{"title":"基于再分析温度数据的Angell-Korshover 63站网络采样代表性评价","authors":"S. Shen","doi":"10.1142/S2424922X19500013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global climate observations from ground stations require an evaluation of the effectiveness of a station network, which is often an assessment of the geometric distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a sphere. The representativeness of the Angell–Korshover 63-station network (AK-network) is assessed in this paper. It is shown that AK-network can effectively sample the January global average temperature data of the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis from 1948 to 2015 when estimating inter-decadal variations, but it has large uncertainties for estimating linear trends. This paper describes a method for the assessment, and also includes an iterative numerical algorithm used to search for the locations of 63 uniformly distributed stations, named U63. The results of AK-63 and U63 are compared. The Appendix explains a problem of searching for the optimal distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a unit sphere in three-dimensional space under the condition of the maximum sum of the mutual distances among the points. The core R code for finding U63 is included. The R code can generate various interesting configurations for different [Formula: see text], among which one is particularly surprising: The configuration of 20 points is not a dodecahedron although the configurations for [Formula: see text], and 12 are tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, and icosahedron, respectively.","PeriodicalId":47145,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"1950001:1-1950001:12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Representativeness Assessment of the Angell-Korshover 63-Station Network Sampling Based on Reanalysis Temperature Data\",\"authors\":\"S. Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/S2424922X19500013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Global climate observations from ground stations require an evaluation of the effectiveness of a station network, which is often an assessment of the geometric distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a sphere. The representativeness of the Angell–Korshover 63-station network (AK-network) is assessed in this paper. It is shown that AK-network can effectively sample the January global average temperature data of the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis from 1948 to 2015 when estimating inter-decadal variations, but it has large uncertainties for estimating linear trends. This paper describes a method for the assessment, and also includes an iterative numerical algorithm used to search for the locations of 63 uniformly distributed stations, named U63. The results of AK-63 and U63 are compared. The Appendix explains a problem of searching for the optimal distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a unit sphere in three-dimensional space under the condition of the maximum sum of the mutual distances among the points. The core R code for finding U63 is included. The R code can generate various interesting configurations for different [Formula: see text], among which one is particularly surprising: The configuration of 20 points is not a dodecahedron although the configurations for [Formula: see text], and 12 are tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, and icosahedron, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis\",\"volume\":\"38 4 1\",\"pages\":\"1950001:1-1950001:12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X19500013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Data Science and Adaptive Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424922X19500013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Representativeness Assessment of the Angell-Korshover 63-Station Network Sampling Based on Reanalysis Temperature Data
Global climate observations from ground stations require an evaluation of the effectiveness of a station network, which is often an assessment of the geometric distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a sphere. The representativeness of the Angell–Korshover 63-station network (AK-network) is assessed in this paper. It is shown that AK-network can effectively sample the January global average temperature data of the NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis from 1948 to 2015 when estimating inter-decadal variations, but it has large uncertainties for estimating linear trends. This paper describes a method for the assessment, and also includes an iterative numerical algorithm used to search for the locations of 63 uniformly distributed stations, named U63. The results of AK-63 and U63 are compared. The Appendix explains a problem of searching for the optimal distribution of [Formula: see text] points on a unit sphere in three-dimensional space under the condition of the maximum sum of the mutual distances among the points. The core R code for finding U63 is included. The R code can generate various interesting configurations for different [Formula: see text], among which one is particularly surprising: The configuration of 20 points is not a dodecahedron although the configurations for [Formula: see text], and 12 are tetrahedron, octahedron, cube, and icosahedron, respectively.