外三叉神经刺激治疗偏头痛:目前对机制的了解。

J. Schoenen
{"title":"外三叉神经刺激治疗偏头痛:目前对机制的了解。","authors":"J. Schoenen","doi":"10.18103/IMR.V3I4.411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"s. In a pilot trial of 10 episodic migraine patients who treated 3 successive attacks with the device, total relief without rescue medication was obtained in 12% of attacks at 30 minutes, incomplete relief with rescue medication in 42.5% and no effect in 45.5% (28). In an open study of 16 patients, the Cefaly device was effective and welltolerated as rescue therapy for migraine attack symptoms present since at least 72 hours; it reduced the migraine headache on average by 46%, and 56% of patients declared they would like to use the device again (29). In another open study, Chou et al. (30) treated 30 patients during an attack in the hospital for 1 hour, which resulted on average in a 57% decrease of headache intensity. The sham-controlled trial with a similar protocol is about to be completed (see table 1). We recently published the results of an Internet survey on migraine attack treatment with the Cefaly in 463 regular users using a structured questionnaire: 88.6% of them reported using the device in 71.8% of their attacks; the use of the device allowed a reduction of acute medication intake in 42.6% of attacks (31). The precise mode of action of pericranial neurostimulation methods in migraine remains to be determined. Recent neuroimaging studies, however, may shed light on possible relevant mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":91699,"journal":{"name":"Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online)","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Migraine treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation: current knowledge on mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"J. Schoenen\",\"doi\":\"10.18103/IMR.V3I4.411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"s. In a pilot trial of 10 episodic migraine patients who treated 3 successive attacks with the device, total relief without rescue medication was obtained in 12% of attacks at 30 minutes, incomplete relief with rescue medication in 42.5% and no effect in 45.5% (28). In an open study of 16 patients, the Cefaly device was effective and welltolerated as rescue therapy for migraine attack symptoms present since at least 72 hours; it reduced the migraine headache on average by 46%, and 56% of patients declared they would like to use the device again (29). In another open study, Chou et al. (30) treated 30 patients during an attack in the hospital for 1 hour, which resulted on average in a 57% decrease of headache intensity. The sham-controlled trial with a similar protocol is about to be completed (see table 1). We recently published the results of an Internet survey on migraine attack treatment with the Cefaly in 463 regular users using a structured questionnaire: 88.6% of them reported using the device in 71.8% of their attacks; the use of the device allowed a reduction of acute medication intake in 42.6% of attacks (31). The precise mode of action of pericranial neurostimulation methods in migraine remains to be determined. Recent neuroimaging studies, however, may shed light on possible relevant mechanisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18103/IMR.V3I4.411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal medicine review (Washington, D.C. : Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18103/IMR.V3I4.411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

5.在一项针对10例发作性偏头痛患者的试点试验中,这些患者使用该装置治疗了3次连续发作,在30分钟内,12%的发作患者在没有急救药物的情况下得到完全缓解,42.5%的患者在使用急救药物时得到不完全缓解,45.5%的患者没有效果(28)。在一项16例患者的公开研究中,Cefaly装置作为偏头痛发作症状至少存在72小时的抢救治疗有效且耐受性良好;它平均减少了46%的偏头痛,56%的患者表示他们愿意再次使用该设备(29)。在另一项公开研究中,Chou等人(30)在医院治疗30例发作患者1小时,结果头痛强度平均降低57%。采用类似方案的假对照试验即将完成(见表1)。我们最近发表了一项针对偏头痛发作治疗的网络调查结果,该调查使用Cefaly对463名常规用户进行了结构化问卷调查:88.6%的人报告在71.8%的发作中使用了该设备;使用该装置可以减少42.6%的急性发作药物摄入(31)。颅周神经刺激方法在偏头痛中的确切作用模式仍有待确定。然而,最近的神经影像学研究可能会揭示可能的相关机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Migraine treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation: current knowledge on mechanisms.
s. In a pilot trial of 10 episodic migraine patients who treated 3 successive attacks with the device, total relief without rescue medication was obtained in 12% of attacks at 30 minutes, incomplete relief with rescue medication in 42.5% and no effect in 45.5% (28). In an open study of 16 patients, the Cefaly device was effective and welltolerated as rescue therapy for migraine attack symptoms present since at least 72 hours; it reduced the migraine headache on average by 46%, and 56% of patients declared they would like to use the device again (29). In another open study, Chou et al. (30) treated 30 patients during an attack in the hospital for 1 hour, which resulted on average in a 57% decrease of headache intensity. The sham-controlled trial with a similar protocol is about to be completed (see table 1). We recently published the results of an Internet survey on migraine attack treatment with the Cefaly in 463 regular users using a structured questionnaire: 88.6% of them reported using the device in 71.8% of their attacks; the use of the device allowed a reduction of acute medication intake in 42.6% of attacks (31). The precise mode of action of pericranial neurostimulation methods in migraine remains to be determined. Recent neuroimaging studies, however, may shed light on possible relevant mechanisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School-related stressors in adolescents from 21 countries: What is universal? Episodic memory recognition of the hippocampus using a deep learning method Photoelectric dye-based retinal prosthesis (OUReP) as a novel type of artificial retina Effects of technology-based mindfulness training on wellbeing and stress Etiologies of Proptosis: A review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1