现是否可以在不同的条件下和更灵敏的检测方法下得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antimicrobial susceptibility in faecal Escherichia coli from pigs after enrofloxacin administration in an experimental environment
The study objective was to evaluate the effect of oral (OT) and parenteral (PT) administration of enrofloxacin to weaners on untreated contact animals. We assessed a) fluoroquinolone occurrence in the blood serum of untreated contact animals (COT, CPT); b) resistance to (fluoro)quinolones in commensal Escherichia coli (E. coli) in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the control (CON), and c) resistance to other antimicrobials in E. coli in OT, PT, COT and CPT compared to the initial situation before the treatment in these groups. Five groups of 14 weaners each were housed in three separate rooms (OT with COT, PT with CPT, CON alone). OT and PT were treated with enrofloxacin for five days. Rectal swabs and blood samples were taken before, during and until 51 days after treatment. Enro- and ciprofloxacin were detected in all treated, all COT and half of the CPT pigs. Neither through selective isolation nor by susceptibility testing of one random non-selectively isolated faecal E. coli per sample, resistance to ciprofloxacin (metabolite of enrofloxacin) and nalidixic acid was detected in both treatment and contact groups during and short after treatment. However, a transient increase of E. coli resistant to antimicrobials other than quinolones followed the treatment in isolates from OT and COT (e.g. ampicillin p < 0.05). In conclusion, animals in contact with treated animals are exposed to and can intake antimicrobials. Animals in contact with orally treated animals show occurrence of antibiotic resistant E. coli. Further studies are needed to show whether these preliminary findings can be confirmed under different conditions and with more sensitive detection methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of veterinary public health and its related subjects, such as epidemiology, bacteriology, virology, pathology, immunology, parasitology, and mycology. The journal publishes original research papers, review articles, case studies and short communications on farm animals, companion animals, equines, wild animals and laboratory animals. In addition, the editors regularly commission special issues on topics of major importance. The journal’s articles are published either in German or English and always include an abstract in the other language.
期刊最新文献
Analyse der Auswirkung unterschiedlicher ökologischer Milchviehhaltungssysteme in Bayern auf standardisiert erhobene Werte zu Milchleistung, Fortpflanzungsgeschehen und Stoffwechselgesundheit Coronaviruses in Bats Erfassung und Auswertung von Tierwohl­indikatoren im Rahmen der amtlichen Schlachttieruntersuchung bei Schlachtschweinen zur Optimierung der Tier­gesundheit im Herkunftsbetrieb und zur Anwendung als „Frühwarnsystem“ bei der Fleischuntersuchung Vaccines against Coronaviruses of Veterinary Importance Infrastructure of animal farms: key constructional elements in terms of biosecurity based on experience from Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1