欧盟根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49)对抗虫和抗除草剂转基因玉米Bt11 x GA21的食品/饲料和环境风险评估

A. Andreassen, P. Brandtzaeg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg
{"title":"欧盟根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49)对抗虫和抗除草剂转基因玉米Bt11 x GA21的食品/饲料和环境风险评估","authors":"A. Andreassen, P. Brandtzaeg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility.  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary. \n The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 (Unique Identifier  SYN-BTØ11-1 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds  is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since  28 July 2010 (Commission Decision 2010/4263/EC). Genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority  and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49  in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, Bt11 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2007, 2008, 2009b,c,d, 2010, 2012a,b). \n The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize Bt11x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.   \n The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated Bt11 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c).  \n The scientific risk assessment of maize Bt11x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes. \n It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.  \n The genetically modified maize stack Bt11 x GA21 has been produced by conventional crossing between inbred lines of maize containing the single events Bt11 and GA21. The F1 hybrid was developed to provide protection against certain lepidopteran target pests, and to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium and glyphosate-based herbicides.  \n Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines Bt11 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize Bt11 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental maize lines. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. Phenotypic analyses also indicate stability of the insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits in the stacked maize. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize Bt11 x GA21 and its parental events Bt11 and GA21 as adequate.  \n Comparative Assessment:mComparative analyses of data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in North America during the 2005 growing season indicate that maize stack Bt11 x GA21 is compositionally, agronomically and phenotypically equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the expression of Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins. \n Based on the assessment of available data, the VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that conventional crossing of maize Bt11 and GA21 to produce the hybrid Bt11 x GA21 does not result in interactions between the newly expressed proteins affecting composition and agronomic characteristics.   \n Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse health effects of maize Bt11 x GA21, and shows that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known        toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions. \n Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \n Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49 includes import and processing of maize stack Bt11x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize Bt11 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize Bt11 x GA21.  \n Maize Bt11 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize Bt11 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM. \n Maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue. \n Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \nThe VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food/Feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-Resistant and Herbicide-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize Bt11 x GA21 in the European Union under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49)\",\"authors\":\"A. Andreassen, P. Brandtzaeg, M. Finne, A. Holck, O. Junttila, Heidi Sjursen Konestabo, R. Meadow, A. Mikalsen, K. Nielsen, M. Sanden, V. Sipinen, R. Vikse, H. Opsahl-Sorteberg\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility.  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary. \\n The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 (Unique Identifier  SYN-BTØ11-1 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds  is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since  28 July 2010 (Commission Decision 2010/4263/EC). Genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority  and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49  in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, Bt11 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2007, 2008, 2009b,c,d, 2010, 2012a,b). \\n The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize Bt11x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.   \\n The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated Bt11 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c).  \\n The scientific risk assessment of maize Bt11x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes. \\n It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.  \\n The genetically modified maize stack Bt11 x GA21 has been produced by conventional crossing between inbred lines of maize containing the single events Bt11 and GA21. The F1 hybrid was developed to provide protection against certain lepidopteran target pests, and to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium and glyphosate-based herbicides.  \\n Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines Bt11 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize Bt11 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental maize lines. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. Phenotypic analyses also indicate stability of the insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits in the stacked maize. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize Bt11 x GA21 and its parental events Bt11 and GA21 as adequate.  \\n Comparative Assessment:mComparative analyses of data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in North America during the 2005 growing season indicate that maize stack Bt11 x GA21 is compositionally, agronomically and phenotypically equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the expression of Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins. \\n Based on the assessment of available data, the VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that conventional crossing of maize Bt11 and GA21 to produce the hybrid Bt11 x GA21 does not result in interactions between the newly expressed proteins affecting composition and agronomic characteristics.   \\n Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse health effects of maize Bt11 x GA21, and shows that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known        toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions. \\n Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \\n Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49 includes import and processing of maize stack Bt11x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize Bt11 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize Bt11 x GA21.  \\n Maize Bt11 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize Bt11 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM. \\n Maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue. \\n Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. \\nThe VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2020/v12i330207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了准备在法律上实施欧盟第1829/2003号法规,挪威环境署(原挪威自然管理局)要求挪威食品安全局(NFSA)就欧盟根据2001/18/EC号指令或第1829/2003/EC号法规授权的所有转基因生物(GMOs)和含有或由转基因生物组成的产品给出最终意见。因此,挪威食品安全局于2013年2月13日致函(ref. 2012/150202),要求挪威食品安全科学委员会(VKM)对欧盟授权的39种转基因生物和含有或由转基因生物组成的产品进行科学风险评估。该请求涵盖了与《基因技术法案》相关的范围。该请求不包括VKM已经进行了最终风险评估的转基因生物。但是,原子能机构请VKM考虑是否有必要对先前提交的评估进行更新或其他修改。先正达种子公司的抗虫耐除草剂转基因玉米Bt11 x GA21(唯一标识符SYN-BTØ11-1 x MON-ØØØ21-9)根据法规(EC) No 1829/2003批准,自2010年7月28日起用于食品和饲料用途、进口和加工(委员会决定2010/4263/EC)。转基因玉米Bt11 x GA21此前已由挪威食品安全局和挪威环境署委托的VKM转基因生物小组(GMO)进行了风险评估,该小组与2008年EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49申请的公开听证会有关(VKM 2009a)。此外,Bt11和GA21已被VKM转基因生物小组评估为单一事件和多个堆叠转基因玉米事件的组成部分(VKM 2005a,b, 2007, 2008, 2009b,c,d, 2010, 2012a,b)。玉米Bt11x GA21的食品/饲料和环境风险评估是基于申请人在申请EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49中提供的信息,以及欧洲食品安全局和其他成员国在欧洲食品安全局网站GMO Extranet上提供的科学评论。风险评估还考虑了其他同行评审的相关科学文献。VKM转基因生物专家组参照Bt11 x GA21在欧洲经济区(EEA)的预期用途,根据挪威食品法案、挪威基因技术法案、基因技术法案、关于转基因生物故意释放到环境中的指令2001/18/EC、转基因食品和饲料法规(EC) No 1829/2003所述原则,对Bt11 x GA21进行了评估。挪威食品安全科学委员会还决定考虑欧洲食品安全局转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料风险评估指南(EFSA 2011a)、转基因植物环境风险评估指南(EFSA 2010)、转基因植物风险评估比较指标的选择(EFSA 2011b)和转基因植物上市后环境监测指南(EFSA 2011c)中所述的适当原则。玉米Bt11x GA21的科学风险评估包括插入DNA的分子特征和新蛋白质的表达,农艺和表型特征的比较评估,营养评估,毒理学和过敏原性,对植物适应性的意外影响,基因转移的潜力,转基因植物与靶生物和非靶生物之间的相互作用以及对生物地球化学过程的影响。需要强调的是,根据挪威基因技术法案和与基因技术法案相关的影响评估法规,VKM任务不包括对可持续发展、社会效用和伦理考虑的贡献评估。因此,这些考虑因素不属于VKM转基因生物小组提供的风险评估的一部分。利用含有单事件Bt11和GA21的玉米自交系进行常规杂交,获得了转基因玉米组合Bt11 × GA21。开发F1杂交品种是为了提供对某些鳞翅目目标害虫的保护,并赋予对草铵膦和草甘膦除草剂的耐受性。分子表征:Southern blot和PCR分析表明,亲本玉米系Bt11和GA21中的重组插入物在玉米Bt11 × GA21堆叠中被保留。插入物的遗传稳定性先前已在亲本玉米系中得到证实。蛋白质测量显示,堆叠玉米系和单株玉米系之间的Cry1Ab、PAT和mEPSPS蛋白水平相当。表型分析也表明堆叠玉米的抗虫和耐除草剂性状具有稳定性。 转基因生物专家组认为玉米Bt11 x GA21及其亲本事件Bt11和GA21的分子特征是充分的。比较评估:2005年生长季在北美代表性地点和环境进行的田间试验数据的比较分析表明,除了Cry1Ab、PAT和mEPSPS蛋白的表达所带来的抗虫性和除草剂耐受性外,玉米秸秆Bt11 x GA21在组成、农艺和表型上与传统玉米秸秆相当。基于对现有数据的评估,VKM转基因专家组认为,通过玉米Bt11和GA21的传统杂交产生的Bt11 x GA21不会导致新表达的蛋白质之间的相互作用,从而影响其组成和农艺性状。食品和饲料风险评估:一项对肉鸡的全食物喂养研究未表明玉米Bt11 × GA21对健康有任何不良影响,并表明玉米Bt11 × GA21在营养上与传统玉米相当。Cry1Ab、PAT或mEPSPS蛋白与其他已知毒素或IgE过敏原没有序列相似性,也没有引起IgE介导的过敏反应的报道。