亲子互动治疗组与常规治疗组儿童虐待潜能量表及父母压力指数的比较

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Child & Family Behavior Therapy Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005
Keri Bailey Whitacre, K. Foley, C. Jackson, R. Curtis, C. McNeil
{"title":"亲子互动治疗组与常规治疗组儿童虐待潜能量表及父母压力指数的比较","authors":"Keri Bailey Whitacre, K. Foley, C. Jackson, R. Curtis, C. McNeil","doi":"10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study compared Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in a group format to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) group format within a community setting. PCIT is typically conducted individually with caregiver and child in a clinical setting. Results showed decreases on the Parenting Stress Index (PSI-SF), for both treatment groups over time with the PCIT group reporting less parental stress than the TAU group. However, there was no difference between groups over time on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI). This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of delivering PCIT in a community setting. The implication for child welfare clinicians is that an evidence-based program such as PCIT, can serve more caregivers and children and decrease parents’ stress.","PeriodicalId":46418,"journal":{"name":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Child Abuse Potential Inventory and Parenting Stress Index with Families in the Parent-Child Interaction Therapy and Treatment as Usual Groups\",\"authors\":\"Keri Bailey Whitacre, K. Foley, C. Jackson, R. Curtis, C. McNeil\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study compared Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in a group format to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) group format within a community setting. PCIT is typically conducted individually with caregiver and child in a clinical setting. Results showed decreases on the Parenting Stress Index (PSI-SF), for both treatment groups over time with the PCIT group reporting less parental stress than the TAU group. However, there was no difference between groups over time on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI). This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of delivering PCIT in a community setting. The implication for child welfare clinicians is that an evidence-based program such as PCIT, can serve more caregivers and children and decrease parents’ stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child & Family Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child & Family Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child & Family Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2020.1782005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:本研究比较了社区环境中亲子互动治疗(PCIT)和常规治疗(TAU)的小组形式。PCIT通常在临床环境中由护理人员和儿童单独进行。结果显示,随着时间的推移,两个治疗组的父母压力指数(PSI-SF)都有所下降,PCIT组报告的父母压力低于TAU组。然而,在儿童虐待潜在量表(CAPI)上,各组之间没有差异。本研究为在社区环境中提供PCIT的有效性提供了初步证据。对儿童福利临床医生的启示是,一个以证据为基础的项目,如PCIT,可以为更多的照顾者和儿童服务,并减少父母的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparison of Child Abuse Potential Inventory and Parenting Stress Index with Families in the Parent-Child Interaction Therapy and Treatment as Usual Groups
Abstract This study compared Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) in a group format to a Treatment as Usual (TAU) group format within a community setting. PCIT is typically conducted individually with caregiver and child in a clinical setting. Results showed decreases on the Parenting Stress Index (PSI-SF), for both treatment groups over time with the PCIT group reporting less parental stress than the TAU group. However, there was no difference between groups over time on the Child Abuse Potential Inventory (CAPI). This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of delivering PCIT in a community setting. The implication for child welfare clinicians is that an evidence-based program such as PCIT, can serve more caregivers and children and decrease parents’ stress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Family Engagement in Mental Health Interventions for Young Children Effectiveness of Integrative Structural Family Therapy and Double ABCX Model on Marital Adjustment and Parenting Stress Among Parents of Children with Autism: Randomized Controlled Trial Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with an Autistic Child and Autistic Father: A Case Study Effectiveness of Filial Therapy on Preschool Children’s Internalization and Externalization Symptoms with an Insecure Attachment Style During Coronavirus Disease 19 in Tehran District 10 Newborn Handbook for New Dads: Expert Advice on How to Navigate Baby’s First Three Months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1