研究数字化:数字化方法的方向与挑战

IF 8.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Annual Review of Sociology Pub Date : 2017-07-31 DOI:10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053505
Keith N. Hampton
{"title":"研究数字化:数字化方法的方向与挑战","authors":"Keith N. Hampton","doi":"10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The methodological tool chest available to those who study digital technologies ranges from those that are uniquely digital methods to approaches that are well established in the social sciences. This domain of work includes the application of methods to answer questions about the relationship between digital technologies and the social world, as well as the use of digital methods to answer questions about the offline world. New or old, quantitative or qualitative, the methods used to study the digital have strengths and weaknesses unique to this area of research. These issues include questions about the scope of cyberethnography, the validity of trace data, and the analytical division between on- and offline interaction. This review focuses on an overview of different methods, their history, and their strengths and weaknesses as applied to the study of digital technologies, including ethnographic approaches, interviews, surveys, time and media diaries, trace data, and online experiments.","PeriodicalId":51353,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Sociology","volume":"80 1","pages":"167-188"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying the Digital: Directions and Challenges for Digital Methods\",\"authors\":\"Keith N. Hampton\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The methodological tool chest available to those who study digital technologies ranges from those that are uniquely digital methods to approaches that are well established in the social sciences. This domain of work includes the application of methods to answer questions about the relationship between digital technologies and the social world, as well as the use of digital methods to answer questions about the offline world. New or old, quantitative or qualitative, the methods used to study the digital have strengths and weaknesses unique to this area of research. These issues include questions about the scope of cyberethnography, the validity of trace data, and the analytical division between on- and offline interaction. This review focuses on an overview of different methods, their history, and their strengths and weaknesses as applied to the study of digital technologies, including ethnographic approaches, interviews, surveys, time and media diaries, trace data, and online experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"167-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"71\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053505\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-SOC-060116-053505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

摘要

研究数字技术的人可以使用的方法工具箱包括从独特的数字方法到在社会科学中已经建立的方法。这一领域的工作包括应用方法来回答有关数字技术与社会世界之间关系的问题,以及使用数字方法来回答有关离线世界的问题。新的或旧的,定量的或定性的,用于研究数字的方法在这个研究领域有其独特的优缺点。这些问题包括关于网络人种学的范围、追踪数据的有效性以及在线和离线交互之间的分析划分的问题。这篇综述着重概述了不同的方法,它们的历史,以及它们在数字技术研究中的优缺点,包括民族志方法、访谈、调查、时间和媒体日记、追踪数据和在线实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studying the Digital: Directions and Challenges for Digital Methods
The methodological tool chest available to those who study digital technologies ranges from those that are uniquely digital methods to approaches that are well established in the social sciences. This domain of work includes the application of methods to answer questions about the relationship between digital technologies and the social world, as well as the use of digital methods to answer questions about the offline world. New or old, quantitative or qualitative, the methods used to study the digital have strengths and weaknesses unique to this area of research. These issues include questions about the scope of cyberethnography, the validity of trace data, and the analytical division between on- and offline interaction. This review focuses on an overview of different methods, their history, and their strengths and weaknesses as applied to the study of digital technologies, including ethnographic approaches, interviews, surveys, time and media diaries, trace data, and online experiments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
1.90%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Sociology, established in 1975, provides comprehensive coverage of significant developments in the field of sociology. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including major theoretical and methodological advancements, as well as current research across major subfields within sociology. Topics Covered: Social Processes Institutions and Culture Organizations Political and Economic Sociology Stratification Demography Urban Sociology Social Policy Historical Sociology Major Developments in Sociology in Other Regions of the World Content: Review chapters within the journal typically delve into these topics, offering in-depth analyses and insights into various aspects of sociology. These chapters serve to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of the field's current state and recent advancements.
期刊最新文献
Food and Inequality Measuring Ethnic Diversity. Reproducibility in the Social Sciences. Zoning, Land Use, and the Reproduction of Urban Inequality. Negative Social Ties: Prevalence and Consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1