了解投资者在股权众筹平台上的联合投资

Jing Wu, Ling Liu, Yu Cao
{"title":"了解投资者在股权众筹平台上的联合投资","authors":"Jing Wu, Ling Liu, Yu Cao","doi":"10.1108/imds-09-2022-0538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeConsidering the unique characteristics of equity crowdfunding platforms including the removal of stringent structural barriers (e.g. lack of co-location), high visibility and traceability of investor characteristics, large pool of available investors and simplified transaction process, the authors aim to examine how the two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) unfold in this context by incorporating the contextual characteristics. The authors theorize an inverted U-shaped relationship between leader-backer similarity and the likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate on equity crowdfunding platforms. In addition, a leader–backer dyad is more likely to form new syndicates if the students have more prior co-investment ties.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study is based on data from the AngelList syndicate platform and a linear probability model (LPM) with fixed effects is adopted to estimate the syndicate formation.FindingsThe authors find that the similarity between a leader and a backer has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the leader and backer's likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate, which is different from the dominant homophily-based tie formation in venture capital (VC) syndicates and other digital platform contexts. Although equity crowdfunding platforms encourage the possibility of exploring new partners, investors are more likely to co-invest with others who have stronger prior ties.Originality/valueThis research theoretically contributes to the scant literature of equity crowdfunding syndicates by contextualizing two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) driving tie formation in VC syndicates and digital platforms.","PeriodicalId":13427,"journal":{"name":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","volume":"1 1","pages":"1599-1623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding investor co-investment in a syndicate on equity crowdfunding platforms\",\"authors\":\"Jing Wu, Ling Liu, Yu Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/imds-09-2022-0538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeConsidering the unique characteristics of equity crowdfunding platforms including the removal of stringent structural barriers (e.g. lack of co-location), high visibility and traceability of investor characteristics, large pool of available investors and simplified transaction process, the authors aim to examine how the two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) unfold in this context by incorporating the contextual characteristics. The authors theorize an inverted U-shaped relationship between leader-backer similarity and the likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate on equity crowdfunding platforms. In addition, a leader–backer dyad is more likely to form new syndicates if the students have more prior co-investment ties.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study is based on data from the AngelList syndicate platform and a linear probability model (LPM) with fixed effects is adopted to estimate the syndicate formation.FindingsThe authors find that the similarity between a leader and a backer has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the leader and backer's likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate, which is different from the dominant homophily-based tie formation in venture capital (VC) syndicates and other digital platform contexts. Although equity crowdfunding platforms encourage the possibility of exploring new partners, investors are more likely to co-invest with others who have stronger prior ties.Originality/valueThis research theoretically contributes to the scant literature of equity crowdfunding syndicates by contextualizing two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) driving tie formation in VC syndicates and digital platforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1599-1623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2022-0538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ind. Manag. Data Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-09-2022-0538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到股权众筹平台的独特特征,包括消除严格的结构障碍(例如缺乏共址),投资者特征的高可见性和可追溯性,大量可用投资者和简化的交易过程,作者旨在通过结合上下文特征来研究两种最普遍的机制(即同质性和重复关系)如何在此背景下展开。作者将领导者-支持者相似性与股权众筹平台上联合投资辛迪加的可能性之间的倒u型关系理论化。此外,如果学生之前有更多的共同投资关系,那么领导者-支持者二人组更有可能组建新的辛迪加。设计/方法/方法实证研究基于AngelList辛迪加平台的数据,采用固定效应的线性概率模型(LPM)来估计辛迪加的形成。作者发现,领导者和支持者之间的相似性与领导者和支持者共同投资辛迪加的可能性呈倒u型关系,这与风险投资(VC)辛迪加和其他数字平台背景下主导的基于同质性的关系形成不同。尽管股权众筹平台鼓励探索新合作伙伴的可能性,但投资者更有可能与先前关系较强的人共同投资。原创性/价值本研究通过将两种最普遍的机制(即同质性和重复关系)背景化,在VC财团和数字平台中推动关系形成,从理论上为股权众筹财团的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding investor co-investment in a syndicate on equity crowdfunding platforms
PurposeConsidering the unique characteristics of equity crowdfunding platforms including the removal of stringent structural barriers (e.g. lack of co-location), high visibility and traceability of investor characteristics, large pool of available investors and simplified transaction process, the authors aim to examine how the two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) unfold in this context by incorporating the contextual characteristics. The authors theorize an inverted U-shaped relationship between leader-backer similarity and the likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate on equity crowdfunding platforms. In addition, a leader–backer dyad is more likely to form new syndicates if the students have more prior co-investment ties.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical study is based on data from the AngelList syndicate platform and a linear probability model (LPM) with fixed effects is adopted to estimate the syndicate formation.FindingsThe authors find that the similarity between a leader and a backer has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the leader and backer's likelihood of co-investment in a syndicate, which is different from the dominant homophily-based tie formation in venture capital (VC) syndicates and other digital platform contexts. Although equity crowdfunding platforms encourage the possibility of exploring new partners, investors are more likely to co-invest with others who have stronger prior ties.Originality/valueThis research theoretically contributes to the scant literature of equity crowdfunding syndicates by contextualizing two most prevalent mechanisms (i.e. homophily and repeated ties) driving tie formation in VC syndicates and digital platforms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Big data analytics capability in building supply chain resilience: the moderating effect of innovation-focused complementary assets Effects of intrinsic and extrinsic cues on customer behavior in live streaming: evidence from an eye-tracking experiment How doctor image features engage health science short video viewers? Investigating the age and gender bias The impact of enterprise social media usage on employee creativity: a self-regulation perspective Implementation of information and communication technologies in fruit and vegetable supply chain: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1