原始奴隶遗赠尤利安4 .阿德萨博小输入后点滴

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q2 HISTORY Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Pub Date : 2016-12-09 DOI:10.1163/15718190-08434p01

B. Kupisch

{"title":"原始奴隶遗赠尤利安4 .阿德萨博小输入后点滴","authors":"B. Kupisch","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08434p01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principal item of the article is how to understand the meaning of the words ‘ ne a semet ipso ei [ servo ] adimatur libertas ’ as well as ‘ a semet ipso [ servus ] libertatem accipit ’, both phrases applied to a servus cum libertate heres institutus. Usual interpretations do not convince. A similar problem of understanding affects the wording ‘ sicuti legari sibi non potes t , ita nec a se adimi ’. Main question in this text: can a testator take away the freedom of a slave who is instituted as an heir by codicil? The principle of the favor libertatis implies the negative answer to this question.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Der Sklave als Zwangs-Erbe, Ulpian/Julian 4 ad Sab. (D. 28,5,6,4) : Eine Nach-Lese\",\"authors\":\"B. Kupisch\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-08434p01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principal item of the article is how to understand the meaning of the words ‘ ne a semet ipso ei [ servo ] adimatur libertas ’ as well as ‘ a semet ipso [ servus ] libertatem accipit ’, both phrases applied to a servus cum libertate heres institutus. Usual interpretations do not convince. A similar problem of understanding affects the wording ‘ sicuti legari sibi non potes t , ita nec a se adimi ’. Main question in this text: can a testator take away the freedom of a slave who is instituted as an heir by codicil? The principle of the favor libertatis implies the negative answer to this question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434p01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08434p01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要项目是如何理解“ne a semet ipso ei [servo] adimatur libertas”和“a semet ipso [servus] libertatem accipit”这两个词的含义，这两个短语都适用于一个servus和libertate heres institutus。通常的解释不能令人信服。一个类似的理解问题影响了“sicuti legari sibi non potes t, ita nec A se adimi”的措辞。本文的主要问题是:立遗嘱人能否剥夺通过遗嘱附注而成为继承人的奴隶的自由?对自由者有利的原则意味着对这个问题的否定回答。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Der Sklave als Zwangs-Erbe, Ulpian/Julian 4 ad Sab. (D. 28,5,6,4) : Eine Nach-Lese

The principal item of the article is how to understand the meaning of the words ‘ ne a semet ipso ei [ servo ] adimatur libertas ’ as well as ‘ a semet ipso [ servus ] libertatem accipit ’, both phrases applied to a servus cum libertate heres institutus. Usual interpretations do not convince. A similar problem of understanding affects the wording ‘ sicuti legari sibi non potes t , ita nec a se adimi ’. Main question in this text: can a testator take away the freedom of a slave who is instituted as an heir by codicil? The principle of the favor libertatis implies the negative answer to this question.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.