疏水粉末对片剂抗拉强度的影响

Zoe Chu
{"title":"疏水粉末对片剂抗拉强度的影响","authors":"Zoe Chu","doi":"10.5920/bjpharm.1162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zoe Chu1,2, Christopher Windows-Yule¹, Ian Gabbott², Gavin Reynolds², Rachael Shinebaum² and Andy Ingram¹1. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT2. Oral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UKEmail: zhc906@student.bham.ac.ukIntroductionA tablet consists of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), and the other components, excipients. A tablet needs to withstand coating, packing and shipping stresses whilst maintaining the dissolution time; therefore, the tensile strength is of great importance. Currently, there is a lack of understanding on why excipients improve the bulk powder properties and the bonding mechanisms of the powder during compression. This makes tablet formulation development an inefficient trial-and-error process that is required for every new API (1). Literature has shown that the surface energy of the powders contributes a significant amount towards the tablet tensile strength. Hydrophobic powders have a lower surface energy (2) and are seen to disrupt this tablet strength (3,4).Experimental Aim and MethodThe aim was to investigate the impact of the hydrophobicity of excipient powders on tabletability of microcrystalline cellulose. This was done by mixing powders of varying hydrophobicity with MCC at varying mass fractions. There was focus on a lower mass fraction (0.02-0.1 m/m) with increasing increments of 0.02 m/m of added additive as well as gaining a global picture (0.2-1 m/m) with increments of 0.2 m/m.ResultsIt was found that at low mass fractions (0.02-0.4 m/m) of additive added the hydrophobic powders disrupted the tablet strength more compared to hydrophilic powders which could be attributed to the levels of surface energy of the additive. In contrast, at higher mass fractions (0.6-0.8 m/m), the surface energy is not as important and it is hypothesised that the deformation mechanisms of the additives governs the tablet strength.1. Reynolds GK, Campbell JI, Roberts RJ. A compressibility based model for predicting the tensile strength of directly compressed pharmaceutical powder mixtures. Int J Pharm [Internet]. 2017;531(1):215–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.0752. Sunkara D, Capece M. Influence of Material Properties on the Effectiveness of Glidants Used to Improve the Flowability of Cohesive Pharmaceutical Powders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(4):1920–30. 3. Zuurman K, Maarschalk KVDV, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. 1999;179:107–15. 4. Mishra SM, Rohera BD. Mechanics of tablet formation: a comparative evaluation of percolation theory with classical concepts. Pharm Dev Technol [Internet]. 2019;24(8):954–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2019.1599913","PeriodicalId":9253,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Hydrophobic Powders on the Tensile Strength of the Tablet\",\"authors\":\"Zoe Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.5920/bjpharm.1162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Zoe Chu1,2, Christopher Windows-Yule¹, Ian Gabbott², Gavin Reynolds², Rachael Shinebaum² and Andy Ingram¹1. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT2. Oral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UKEmail: zhc906@student.bham.ac.ukIntroductionA tablet consists of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), and the other components, excipients. A tablet needs to withstand coating, packing and shipping stresses whilst maintaining the dissolution time; therefore, the tensile strength is of great importance. Currently, there is a lack of understanding on why excipients improve the bulk powder properties and the bonding mechanisms of the powder during compression. This makes tablet formulation development an inefficient trial-and-error process that is required for every new API (1). Literature has shown that the surface energy of the powders contributes a significant amount towards the tablet tensile strength. Hydrophobic powders have a lower surface energy (2) and are seen to disrupt this tablet strength (3,4).Experimental Aim and MethodThe aim was to investigate the impact of the hydrophobicity of excipient powders on tabletability of microcrystalline cellulose. This was done by mixing powders of varying hydrophobicity with MCC at varying mass fractions. There was focus on a lower mass fraction (0.02-0.1 m/m) with increasing increments of 0.02 m/m of added additive as well as gaining a global picture (0.2-1 m/m) with increments of 0.2 m/m.ResultsIt was found that at low mass fractions (0.02-0.4 m/m) of additive added the hydrophobic powders disrupted the tablet strength more compared to hydrophilic powders which could be attributed to the levels of surface energy of the additive. In contrast, at higher mass fractions (0.6-0.8 m/m), the surface energy is not as important and it is hypothesised that the deformation mechanisms of the additives governs the tablet strength.1. Reynolds GK, Campbell JI, Roberts RJ. A compressibility based model for predicting the tensile strength of directly compressed pharmaceutical powder mixtures. Int J Pharm [Internet]. 