然而,一些研究表明,哭泣蛋白在过敏反应中作为佐剂的潜在作用。根据目前的知识,VKM转基因专家小组得出结论,玉米Bt11 x GA21在营养上与传统玉米品种相当。与传统玉米相比,Cry1Ab、PAT或mEPSPS蛋白不太可能在基于玉米Bt11 × GA21的食品或饲料中引入毒性或致敏性。环境风险评估:EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49申请的范围包括进口和加工用于食品和饲料用途的玉米堆Bt11x GA21。考虑到玉米Bt11 × GA21的预期用途(不包括种植),环境风险评估涉及在运输和加工过程中有活性的谷物意外释放到环境中,以及间接暴露,主要是通过饲喂玉米Bt11 × GA21谷物的动物的粪便和粪便。玉米Bt11 × GA21没有改变生存、繁殖或传播特性,并且没有迹象表明,如果玉米Bt11 × GA21的种子意外释放到环境中,野生玉米植物传播和建立的可能性增加。玉米是玉米属在欧洲的唯一代表,在栽培之外没有杂交相容的野生或杂草亲缘种。VKM转基因小组认为,在挪威,基因从偶尔的野生转基因玉米植物流向传统玉米品种的风险可以忽略不计。考虑到作为食品和饲料的预期用途,转基因生物小组认为与生物和非生物环境的相互作用不是一个问题。总体结论:根据目前的知识,VKM转基因专家小组得出结论,玉米Bt11 x GA21在营养上与传统玉米品种相当。与传统玉米相比,Cry1Ab、PAT或mEPSPS蛋白不太可能在基于玉米Bt11 × GA21的食品或饲料中引入毒性或致敏性。VKM转基因生物小组同样得出结论,根据目前的知识,玉米Bt11 x GA21在挪威的预期用途方面与传统玉米品种的环境风险相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food/Feed and Environmental Risk Assessment of Insect-Resistant and Herbicide-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize Bt11 x GA21 in the European Union under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49)
In preparation for a legal implementation of EU-regulation 1829/2003, the Norwegian Environment Agency (former Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management) has requested the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA) to give final opinions on all genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union under Directive 2001/18/EC or Regulation 1829/2003/EC within the Authority’s sectoral responsibility.  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore, by letter dated 13 February 2013 (ref. 2012/150202), requested the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) to carry out scientific risk assessments of 39 GMOs and products containing or consisting of GMOs that are authorized in the European Union. The request covers scope(s) relevant to the Gene Technology Act. The request does not cover GMOs that VKM already has conducted its final risk assessments on. However, the Agency requests VKM to consider whether updates or other changes to earlier submitted assessments are necessary.  The insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 (Unique Identifier  SYN-BTØ11-1 x MON-ØØØ21-9 ) from Syngenta Seeds  is approved under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 for food and feed uses, import and processing since  28 July 2010 (Commission Decision 2010/4263/EC). Genetically modified maize Bt11 x GA21 has previously been risk assessed by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), commissioned by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority  and the Norwegian Environment Agency related to the EFSAs public hearing of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49  in 2008 (VKM 2009a). In addition, Bt11 and GA21 has been evaluated by the VKM GMO Panel as single events and as a component of several stacked GM maize events (VKM 2005a,b, 2007, 2008, 2009b,c,d, 2010, 2012a,b).  The food/feed and environmental risk assessment of the maize Bt11x GA21 is based on information provided by the applicant in the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49, and scientific comments from EFSA and other member states made available on the EFSA website GMO Extranet. The risk assessment also considered other peer-reviewed scientific literature as relevant.    The VKM GMO Panel has evaluated Bt11 x GA21 with reference to its intended uses in the European Economic Area (EEA), and according to the principles described in the Norwegian Food Act, the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act, Directive 2001/18/EC on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms, and Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety has also decided to take account of the appropriate principles described in the EFSA guidelines for the risk assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed (EFSA 2011a), the environmental risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2010), selection of comparators for the risk assessment of GM plants (EFSA 2011b) and for the post-market environmental monitoring of GM plants (EFSA 2011c).   The scientific risk assessment of maize Bt11x GA21 include molecular characterisation of the inserted DNA and expression of novel proteins, comparative assessment of agronomic and phenotypic characteristics, nutritional assessments, toxicology and allergenicity, unintended effects on plant fitness, potential for gene transfer, interactions between the GM plant and target and non-target organisms and effects on biogeochemical processes.  It is emphasized that the VKM mandate does not include assessments of contribution to sustainable development, societal utility and ethical considerations, according to the Norwegian Gene Technology Act and Regulations relating to impact assessment pursuant to the Gene Technology Act. These considerations are therefore not part of the risk assessment provided by the VKM Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms.   