“转移语言-切断词线”:病毒拓扑和威廉·巴勒斯的切割

Q4 Social Sciences Errgo Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.31261/ERRGO.8118
M. Hanuszkiewicz
{"title":"“转移语言-切断词线”:病毒拓扑和威廉·巴勒斯的切割","authors":"M. Hanuszkiewicz","doi":"10.31261/ERRGO.8118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Burroughs perceived the method of collage as a way towards a rebellion – an insurrection against the system of control inherent in language itself. In this article, a vision of language as a parasitic life-form presented by Burroughs in books such as The Ticket That Exploded and Nova Express is examined. The method of collage (or, as Burroughs calls it, the cut-up) is analyzed as an opportunity to tear down the oppressive structures of meaning self-reproducing themselves through our adherence to sociolinguistic rules. The very notion of struggling with parasites of meaning is connected with Roland Barthes’s conceptualization of myths as layers of meaning that envelop and parasitize signs in order to further their own agendas. I endeavor to reformulate Barthes’s dyadic model of myths into a triadic one (following Peircean semiotics), which I then relate to Jeffrey Elman’s text on language as a dynamic system, which allows for an in-depth perception of the way in which the parasite of language is described by Burroughs.","PeriodicalId":34358,"journal":{"name":"Errgo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Shift Linguals – Cut Word Lines”: Viral Topology and the Cut-Ups of William Burroughs\",\"authors\":\"M. Hanuszkiewicz\",\"doi\":\"10.31261/ERRGO.8118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"William Burroughs perceived the method of collage as a way towards a rebellion – an insurrection against the system of control inherent in language itself. In this article, a vision of language as a parasitic life-form presented by Burroughs in books such as The Ticket That Exploded and Nova Express is examined. The method of collage (or, as Burroughs calls it, the cut-up) is analyzed as an opportunity to tear down the oppressive structures of meaning self-reproducing themselves through our adherence to sociolinguistic rules. The very notion of struggling with parasites of meaning is connected with Roland Barthes’s conceptualization of myths as layers of meaning that envelop and parasitize signs in order to further their own agendas. I endeavor to reformulate Barthes’s dyadic model of myths into a triadic one (following Peircean semiotics), which I then relate to Jeffrey Elman’s text on language as a dynamic system, which allows for an in-depth perception of the way in which the parasite of language is described by Burroughs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Errgo\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Errgo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31261/ERRGO.8118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Errgo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/ERRGO.8118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

William Burroughs认为拼贴的方法是一种反抗——一种反抗语言本身固有的控制系统的反抗。本文考察了巴勒斯在《爆炸的车票》和《新星快车》等书中提出的语言作为一种寄生生命形式的观点。拼贴的方法(或者,正如Burroughs所说的,切割)被分析为一个机会,通过我们对社会语言学规则的遵守来摧毁意义自我复制的压迫结构。与意义的寄生虫斗争的概念与罗兰·巴特的神话概念化有关,神话是一层又一层的意义,它们包裹和寄生着符号,以进一步推进它们自己的议程。我试图将巴特的二元神话模型重新表述为三元神话模型(遵循皮尔森的符号学),然后我将其与杰弗里·埃尔曼关于语言作为一个动态系统的文本联系起来,这使得我们能够深入理解巴勒斯描述语言寄生虫的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Shift Linguals – Cut Word Lines”: Viral Topology and the Cut-Ups of William Burroughs
William Burroughs perceived the method of collage as a way towards a rebellion – an insurrection against the system of control inherent in language itself. In this article, a vision of language as a parasitic life-form presented by Burroughs in books such as The Ticket That Exploded and Nova Express is examined. The method of collage (or, as Burroughs calls it, the cut-up) is analyzed as an opportunity to tear down the oppressive structures of meaning self-reproducing themselves through our adherence to sociolinguistic rules. The very notion of struggling with parasites of meaning is connected with Roland Barthes’s conceptualization of myths as layers of meaning that envelop and parasitize signs in order to further their own agendas. I endeavor to reformulate Barthes’s dyadic model of myths into a triadic one (following Peircean semiotics), which I then relate to Jeffrey Elman’s text on language as a dynamic system, which allows for an in-depth perception of the way in which the parasite of language is described by Burroughs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Errgo
Errgo Arts and Humanities-General Arts and Humanities
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Nieznośna kruchość bytu – literatura Młodej Polski wobec chorób ciała i ducha Cięcie - ćwiczenia z metafizyki ciała Epidemia jako performans więcej-niż-ludzki Rana jako otwarcie na świat. O kategorii ranliwości w poezji Małgorzaty Lebdy Poezja otwartych ran. Stygmateksty Teresy Ferenc
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1