计算胎儿监测特别会议

J. Behar, Z. Weiner, P. Warrick
{"title":"计算胎儿监测特别会议","authors":"J. Behar, Z. Weiner, P. Warrick","doi":"10.23919/CinC49843.2019.9005927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the improvements made in perinatal medicine during the 20th century, stillbirths still occur for 1 in 160 pregnancies in the US which represents a total of 26,000 fetal deaths each year. In addition, approximately 1 in 1000 fetuses experience oxygen deprivation during labor which is severe enough to cause brain injury. It is estimated that half of these cases of birth-related injury are preventable. Incorrect cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation is leading the list of causes.Intrapartum CTG is used routinely to measure maternal uterine pressure and fetal heart rate (FHR). Antepartum CTG monitoring is used to identify fetuses at risk of intrauterine hypoxia and acidaemia. As early as 28 weeks of gestation, analysis of the FHR trace is used as a nonstress test to assess the fetal well-being. In the perinatal period, timely, appropriate intervention can avoid fetal neurological damage or death. The CTG is visually assessed by a clinician or interpreted by computer analysis. In the context of labor monitoring, the CTG is used for continuous fetal monitoring. An abnormal heart rate will lead the clinician to perform a cesarean.With the recent advances in machine learning and statistical signal analysis new algorithms for assessing fetal antepartum or intrapartum health status are being elaborated. These algorithms process signals recorded by CTG monitors or alternative monitoring techniques such as scalp electrocardiography or non-invasive fetal electrocardiography. This session discusses the history of fetal monitoring, its current challenges and the prospects opened by recent algorithmic development.","PeriodicalId":6697,"journal":{"name":"2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"69 1","pages":"Page 1-Page 4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Session on Computational Fetal Monitoring\",\"authors\":\"J. Behar, Z. Weiner, P. Warrick\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/CinC49843.2019.9005927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the improvements made in perinatal medicine during the 20th century, stillbirths still occur for 1 in 160 pregnancies in the US which represents a total of 26,000 fetal deaths each year. In addition, approximately 1 in 1000 fetuses experience oxygen deprivation during labor which is severe enough to cause brain injury. It is estimated that half of these cases of birth-related injury are preventable. Incorrect cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation is leading the list of causes.Intrapartum CTG is used routinely to measure maternal uterine pressure and fetal heart rate (FHR). Antepartum CTG monitoring is used to identify fetuses at risk of intrauterine hypoxia and acidaemia. As early as 28 weeks of gestation, analysis of the FHR trace is used as a nonstress test to assess the fetal well-being. In the perinatal period, timely, appropriate intervention can avoid fetal neurological damage or death. The CTG is visually assessed by a clinician or interpreted by computer analysis. In the context of labor monitoring, the CTG is used for continuous fetal monitoring. An abnormal heart rate will lead the clinician to perform a cesarean.With the recent advances in machine learning and statistical signal analysis new algorithms for assessing fetal antepartum or intrapartum health status are being elaborated. These algorithms process signals recorded by CTG monitors or alternative monitoring techniques such as scalp electrocardiography or non-invasive fetal electrocardiography. This session discusses the history of fetal monitoring, its current challenges and the prospects opened by recent algorithmic development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"Page 1-Page 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/CinC49843.2019.9005927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/CinC49843.2019.9005927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管围产期医学在20世纪取得了进步,但在美国,每160例妊娠中仍有1例死产,这意味着每年总共有26,000例胎儿死亡。此外,大约千分之一的胎儿在分娩过程中缺氧,严重到足以造成脑损伤。据估计,这些与出生有关的伤害病例中有一半是可以预防的。不正确的心脏造影(CTG)解释是主要的原因。产时CTG常规用于测量母体子宫压和胎儿心率(FHR)。产前CTG监测用于识别有宫内缺氧和酸血症风险的胎儿。早在妊娠28周,分析FHR痕迹被用作评估胎儿健康的非应激测试。围产期及时、适当的干预可避免胎儿神经损伤或死亡。CTG由临床医生进行视觉评估或通过计算机分析进行解释。在产程监测中,CTG用于胎儿的连续监测。心率异常会导致临床医生进行剖宫产手术。随着机器学习和统计信号分析的最新进展,用于评估胎儿产前或分娩时健康状况的新算法正在被阐述。这些算法处理CTG监测器或替代监测技术(如头皮心电图或无创胎儿心电图)记录的信号。本课程将讨论胎儿监测的历史、当前的挑战以及最近算法发展所带来的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Special Session on Computational Fetal Monitoring
Despite the improvements made in perinatal medicine during the 20th century, stillbirths still occur for 1 in 160 pregnancies in the US which represents a total of 26,000 fetal deaths each year. In addition, approximately 1 in 1000 fetuses experience oxygen deprivation during labor which is severe enough to cause brain injury. It is estimated that half of these cases of birth-related injury are preventable. Incorrect cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation is leading the list of causes.Intrapartum CTG is used routinely to measure maternal uterine pressure and fetal heart rate (FHR). Antepartum CTG monitoring is used to identify fetuses at risk of intrauterine hypoxia and acidaemia. As early as 28 weeks of gestation, analysis of the FHR trace is used as a nonstress test to assess the fetal well-being. In the perinatal period, timely, appropriate intervention can avoid fetal neurological damage or death. The CTG is visually assessed by a clinician or interpreted by computer analysis. In the context of labor monitoring, the CTG is used for continuous fetal monitoring. An abnormal heart rate will lead the clinician to perform a cesarean.With the recent advances in machine learning and statistical signal analysis new algorithms for assessing fetal antepartum or intrapartum health status are being elaborated. These algorithms process signals recorded by CTG monitors or alternative monitoring techniques such as scalp electrocardiography or non-invasive fetal electrocardiography. This session discusses the history of fetal monitoring, its current challenges and the prospects opened by recent algorithmic development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Automated Approach Based on a Convolutional Neural Network for Left Atrium Segmentation From Late Gadolinium Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Localization of Ectopic Beats by Single Dipole: Case Study Sepsis Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Using Ensemble of XGboost Models A Comparative Analysis of HMM and CRF for Early Prediction of Sepsis Blocking L-Type Calcium Current Reduces Vulnerability to Re-Entry in Human iPSC-Derived Cardiomyocytes Tissue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1