临床试验或研究项目参与状况对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后住院死亡率的影响

Tadao Aikawa, T. Kuno, J. Van den Eynde, A. Briasoulis, Aaqib H. Malik
{"title":"临床试验或研究项目参与状况对经导管主动脉瓣植入术后住院死亡率的影响","authors":"Tadao Aikawa, T. Kuno, J. Van den Eynde, A. Briasoulis, Aaqib H. Malik","doi":"10.1161/JAHA.121.025920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he development of novel devices and the favorable results of several randomized clinical trials have allowed for the rapid expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to elderly patients with aortic stenosis across all risk categories 1 ; however, the highly selected populations that are typically enrolled in randomized clinical trials may limit generalizability of the results to the real- world population with aortic stenosis. Furthermore, clinical trial or research program participation itself can facilitate behavior change in patients and health care providers and may contribute to improved patient outcomes, which is known as the “Hawthorne effect.” 2 Previous studies reported that research participation was associated with better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome. 3,4 Given the lack of data exploring the effect of research participation on outcomes after TAVI, we compared the short- term survival after TAVI between clinical research participants and nonparticipants using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon rea-sonable request. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is the largest publicly available all- payer inpatient health care database in the United States and did not require ethical approval. All patients who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2019 (n=56 648) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using the following International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD- 10- CM) codes: 02RF37H, 02RF37Z, 02RF38H, 02RF38Z, 02RF3JH, 02RF3JZ, 02RF3KH, and 02RF3KZ. Patients with age ≤18 years (n=22), cirrhosis (n=760), end- stage renal disease (n=2136), do- not- resuscitate status or palliative care in-volvement (n=383), and cancer (n=1952) were excluded with reference to previous trials. Patients with missing data (n=12) were also excluded. Research participation status was identified using ICD- 10- CM code Z00.6, 4 which was restricted to code as the primary diagnosis or first secondary diagnosis to avoid overcapturing. The hospital research participation","PeriodicalId":17189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Clinical Trial or Research Program Participation Status on In‐Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation\",\"authors\":\"Tadao Aikawa, T. Kuno, J. Van den Eynde, A. Briasoulis, Aaqib H. Malik\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/JAHA.121.025920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he development of novel devices and the favorable results of several randomized clinical trials have allowed for the rapid expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to elderly patients with aortic stenosis across all risk categories 1 ; however, the highly selected populations that are typically enrolled in randomized clinical trials may limit generalizability of the results to the real- world population with aortic stenosis. Furthermore, clinical trial or research program participation itself can facilitate behavior change in patients and health care providers and may contribute to improved patient outcomes, which is known as the “Hawthorne effect.” 2 Previous studies reported that research participation was associated with better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome. 3,4 Given the lack of data exploring the effect of research participation on outcomes after TAVI, we compared the short- term survival after TAVI between clinical research participants and nonparticipants using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon rea-sonable request. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is the largest publicly available all- payer inpatient health care database in the United States and did not require ethical approval. All patients who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2019 (n=56 648) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using the following International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD- 10- CM) codes: 02RF37H, 02RF37Z, 02RF38H, 02RF38Z, 02RF3JH, 02RF3JZ, 02RF3KH, and 02RF3KZ. Patients with age ≤18 years (n=22), cirrhosis (n=760), end- stage renal disease (n=2136), do- not- resuscitate status or palliative care in-volvement (n=383), and cancer (n=1952) were excluded with reference to previous trials. Patients with missing data (n=12) were also excluded. Research participation status was identified using ICD- 10- CM code Z00.6, 4 which was restricted to code as the primary diagnosis or first secondary diagnosis to avoid overcapturing. The hospital research participation\",\"PeriodicalId\":17189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.121.025920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新型装置的发展和几项随机临床试验的良好结果使得经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)迅速扩展到所有风险类别的老年主动脉瓣狭窄患者1;然而,随机临床试验中典型的高选择性人群可能限制了结果对真实世界主动脉瓣狭窄人群的推广。此外,参与临床试验或研究项目本身可以促进患者和医疗保健提供者的行为改变,并可能有助于改善患者的治疗结果,这被称为“霍桑效应”。先前的研究报道,参与研究与急性冠状动脉综合征患者更好的生存率相关。3,4由于缺乏研究参与对TAVI后预后影响的数据,我们使用全国住院患者样本比较了临床研究参与者和非参与者在TAVI后的短期生存。支持本研究结果的数据可在合理要求下从通讯作者处获得。全国住院病人样本是美国最大的可公开获得的所有付款人住院病人卫生保健数据库,不需要伦理批准。所有2013年至2019年期间接受TAVI的患者(n=56 648)均来自全国住院患者样本,使用以下国际疾病分类第十版临床修改(ICD- 10- CM)代码:02RF37H, 02RF37Z, 02RF38H, 02RF38Z, 02RF3JH, 02RF3JZ, 02RF3KH和02RF3KZ。年龄≤18岁(n=22)、肝硬化(n=760)、终末期肾病(n=2136)、无复苏状态或参与姑息治疗(n=383)和癌症(n=1952)的患者参照既往试验被排除。数据缺失的患者(n=12)也被排除在外。使用ICD- 10- CM代码Z00.6, 4确定研究参与状态,为避免过度捕获,将代码限制为主要诊断或首次次要诊断。医院研究参与情况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of Clinical Trial or Research Program Participation Status on In‐Hospital Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
he development of novel devices and the favorable results of several randomized clinical trials have allowed for the rapid expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to elderly patients with aortic stenosis across all risk categories 1 ; however, the highly selected populations that are typically enrolled in randomized clinical trials may limit generalizability of the results to the real- world population with aortic stenosis. Furthermore, clinical trial or research program participation itself can facilitate behavior change in patients and health care providers and may contribute to improved patient outcomes, which is known as the “Hawthorne effect.” 2 Previous studies reported that research participation was associated with better survival in patients with acute coronary syndrome. 3,4 Given the lack of data exploring the effect of research participation on outcomes after TAVI, we compared the short- term survival after TAVI between clinical research participants and nonparticipants using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon rea-sonable request. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample is the largest publicly available all- payer inpatient health care database in the United States and did not require ethical approval. All patients who underwent TAVI between 2013 and 2019 (n=56 648) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample using the following International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD- 10- CM) codes: 02RF37H, 02RF37Z, 02RF38H, 02RF38Z, 02RF3JH, 02RF3JZ, 02RF3KH, and 02RF3KZ. Patients with age ≤18 years (n=22), cirrhosis (n=760), end- stage renal disease (n=2136), do- not- resuscitate status or palliative care in-volvement (n=383), and cancer (n=1952) were excluded with reference to previous trials. Patients with missing data (n=12) were also excluded. Research participation status was identified using ICD- 10- CM code Z00.6, 4 which was restricted to code as the primary diagnosis or first secondary diagnosis to avoid overcapturing. The hospital research participation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Survival in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Active Cancer: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Treatment of Slow‐Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow‐Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN‐FLOW Study Predicting Arterial Thrombotic Events Following Peripheral Revascularization Using Objective Viscoelastic Data Safety of Catheter Ablation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Amyloidosis Corin Missense Variants, Blood Pressure, and Hypertension in 11 322 Black Individuals: Insights From REGARDS and the Jackson Heart Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1