用LISA标准警报器测试类星体哈勃图

L. Speri, N. Tamanini, R. Caldwell, J. Gair, Benjamin Wang
{"title":"用LISA标准警报器测试类星体哈勃图","authors":"L. Speri, N. Tamanini, R. Caldwell, J. Gair, Benjamin Wang","doi":"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Quasars have recently been used as an absolute distance indicator, extending the Hubble diagram to high redshift to reveal a deviation from the expansion history predicted for the standard, $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Here we show that the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will efficiently test this claim with standard sirens at high redshift, defined by the coincident gravitational wave (GW) and electromagnetic (EM) observations of the merger of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs). Assuming a fiducial $\\Lambda$CDM cosmology for generating mock standard siren datasets, the evidence for the $\\Lambda$CDM model with respect to an alternative model inferred from quasar data [Nat. Astron. 3, 272 (2019)] is investigated. By simulating many realizations of possible future LISA observations, we find that for $50\\%$ of these realizations (median result) 4 MBHB standard siren measurements will suffice to strongly differentiate between the two models, while 14 standard sirens will yield a similar result in $95\\%$ of the realizations. In addition, we investigate the measurement precision of cosmological parameters as a function of the number of observed LISA MBHB standard sirens, finding that 15 events will on average achieve a relative precision of $5\\%$ for $H_0$, reducing to $3\\%$ and $2\\%$ with 25 and 40 events, respectively. Our investigation clearly highlights the potential of LISA as a cosmological probe able to accurately map the expansion of the universe at $z\\gtrsim 2$, and as a tool to cross-check and cross-validate cosmological EM measurements with complementary GW observations.","PeriodicalId":8431,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the quasar Hubble diagram with LISA standard sirens\",\"authors\":\"L. Speri, N. Tamanini, R. Caldwell, J. Gair, Benjamin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Quasars have recently been used as an absolute distance indicator, extending the Hubble diagram to high redshift to reveal a deviation from the expansion history predicted for the standard, $\\\\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Here we show that the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will efficiently test this claim with standard sirens at high redshift, defined by the coincident gravitational wave (GW) and electromagnetic (EM) observations of the merger of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs). Assuming a fiducial $\\\\Lambda$CDM cosmology for generating mock standard siren datasets, the evidence for the $\\\\Lambda$CDM model with respect to an alternative model inferred from quasar data [Nat. Astron. 3, 272 (2019)] is investigated. By simulating many realizations of possible future LISA observations, we find that for $50\\\\%$ of these realizations (median result) 4 MBHB standard siren measurements will suffice to strongly differentiate between the two models, while 14 standard sirens will yield a similar result in $95\\\\%$ of the realizations. In addition, we investigate the measurement precision of cosmological parameters as a function of the number of observed LISA MBHB standard sirens, finding that 15 events will on average achieve a relative precision of $5\\\\%$ for $H_0$, reducing to $3\\\\%$ and $2\\\\%$ with 25 and 40 events, respectively. Our investigation clearly highlights the potential of LISA as a cosmological probe able to accurately map the expansion of the universe at $z\\\\gtrsim 2$, and as a tool to cross-check and cross-validate cosmological EM measurements with complementary GW observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

类星体最近被用作绝对距离指示器,将哈勃图扩展到高红移,以揭示与标准λ CDM宇宙学预测的膨胀历史的偏差。在这里,我们展示了激光干涉仪空间天线(LISA)将有效地用高红移的标准信号来测试这一说法,高红移是由大质量黑洞双星(MBHBs)合并的重合引力波(GW)和电磁(EM)观测定义的。假设一个用于生成模拟标准siren数据集的基准$\Lambda$CDM宇宙学,研究了$\Lambda$CDM模型相对于从类星体数据推断的替代模型的证据[Nat. Astron. 3,272(2019)]。通过模拟未来可能的LISA观测的许多实现,我们发现对于这些实现的50%(中位数结果),4 MBHB标准警报器测量足以强烈区分两个模型,而14个标准警报器将在95%的实现中产生类似的结果。此外,我们研究了宇宙学参数的测量精度作为观测到的LISA MBHB标准警报器数量的函数,发现15个事件对$H_0$将平均达到$ 5% $的相对精度,25个和40个事件分别降低到$ 3% $和$ 2% $。我们的研究清楚地强调了LISA作为一个宇宙探测器的潜力,能够准确地绘制宇宙在z\gtrsim 2$的膨胀,并作为一个工具,交叉检查和交叉验证宇宙电磁测量与互补的GW观测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the quasar Hubble diagram with LISA standard sirens
Quasars have recently been used as an absolute distance indicator, extending the Hubble diagram to high redshift to reveal a deviation from the expansion history predicted for the standard, $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. Here we show that the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will efficiently test this claim with standard sirens at high redshift, defined by the coincident gravitational wave (GW) and electromagnetic (EM) observations of the merger of massive black hole binaries (MBHBs). Assuming a fiducial $\Lambda$CDM cosmology for generating mock standard siren datasets, the evidence for the $\Lambda$CDM model with respect to an alternative model inferred from quasar data [Nat. Astron. 3, 272 (2019)] is investigated. By simulating many realizations of possible future LISA observations, we find that for $50\%$ of these realizations (median result) 4 MBHB standard siren measurements will suffice to strongly differentiate between the two models, while 14 standard sirens will yield a similar result in $95\%$ of the realizations. In addition, we investigate the measurement precision of cosmological parameters as a function of the number of observed LISA MBHB standard sirens, finding that 15 events will on average achieve a relative precision of $5\%$ for $H_0$, reducing to $3\%$ and $2\%$ with 25 and 40 events, respectively. Our investigation clearly highlights the potential of LISA as a cosmological probe able to accurately map the expansion of the universe at $z\gtrsim 2$, and as a tool to cross-check and cross-validate cosmological EM measurements with complementary GW observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Primordial Black Holes: from Theory to Gravitational Wave Observations Chasing the Tail of Cosmic Reionization with Dark Gap Statistics in the Ly$α$ Forest over $5 < z < 6$ Hubble tension and absolute constraints on the local Hubble parameter. Towards an Optimal Estimation of Cosmological Parameters with the Wavelet Scattering Transform Assessment of the cosmic distance duality relation using Gaussian process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1