供应链协作与供应链金融采用:信息透明度和交易依赖的调节作用

Lixu Li, Zhiqiang Wang, Lujie Chen, Xiande Zhao, Shui-Hua Yang
{"title":"供应链协作与供应链金融采用:信息透明度和交易依赖的调节作用","authors":"Lixu Li, Zhiqiang Wang, Lujie Chen, Xiande Zhao, Shui-Hua Yang","doi":"10.1108/scm-04-2022-0169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAlthough supply chain collaboration (SCC) theoretically boosts the adoption of supply chain finance (SCF) through information sharing and cost savings, many companies with good supply chain partnerships still hesitate to engage in SCF. To disentangle this puzzle, this study aims to explore how two dimensions of information transparency (i.e. information quantity and information quality) and two types of transaction dependence (i.e. dependence on suppliers and dependence on customers) influence the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study uses secondary survey data from a Chinese bank, including 464 Chinese companies that have adopted SCF to varying degrees. This study then performs the logistic regression analysis to test the hypotheses.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study empirically confirms that SCC shows a positive relationship with SCF adoption. More interestingly, information quantity negatively moderates this positive relationship, whereas information quality positively moderates this positive relationship. Most surprisingly, dependence on customers rather than dependence on suppliers strengthens this positive relationship.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study makes theoretical contributions to the SCF literature by demonstrating the distinct moderating mechanisms regarding the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption. The findings also help companies reexamine their interactions with supply chain members.\n","PeriodicalId":43857,"journal":{"name":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supply chain collaboration and supply chain finance adoption: the moderating role of information transparency and transaction dependence\",\"authors\":\"Lixu Li, Zhiqiang Wang, Lujie Chen, Xiande Zhao, Shui-Hua Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/scm-04-2022-0169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nAlthough supply chain collaboration (SCC) theoretically boosts the adoption of supply chain finance (SCF) through information sharing and cost savings, many companies with good supply chain partnerships still hesitate to engage in SCF. To disentangle this puzzle, this study aims to explore how two dimensions of information transparency (i.e. information quantity and information quality) and two types of transaction dependence (i.e. dependence on suppliers and dependence on customers) influence the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study uses secondary survey data from a Chinese bank, including 464 Chinese companies that have adopted SCF to varying degrees. This study then performs the logistic regression analysis to test the hypotheses.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study empirically confirms that SCC shows a positive relationship with SCF adoption. More interestingly, information quantity negatively moderates this positive relationship, whereas information quality positively moderates this positive relationship. Most surprisingly, dependence on customers rather than dependence on suppliers strengthens this positive relationship.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study makes theoretical contributions to the SCF literature by demonstrating the distinct moderating mechanisms regarding the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption. The findings also help companies reexamine their interactions with supply chain members.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-04-2022-0169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations and Supply Chain Management-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/scm-04-2022-0169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然供应链协作(supply chain collaboration, SCC)在理论上通过信息共享和成本节约促进了供应链金融(supply chain finance, SCF)的采用,但许多拥有良好供应链合作伙伴关系的公司仍对参与供应链协作犹豫不决。为了解开这个谜团,本研究旨在探讨信息透明度的两个维度(即信息数量和信息质量)和两种类型的交易依赖(即对供应商的依赖和对客户的依赖)如何影响供应链控制和供应链控制采用之间的关系。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了一家中国银行的二次调查数据,包括464家不同程度采用SCF的中国公司。本研究然后进行逻辑回归分析,以检验假设。本研究实证证实了SCC与SCF采用呈正相关关系。更有趣的是,信息量负向调节这种正相关关系,而信息质量正向调节这种正相关关系。最令人惊讶的是,对顾客的依赖而不是对供应商的依赖加强了这种积极的关系。原创性/价值本研究通过展示独特的自定义行为与自定义行为采用之间关系的调节机制,为自定义行为文献做出了理论贡献。这些发现还有助于企业重新审视它们与供应链成员的互动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supply chain collaboration and supply chain finance adoption: the moderating role of information transparency and transaction dependence
Purpose Although supply chain collaboration (SCC) theoretically boosts the adoption of supply chain finance (SCF) through information sharing and cost savings, many companies with good supply chain partnerships still hesitate to engage in SCF. To disentangle this puzzle, this study aims to explore how two dimensions of information transparency (i.e. information quantity and information quality) and two types of transaction dependence (i.e. dependence on suppliers and dependence on customers) influence the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption. Design/methodology/approach This study uses secondary survey data from a Chinese bank, including 464 Chinese companies that have adopted SCF to varying degrees. This study then performs the logistic regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Findings This study empirically confirms that SCC shows a positive relationship with SCF adoption. More interestingly, information quantity negatively moderates this positive relationship, whereas information quality positively moderates this positive relationship. Most surprisingly, dependence on customers rather than dependence on suppliers strengthens this positive relationship. Originality/value This study makes theoretical contributions to the SCF literature by demonstrating the distinct moderating mechanisms regarding the relationship between SCC and SCF adoption. The findings also help companies reexamine their interactions with supply chain members.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
27.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
A Study of Different Croston-Like Forecasting Methods Evolution of Performance Measurement Research: An Update on Research Development from 2005 to 2020 and Future Outlook for the Field Can the supply chain management field be more critical? Building new bridges with critical management studies On the Effectiveness of Option Contracts under Supply Disruption From Wireframe to Dashboard – Creating Transparency in Supply Chain Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1