Christian Komusiewicz, Pascal Kunz, Frank Sommer, Manuel Sorge
{"title":"关于计算最优树集成","authors":"Christian Komusiewicz, Pascal Kunz, Frank Sommer, Manuel Sorge","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2306.04423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Random forests and, more generally, (decision\\nobreakdash-)tree ensembles are widely used methods for classification and regression. Recent algorithmic advances allow to compute decision trees that are optimal for various measures such as their size or depth. We are not aware of such research for tree ensembles and aim to contribute to this area. Mainly, we provide two novel algorithms and corresponding lower bounds. First, we are able to carry over and substantially improve on tractability results for decision trees, obtaining a $(6\\delta D S)^S \\cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $S$ is the number of cuts in the tree ensemble, $D$ the largest domain size, and $\\delta$ is the largest number of features in which two examples differ. To achieve this, we introduce the witness-tree technique which also seems promising for practice. Second, we show that dynamic programming, which has been successful for decision trees, may also be viable for tree ensembles, providing an $\\ell^n \\cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $\\ell$ is the number of trees and $n$ the number of examples. Finally, we compare the number of cuts necessary to classify training data sets for decision trees and tree ensembles, showing that ensembles may need exponentially fewer cuts for increasing number of trees.","PeriodicalId":74529,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning","volume":"100 1","pages":"17364-17374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Computing Optimal Tree Ensembles\",\"authors\":\"Christian Komusiewicz, Pascal Kunz, Frank Sommer, Manuel Sorge\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2306.04423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Random forests and, more generally, (decision\\\\nobreakdash-)tree ensembles are widely used methods for classification and regression. Recent algorithmic advances allow to compute decision trees that are optimal for various measures such as their size or depth. We are not aware of such research for tree ensembles and aim to contribute to this area. Mainly, we provide two novel algorithms and corresponding lower bounds. First, we are able to carry over and substantially improve on tractability results for decision trees, obtaining a $(6\\\\delta D S)^S \\\\cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $S$ is the number of cuts in the tree ensemble, $D$ the largest domain size, and $\\\\delta$ is the largest number of features in which two examples differ. To achieve this, we introduce the witness-tree technique which also seems promising for practice. Second, we show that dynamic programming, which has been successful for decision trees, may also be viable for tree ensembles, providing an $\\\\ell^n \\\\cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $\\\\ell$ is the number of trees and $n$ the number of examples. Finally, we compare the number of cuts necessary to classify training data sets for decision trees and tree ensembles, showing that ensembles may need exponentially fewer cuts for increasing number of trees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"17364-17374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Machine Learning. International Conference on Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随机森林和更一般的(decision\nobreakdash-)树集成是广泛使用的分类和回归方法。最近的算法进步允许计算决策树,这是最优的各种措施,如他们的大小或深度。我们不知道这样的研究树的集合和目标是贡献这一领域。主要给出了两种新的算法和相应的下界。首先,我们能够延续并大幅改进决策树的可追溯性结果,获得$(6\delta D S)^S \cdot poly$ time算法,其中$S$是树集合中的切割数,$D$是最大域大小,$\delta$是两个示例不同的最大特征数。为了实现这一目标,我们引入了似乎也很有希望用于实践的见证树技术。其次,我们展示了动态规划,这已经成功的决策树,也可能是可行的树集成,提供了一个$\ well ^n \cdot聚$时间算法,其中$\ well $是树的数量,$n$是例子的数量。最后,我们比较了决策树和树集成分类训练数据集所需的切割次数,表明随着树数量的增加,集成可能需要的切割次数呈指数级减少。
Random forests and, more generally, (decision\nobreakdash-)tree ensembles are widely used methods for classification and regression. Recent algorithmic advances allow to compute decision trees that are optimal for various measures such as their size or depth. We are not aware of such research for tree ensembles and aim to contribute to this area. Mainly, we provide two novel algorithms and corresponding lower bounds. First, we are able to carry over and substantially improve on tractability results for decision trees, obtaining a $(6\delta D S)^S \cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $S$ is the number of cuts in the tree ensemble, $D$ the largest domain size, and $\delta$ is the largest number of features in which two examples differ. To achieve this, we introduce the witness-tree technique which also seems promising for practice. Second, we show that dynamic programming, which has been successful for decision trees, may also be viable for tree ensembles, providing an $\ell^n \cdot poly$-time algorithm, where $\ell$ is the number of trees and $n$ the number of examples. Finally, we compare the number of cuts necessary to classify training data sets for decision trees and tree ensembles, showing that ensembles may need exponentially fewer cuts for increasing number of trees.