C. Burke, Manjiri M. Didolkar, H. Barnhart, E. Vinson
{"title":"使用常规非密度校准的临床计算机断层扫描数据作为识别骨质疏松症患者的潜在有用的筛查工具。","authors":"C. Burke, Manjiri M. Didolkar, H. Barnhart, E. Vinson","doi":"10.11138/CCMBM/2016.13.2.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo evaluate whether lumbar vertebral body density CT attenuation values measured in Hounsfield Units (HUs) on routine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations can be reliably measured with limited variability, and to evaluate for a correlation between HUs and bone mineral density as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan.\n\n\nMETHODS\nRetrospective review of a total of 249 routine MDCT examinations, performed to measure HUs at the first non-rib bearing lumbar vertebral body on axial images, cross-referenced to the lateral scout image.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe overall ICC and RC for intra-reader variability on CT HU were 0.987 (95% CI 0.973 - 0.999) and 15.664 (95% CI 11.66-16.97). The overall ICC and RDC for inter-reader variability on CT HU were 0.952 (95% CI 0.892 - 0.999) and 30.20 (95% CI 23.73 - 34.48). The ICC and RC for interscanner variability were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 - 0.99) and 16.67 (95% CI 13.13 - 22.85). The correlation between the L1 HUs and L1 BMD, L1 t-score, and overall t-score was 0.437, 0.392, and 0.400, respectively.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCT attenuation values of the first lumbar vertebra can be measured on routine abdomen CTs with limited variability despite multiple readers and scanners. Correlation between HU and BMD as measured by DXA scan was only weakly positive, and by this method measuring the density of a lumbar vertebral body from a routine MDCT scan does not provide the sensitivity or specificity necessary for a screening test. However above a certain measured value (180 HU), patients have a low chance of osteoporosis and therefore may not need additional screening, potentially limiting radiation exposure and cost.","PeriodicalId":47230,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism","volume":"1 1","pages":"135-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis.\",\"authors\":\"C. Burke, Manjiri M. Didolkar, H. Barnhart, E. Vinson\",\"doi\":\"10.11138/CCMBM/2016.13.2.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nTo evaluate whether lumbar vertebral body density CT attenuation values measured in Hounsfield Units (HUs) on routine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations can be reliably measured with limited variability, and to evaluate for a correlation between HUs and bone mineral density as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nRetrospective review of a total of 249 routine MDCT examinations, performed to measure HUs at the first non-rib bearing lumbar vertebral body on axial images, cross-referenced to the lateral scout image.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe overall ICC and RC for intra-reader variability on CT HU were 0.987 (95% CI 0.973 - 0.999) and 15.664 (95% CI 11.66-16.97). The overall ICC and RDC for inter-reader variability on CT HU were 0.952 (95% CI 0.892 - 0.999) and 30.20 (95% CI 23.73 - 34.48). The ICC and RC for interscanner variability were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 - 0.99) and 16.67 (95% CI 13.13 - 22.85). The correlation between the L1 HUs and L1 BMD, L1 t-score, and overall t-score was 0.437, 0.392, and 0.400, respectively.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nCT attenuation values of the first lumbar vertebra can be measured on routine abdomen CTs with limited variability despite multiple readers and scanners. Correlation between HU and BMD as measured by DXA scan was only weakly positive, and by this method measuring the density of a lumbar vertebral body from a routine MDCT scan does not provide the sensitivity or specificity necessary for a screening test. However above a certain measured value (180 HU), patients have a low chance of osteoporosis and therefore may not need additional screening, potentially limiting radiation exposure and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"135-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11138/CCMBM/2016.13.2.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11138/CCMBM/2016.13.2.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
摘要
目的评价常规计算机断层扫描(CT)检查中Hounsfield单位(HUs)测量的腰椎体密度CT衰减值是否可以在有限变异性下可靠地测量,并评估HUs与双能x线吸收仪(DXA)扫描测量的骨密度之间的相关性。方法回顾性分析249例常规MDCT检查,在轴向图像上测量第一非肋骨腰椎的HUs,交叉参考侧位侦察图像。结果CT HU阅读器内变异的总体ICC和RC分别为0.987 (95% CI 0.973 ~ 0.999)和15.664 (95% CI 11.66 ~ 16.97)。CT HU阅读器间变异的总体ICC和RDC分别为0.952 (95% CI 0.892 - 0.999)和30.20 (95% CI 23.73 - 34.48)。扫描器间变异的ICC和RC分别为0.98 (95% CI 0.95 - 0.99)和16.67 (95% CI 13.13 - 22.85)。L1 HUs与L1 BMD、L1 t-评分、总t-评分的相关系数分别为0.437、0.392、0.400。结论常规腹部ct可以测量第一腰椎的sct衰减值,尽管有多个阅读器和扫描仪,但变异性有限。通过DXA扫描测量的HU与BMD之间的相关性仅为弱阳性,并且通过这种方法从常规MDCT扫描中测量腰椎椎体密度不能提供筛查试验所需的敏感性或特异性。然而,超过某一测量值(180 HU),患者患骨质疏松的几率较低,因此可能不需要额外的筛查,从而可能限制辐射暴露和成本。
The use of routine non density calibrated clinical computed tomography data as a potentially useful screening tool for identifying patients with osteoporosis.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate whether lumbar vertebral body density CT attenuation values measured in Hounsfield Units (HUs) on routine Computed Tomography (CT) examinations can be reliably measured with limited variability, and to evaluate for a correlation between HUs and bone mineral density as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan.
METHODS
Retrospective review of a total of 249 routine MDCT examinations, performed to measure HUs at the first non-rib bearing lumbar vertebral body on axial images, cross-referenced to the lateral scout image.
RESULTS
The overall ICC and RC for intra-reader variability on CT HU were 0.987 (95% CI 0.973 - 0.999) and 15.664 (95% CI 11.66-16.97). The overall ICC and RDC for inter-reader variability on CT HU were 0.952 (95% CI 0.892 - 0.999) and 30.20 (95% CI 23.73 - 34.48). The ICC and RC for interscanner variability were 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 - 0.99) and 16.67 (95% CI 13.13 - 22.85). The correlation between the L1 HUs and L1 BMD, L1 t-score, and overall t-score was 0.437, 0.392, and 0.400, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CT attenuation values of the first lumbar vertebra can be measured on routine abdomen CTs with limited variability despite multiple readers and scanners. Correlation between HU and BMD as measured by DXA scan was only weakly positive, and by this method measuring the density of a lumbar vertebral body from a routine MDCT scan does not provide the sensitivity or specificity necessary for a screening test. However above a certain measured value (180 HU), patients have a low chance of osteoporosis and therefore may not need additional screening, potentially limiting radiation exposure and cost.
期刊介绍:
The Journal encourages the submission of case reports and clinical vignettes that provide new and exciting insights into the pathophysiology and characteristics of disorders related to skeletal function and mineral metabolism and/or highlight pratical diagnostic and /or therapeutic considerations.