2019冠状病毒病大流行初期(2020年2月至5月)尼日利亚卫生保健设施感染预防和控制准备情况评估

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Infection Prevention Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1177/17571774211060418
Tochi Joy Okwor, Josephine G Gatua, C. Umeokonkwo, S. Abah, I. Ike, A. Ogunniyi, O. Ipadeola, Timothy A Attah, H. Assad, Jerome Dooga, A. Olayinka, J. Abubakar, J. Oladejo, O. Aderinola, C. Eneh, E. Ilori, Priscilla Ibekwe, C. Ochu, C. Ihekweazu
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行初期(2020年2月至5月)尼日利亚卫生保健设施感染预防和控制准备情况评估","authors":"Tochi Joy Okwor, Josephine G Gatua, C. Umeokonkwo, S. Abah, I. Ike, A. Ogunniyi, O. Ipadeola, Timothy A Attah, H. Assad, Jerome Dooga, A. Olayinka, J. Abubakar, J. Oladejo, O. Aderinola, C. Eneh, E. Ilori, Priscilla Ibekwe, C. Ochu, C. Ihekweazu","doi":"10.1177/17571774211060418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Infection prevention and control (IPC) activities play a large role in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings. This study describes the state of IPC preparedness within health facilities in Nigeria during the early phase of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods We carried out a cross sectional study of health facilities across Nigeria using a COVID-19 IPC checklist adapted from the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The IPC aspects assessed were the existence of IPC committee and teams with terms of reference and workplans, IPC training, availability of personal protective equipment and having systems in place for screening, isolation and notification of COVID-19 patients. Existence of the assessed aspects was regarded as preparedness in that aspect. Results In total, 461 health facilities comprising, 350 (75.9%) private and 111 (24.1%) public health facilities participated. Only 19 (4.1%) health facilities were COVID-19 treatment centres with 68% of these being public health facilities. Public health facilities were better prepared in the areas of IPC programme with 69.7% of them having an IPC focal point versus 32.3% of private facilities. More public facilities (59.6%) had an IPC workplan versus 26.8% of private facilities. Neither the public nor the private facilities were adequately prepared for triaging, screening, and notifying suspected cases, as well as having trained staff and equipment to implement triaging. Conclusions The results highlight the need for government, organisations and policymakers to establish conducive IPC structures to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in healthcare settings.","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":"5 1","pages":"101 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of infection prevention and control preparedness of healthcare facilities in Nigeria in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (February–May 2020)\",\"authors\":\"Tochi Joy Okwor, Josephine G Gatua, C. Umeokonkwo, S. Abah, I. Ike, A. Ogunniyi, O. Ipadeola, Timothy A Attah, H. Assad, Jerome Dooga, A. Olayinka, J. Abubakar, J. Oladejo, O. Aderinola, C. Eneh, E. Ilori, Priscilla Ibekwe, C. Ochu, C. Ihekweazu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17571774211060418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Infection prevention and control (IPC) activities play a large role in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings. This study describes the state of IPC preparedness within health facilities in Nigeria during the early phase of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods We carried out a cross sectional study of health facilities across Nigeria using a COVID-19 IPC checklist adapted from the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The IPC aspects assessed were the existence of IPC committee and teams with terms of reference and workplans, IPC training, availability of personal protective equipment and having systems in place for screening, isolation and notification of COVID-19 patients. Existence of the assessed aspects was regarded as preparedness in that aspect. Results In total, 461 health facilities comprising, 350 (75.9%) private and 111 (24.1%) public health facilities participated. Only 19 (4.1%) health facilities were COVID-19 treatment centres with 68% of these being public health facilities. Public health facilities were better prepared in the areas of IPC programme with 69.7% of them having an IPC focal point versus 32.3% of private facilities. More public facilities (59.6%) had an IPC workplan versus 26.8% of private facilities. Neither the public nor the private facilities were adequately prepared for triaging, screening, and notifying suspected cases, as well as having trained staff and equipment to implement triaging. Conclusions The results highlight the need for government, organisations and policymakers to establish conducive IPC structures to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in healthcare settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211060418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774211060418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:感染预防和控制(IPC)活动在预防SARS-CoV-2在卫生保健环境中的传播方面发挥着重要作用。本研究描述了在冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的早期阶段,尼日利亚卫生设施内的IPC防范状况。方法我们使用改编自美国疾病控制和预防中心的COVID-19 IPC清单,对尼日利亚各地的卫生设施进行了横断面研究。评估的IPC方面包括是否存在具有权限和工作计划的IPC委员会和小组、IPC培训、个人防护装备的可用性以及是否有筛查、隔离和通知COVID-19患者的系统。已评估的方面的存在被视为该方面的准备工作。结果共有461家卫生机构参与调查,其中民营卫生机构350家(75.9%),公共卫生机构111家(24.1%)。只有19个卫生设施(4.1%)是COVID-19治疗中心,其中68%是公共卫生设施。公共卫生设施在IPC方案领域的准备较好,其中69.7%的公共卫生设施设有IPC联络点,而私营设施的这一比例为32.3%。更多的公共设施(59.6%)有IPC工作计划,而私营设施的这一比例为26.8%。公共和私营机构都没有为分诊、筛查和通报疑似病例做好充分准备,也没有训练有素的工作人员和设备来实施分诊。结论政府、组织和政策制定者需要建立有利的IPC结构,以降低COVID-19在卫生保健环境中的传播风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of infection prevention and control preparedness of healthcare facilities in Nigeria in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic (February–May 2020)
Background Infection prevention and control (IPC) activities play a large role in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare settings. This study describes the state of IPC preparedness within health facilities in Nigeria during the early phase of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods We carried out a cross sectional study of health facilities across Nigeria using a COVID-19 IPC checklist adapted from the U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The IPC aspects assessed were the existence of IPC committee and teams with terms of reference and workplans, IPC training, availability of personal protective equipment and having systems in place for screening, isolation and notification of COVID-19 patients. Existence of the assessed aspects was regarded as preparedness in that aspect. Results In total, 461 health facilities comprising, 350 (75.9%) private and 111 (24.1%) public health facilities participated. Only 19 (4.1%) health facilities were COVID-19 treatment centres with 68% of these being public health facilities. Public health facilities were better prepared in the areas of IPC programme with 69.7% of them having an IPC focal point versus 32.3% of private facilities. More public facilities (59.6%) had an IPC workplan versus 26.8% of private facilities. Neither the public nor the private facilities were adequately prepared for triaging, screening, and notifying suspected cases, as well as having trained staff and equipment to implement triaging. Conclusions The results highlight the need for government, organisations and policymakers to establish conducive IPC structures to reduce the risk of COVID-19 transmission in healthcare settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
期刊最新文献
Diary. Letter re: Optimizing healthcare staffing for infection prevention: Insights from the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology's staffing pattern calculator. The effect of the theory of planned behavior based hand hygiene intervention program on the health outcomes and school absenteeism of the primary school students: Quasi-experimental study. Real-time intervention to increase daily chlorhexidine bathing and reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections. Letter re: Glove Use/Hand Disinfection-Index (GUHDI): A new metric for hand hygiene quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1