2017;531(1):215–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.0752. Sunkara D, Capece M. Influence of Material Properties on the Effectiveness of Glidants Used to Improve the Flowability of Cohesive Pharmaceutical Powders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(4):1920–30. 3. Zuurman K, Maarschalk KVDV, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. 1999;179:107–15. 4. Mishra SM, Rohera BD. Mechanics of tablet formation: a comparative evaluation of percolation theory with classical concepts. Pharm Dev Technol [Internet]. 2019;24(8):954–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2019.1599913\",\"PeriodicalId\":9253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5920/bjpharm.1162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/bjpharm.1162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Zoe Chu1、2、Christopher Windows-Yule 1、Ian Gabbott 2、Gavin Reynolds 2、Rachael Shinebaum 2和Andy Ingram 1。英国伯明翰大学化学工程学院,英国埃德巴斯顿b152tt2口服产品开发,制药技术与开发,运营,阿斯利康,麦克尔斯菲尔德,UKEmail: zhc906@student.bham.ac.ukIntroductionA片剂由活性药物成分(API),和其他成分,赋形剂组成。片剂需要承受涂层、包装和运输压力,同时保持溶解时间;因此,抗拉强度非常重要。目前,人们对辅料改善粉末散装性能的原因和粉末在压缩过程中的结合机制缺乏了解。这使得片剂配方的开发成为一个低效的试错过程,而每一个新的原料药都需要这种试错过程(1)。文献表明,粉末的表面能对片剂的抗拉强度有很大的影响。疏水粉末具有较低的表面能(2),并且被认为会破坏这种片剂强度(3,4)。实验目的与方法研究微晶纤维素辅料粉末的疏水性对其可溶性的影响。这是通过混合不同质量分数的不同疏水性粉末和MCC来完成的。当添加量增加0.02 m/m时,重点关注较低的质量分数(0.02-0.1 m/m);当添加量增加0.2 m/m时,重点关注整体图像(0.2-1 m/m)。结果在低质量分数(0.02 ~ 0.4 m/m)下,疏水粉末对片剂强度的影响大于亲水粉末,这与添加剂的表面能水平有关。相比之下,在较高的质量分数(0.6-0.8 m/m)下,表面能不那么重要,假设添加剂的变形机制决定了片剂的强度。雷诺兹GK,坎贝尔JI,罗伯茨RJ。基于可压缩性的预测直接压缩药物粉末混合物抗拉强度的模型。国际医药[互联网]。531(1): 215 - 2017; 24。可从:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.0752。Sunkara D, Capece M.材料性能对胶粘剂对药物粉末流动性的影响。aap PharmSciTech。2018; 19(4): 1920 - 30。3.Zuurman K, Maarschalk KVDV, Bolhuis GK。硬脂酸镁对不同固结性能材料制成的片剂粘结及孔隙膨胀的影响。1999; 179:107-15。4. [m],罗赫拉BD.片剂形成机制:渗流理论与经典概念的比较评价。]Pharm Dev technology [Internet]。2019; 24(8): 954 - 66。可从:https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2019.1599913获得
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Hydrophobic Powders on the Tensile Strength of the Tablet
Zoe Chu1,2, Christopher Windows-Yule¹, Ian Gabbott², Gavin Reynolds², Rachael Shinebaum² and Andy Ingram¹1. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, B15 2TT2. Oral Product Development, Pharmaceutical Technology & Development, Operations, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UKEmail: zhc906@student.bham.ac.ukIntroductionA tablet consists of the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API), and the other components, excipients. A tablet needs to withstand coating, packing and shipping stresses whilst maintaining the dissolution time; therefore, the tensile strength is of great importance. Currently, there is a lack of understanding on why excipients improve the bulk powder properties and the bonding mechanisms of the powder during compression. This makes tablet formulation development an inefficient trial-and-error process that is required for every new API (1). Literature has shown that the surface energy of the powders contributes a significant amount towards the tablet tensile strength. Hydrophobic powders have a lower surface energy (2) and are seen to disrupt this tablet strength (3,4).Experimental Aim and MethodThe aim was to investigate the impact of the hydrophobicity of excipient powders on tabletability of microcrystalline cellulose. This was done by mixing powders of varying hydrophobicity with MCC at varying mass fractions. There was focus on a lower mass fraction (0.02-0.1 m/m) with increasing increments of 0.02 m/m of added additive as well as gaining a global picture (0.2-1 m/m) with increments of 0.2 m/m.ResultsIt was found that at low mass fractions (0.02-0.4 m/m) of additive added the hydrophobic powders disrupted the tablet strength more compared to hydrophilic powders which could be attributed to the levels of surface energy of the additive. In contrast, at higher mass fractions (0.6-0.8 m/m), the surface energy is not as important and it is hypothesised that the deformation mechanisms of the additives governs the tablet strength.1. Reynolds GK, Campbell JI, Roberts RJ. A compressibility based model for predicting the tensile strength of directly compressed pharmaceutical powder mixtures. Int J Pharm [Internet]. 2017;531(1):215–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.0752. Sunkara D, Capece M. Influence of Material Properties on the Effectiveness of Glidants Used to Improve the Flowability of Cohesive Pharmaceutical Powders. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(4):1920–30. 3. Zuurman K, Maarschalk KVDV, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. 1999;179:107–15. 4. Mishra SM, Rohera BD. Mechanics of tablet formation: a comparative evaluation of percolation theory with classical concepts. Pharm Dev Technol [Internet]. 2019;24(8):954–66. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10837450.2019.1599913
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Law: A Review of Selected Pharmaceutical Patents Litigated in the UK Courts during 2022 Ensuring Pharmaceutical Product Success through Excipient QbD Efforts Solubility Enhancement for Dietheyldithiocarbamate-Zinc for Lung Cancer Treatment Impact of Critical Material Attributes of HPMC on the Release of Gliclazide from Hydrophilic Matrix Tablets Comparative Evaluation of the Disintegrant Properties of Starches from Three Cultivars of Dioscorea rotundata (Poir)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1