The genetically modified maize stack Bt11 x GA21 has been produced by conventional crossing between inbred lines of maize containing the single events Bt11 and GA21. The F1 hybrid was developed to provide protection against certain lepidopteran target pests, and to confer tolerance to glufosinate-ammonium and glyphosate-based herbicides.   Molecular Characterization: Southern blot and PCR analyses have indicated that the recombinant inserts in the parental maize lines Bt11 and GA21 are retained in the stacked maize Bt11 x GA21. Genetic stability of the inserts has previously been demonstrated in the parental maize lines. Protein measurements show comparable levels of the Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins between the stacked and single maize lines. Phenotypic analyses also indicate stability of the insect resistance and herbicide tolerance traits in the stacked maize. The VKM Panel on GMO considers the molecular characterisation of maize Bt11 x GA21 and its parental events Bt11 and GA21 as adequate.   Comparative Assessment:mComparative analyses of data from field trials located at representative sites and environments in North America during the 2005 growing season indicate that maize stack Bt11 x GA21 is compositionally, agronomically and phenotypically equivalent to its conventional counterpart, with the exception of the insect resistance and the herbicide tolerance, conferred by the expression of Cry1Ab, PAT and mEPSPS proteins.  Based on the assessment of available data, the VKM GMO Panel is of the opinion that conventional crossing of maize Bt11 and GA21 to produce the hybrid Bt11 x GA21 does not result in interactions between the newly expressed proteins affecting composition and agronomic characteristics.    Food and Feed Risk Assessment: A whole food feeding study on broilers has not indicated any adverse health effects of maize Bt11 x GA21, and shows that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize. The Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins do not show sequence resemblance to other known        toxins or IgE allergens, nor have they been reported to cause IgE mediated allergic reactions. Some studies have however indicated a potential role of Cry-proteins as adjuvants in allergic reactions.  Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize.  Environmental Risk Assessment: The scope of the application EFSA/GMO/UK/2007/49 includes import and processing of maize stack Bt11x GA21 for food and feed uses. Considering the intended uses of maize Bt11 x GA21, excluding cultivation, the environmental risk assessment is concerned with accidental release into the environment of viable grains during transportation and processing, and indirect exposure, mainly through manure and faeces from animals fed grains from maize Bt11 x GA21.   Maize Bt11 x GA21 has no altered survival, multiplication or dissemination characteristics, and there are no indications of an increased likelihood of spread and establishment of feral maize plants in the case of accidental release into the environment of seeds from maize Bt11 x GA21. Maize is the only representative of the genus Zea in Europe, and there are no cross-compatible wild or weedy relatives outside cultivation. The VKM GMO Panel considers the risk of gene flow from occasional feral GM.  Maize plants to conventional maize varieties to be negligible in Norway. Considering the intended use as food and feed, interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment are not considered by the GMO Panel to be an issue.  Overall Conclusion: Based on current knowledge, the VKM GMO Panel concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21 is nutritionally equivalent to conventional maize varieties. It is unlikely that the Cry1Ab, PAT or mEPSPS proteins will introduce a toxic or allergenic potential in food or feed based on maize Bt11 x GA21 compared to conventional maize. The VKM GMO Panel likewise concludes that maize Bt11 x GA21, based on current knowledge, is comparable to conventional maize varieties concerning environmental risk in Norway with the intended usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Essential Amino Acid Composition of Noodles Analogue from Aerial Yam, Rice and African Yam Bean Flour Blend Using Response Surface Methodology Hygienic Quality of Mbala-pinda, a Fermented Food Formulated from Local Products of Congo Occurrence of Virulent and Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Selected Ready-To-Eat Foods in Obio/Akpor, Rivers State, Nigeria Influence of Starch Content on the Sensory and Rheological Quality of Fermented Soy Milk Variability in Health Impact: Examining Lifestyle and Dietary Habits Across Different Stages of Adolescence: A Comprehensive Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1