急诊住院医师动脉血气知识水平评价

I. Ertok, Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik, H. S. Kavakli, N. Doğan, F. Icme, Sinan Becel, A. Ahmedali
{"title":"急诊住院医师动脉血气知识水平评价","authors":"I. Ertok, Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik, H. S. Kavakli, N. Doğan, F. Icme, Sinan Becel, A. Ahmedali","doi":"10.5152/JAEM.2014.74830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Our purpose in this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of interpretation of basic arterial blood gas (ABG) values and ABG values related to metabolic and respiratory disease by emergency medicine residents (EMRs). We also aimed to determine their deficiencies and create a basis for training during patient care. Material and Methods: This study was carried out through a survey taken by EMRs in training/research and university hospitals located in Ankara. The levels of knowledge of EMRs on ABG evaluation were compared based on the institution, duration of residency, and training. A 14-question test about ABG knowledge was also applied to residents. Results: The study was conducted with 25 EMRs in university hospitals (UH) and 88 EMRs in training/research hospitals (TRH); a total of 113 residents participated to the survey. There was no statistical significant difference between training/research and university hospitals according to the number of correct answers given. Year of residency did not affect the number of correct answers; however, residents who had training on ABG analysis in the residency period had more correct answers. Also, in a small study group (n=17), a significant improvement of the number of correct answers was observed with a short institutional course. Conclusion: According to the results, ABG evaluation improves with personal training in the residency period independently of residency years. Based on this result, training should be given in and out of institutions, and EMRs should be encouraged to personally study ABG evaluation. (JAEM 2014; 13: 100-3)","PeriodicalId":14780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Residents' Level of Knowledge of Arterial Blood Gases\",\"authors\":\"I. Ertok, Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik, H. S. Kavakli, N. Doğan, F. Icme, Sinan Becel, A. Ahmedali\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/JAEM.2014.74830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Our purpose in this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of interpretation of basic arterial blood gas (ABG) values and ABG values related to metabolic and respiratory disease by emergency medicine residents (EMRs). We also aimed to determine their deficiencies and create a basis for training during patient care. Material and Methods: This study was carried out through a survey taken by EMRs in training/research and university hospitals located in Ankara. The levels of knowledge of EMRs on ABG evaluation were compared based on the institution, duration of residency, and training. A 14-question test about ABG knowledge was also applied to residents. Results: The study was conducted with 25 EMRs in university hospitals (UH) and 88 EMRs in training/research hospitals (TRH); a total of 113 residents participated to the survey. There was no statistical significant difference between training/research and university hospitals according to the number of correct answers given. Year of residency did not affect the number of correct answers; however, residents who had training on ABG analysis in the residency period had more correct answers. Also, in a small study group (n=17), a significant improvement of the number of correct answers was observed with a short institutional course. Conclusion: According to the results, ABG evaluation improves with personal training in the residency period independently of residency years. Based on this result, training should be given in and out of institutions, and EMRs should be encouraged to personally study ABG evaluation. (JAEM 2014; 13: 100-3)\",\"PeriodicalId\":14780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/JAEM.2014.74830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/JAEM.2014.74830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定急诊医师(EMRs)解释基础动脉血气(ABG)值和与代谢和呼吸疾病相关的ABG值的准确性和可靠性。我们还旨在确定他们的不足之处,并为患者护理期间的培训奠定基础。材料和方法:本研究是通过安卡拉培训/研究医院和大学医院的电子病历员进行的一项调查进行的。以医院、住院时间和培训为基础,比较EMRs对ABG评估的知识水平。对居民进行14题ABG知识测试。结果:研究对象为大学医院(UH)的25份电子病历和培训/研究医院(TRH)的88份电子病历;共有113名居民参与了调查。根据给出的正确答案数量,培训/研究医院与大学医院之间没有统计学上的显着差异。居住年份不影响正确答案的数量;而在住院期间接受过ABG分析培训的住院医师答对率更高。此外,在一个小的研究小组(n=17)中,通过短期的机构课程可以观察到正确答案数量的显着改善。结论:住院医师ABG评价随个人培训而提高,与住院医师年限无关。在此基础上,开展机构内外培训,鼓励EMRs亲自学习ABG评价。(JAEM 2014;13: 100 - 3)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Emergency Medicine Residents' Level of Knowledge of Arterial Blood Gases
Objective: Our purpose in this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of interpretation of basic arterial blood gas (ABG) values and ABG values related to metabolic and respiratory disease by emergency medicine residents (EMRs). We also aimed to determine their deficiencies and create a basis for training during patient care. Material and Methods: This study was carried out through a survey taken by EMRs in training/research and university hospitals located in Ankara. The levels of knowledge of EMRs on ABG evaluation were compared based on the institution, duration of residency, and training. A 14-question test about ABG knowledge was also applied to residents. Results: The study was conducted with 25 EMRs in university hospitals (UH) and 88 EMRs in training/research hospitals (TRH); a total of 113 residents participated to the survey. There was no statistical significant difference between training/research and university hospitals according to the number of correct answers given. Year of residency did not affect the number of correct answers; however, residents who had training on ABG analysis in the residency period had more correct answers. Also, in a small study group (n=17), a significant improvement of the number of correct answers was observed with a short institutional course. Conclusion: According to the results, ABG evaluation improves with personal training in the residency period independently of residency years. Based on this result, training should be given in and out of institutions, and EMRs should be encouraged to personally study ABG evaluation. (JAEM 2014; 13: 100-3)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intramuscular Hydatid Cyst: Report of an Unusual Case Fat Embolism Syndrome after Lower Extremity Fracture A Rare Case of Isolated Auricular Injury Caused by a Tree Branch During a Traffic Accident Aneurysmal Bone Cyst of Rib: A Report of a Rare Case Could Propafenone hydrochloride Cause Visual Hallucination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1