{"title":"改良的团队学习模式对骨科课程学生学习的影响","authors":"K. Husein, E. Mahmoud","doi":"10.5812/jme-127652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This paper presents the results of a modified team-based learning (MTBL) in the Orthopaedic Department of the Omdurman Islamic University. It is a modification of the team-based learning (TBL) developed by Dr. Larry K. Michaelson, who explored the benefit of small group learning within large classes. TBL differs from other forms of small group work, which involves developing and using learning teams in large settings as an instructional strategy. Objectives: The main difference between conventional TBL and MTBL is that students learn in small groups in a single large class with a single facilitator in conventional TBL. In contrast, in MTBL, students learn in separate small classes with different facilitators. In this study, we investigated the impact of MTBL on the learning of students in an orthopaedic course. Students’ satisfaction and grades, following the MTBL for an orthopaedic class, were analyzed and compared to another batch of students in a conventional lecture learning strategy. The two batches were taught by the same faculty members. Methods: The MTBL was implemented as a teaching method in orthopaedics and traumatology course in 2020. A total of 282 students were surveyed for their satisfaction with this new pedagogical approach, and 153 students responded to the questionnaire. We adopted a self-administered questionnaire answering on a five-option Likert scale. The five options represented the levels of agreement. At the end of the course, students’ exam scores were compared to the results of their previous batch, in which teaching was carried out utilizing conventional lectures only (a total of 128 students). Results: The results showed that the majority of the students involved in the study (66.5%) were satisfied with the MTBL. The students thought that it increases the long retention of knowledge and should be used more frequently in the curriculum, and they recommend it to other students. The analysis of the examination results using the Chi-square test revealed a significant difference between the results of the students who studied the course in the form of MTBL and those who studied the course in the form of a traditional lecture with a clear improvement in the results following MTBL orthopaedic course (P-value = 0.0000). Conclusions: We, therefore, conclude that the MTBL where students are divided into separate small groups with different instructors improves the performance and the grades of the students in the exam. It also reveals that the students feel satisfied with the learning technique. We recommend it be more frequently used in the curriculum.","PeriodicalId":30594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education Development","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Modified Team-Based Learning on the Learning of Students in an Orthopaedic Course\",\"authors\":\"K. Husein, E. Mahmoud\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/jme-127652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This paper presents the results of a modified team-based learning (MTBL) in the Orthopaedic Department of the Omdurman Islamic University. It is a modification of the team-based learning (TBL) developed by Dr. Larry K. Michaelson, who explored the benefit of small group learning within large classes. TBL differs from other forms of small group work, which involves developing and using learning teams in large settings as an instructional strategy. Objectives: The main difference between conventional TBL and MTBL is that students learn in small groups in a single large class with a single facilitator in conventional TBL. In contrast, in MTBL, students learn in separate small classes with different facilitators. In this study, we investigated the impact of MTBL on the learning of students in an orthopaedic course. Students’ satisfaction and grades, following the MTBL for an orthopaedic class, were analyzed and compared to another batch of students in a conventional lecture learning strategy. The two batches were taught by the same faculty members. Methods: The MTBL was implemented as a teaching method in orthopaedics and traumatology course in 2020. A total of 282 students were surveyed for their satisfaction with this new pedagogical approach, and 153 students responded to the questionnaire. We adopted a self-administered questionnaire answering on a five-option Likert scale. The five options represented the levels of agreement. At the end of the course, students’ exam scores were compared to the results of their previous batch, in which teaching was carried out utilizing conventional lectures only (a total of 128 students). Results: The results showed that the majority of the students involved in the study (66.5%) were satisfied with the MTBL. The students thought that it increases the long retention of knowledge and should be used more frequently in the curriculum, and they recommend it to other students. The analysis of the examination results using the Chi-square test revealed a significant difference between the results of the students who studied the course in the form of MTBL and those who studied the course in the form of a traditional lecture with a clear improvement in the results following MTBL orthopaedic course (P-value = 0.0000). Conclusions: We, therefore, conclude that the MTBL where students are divided into separate small groups with different instructors improves the performance and the grades of the students in the exam. It also reveals that the students feel satisfied with the learning technique. We recommend it be more frequently used in the curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education Development\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/jme-127652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jme-127652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本文介绍了改进的团队学习(MTBL)在恩图曼伊斯兰大学骨科的结果。它是Larry K. Michaelson博士开发的基于团队的学习(TBL)的改进,他探索了在大班中进行小组学习的好处。TBL不同于其他形式的小组工作,后者涉及在大型环境中发展和使用学习团队作为一种教学策略。目的:传统TBL和MTBL的主要区别在于,在传统TBL中,学生在一个大班中以小组形式学习,由一个辅导员指导。相比之下,在MTBL中,学生在不同的辅导员的指导下,在单独的小班学习。在本研究中,我们调查了MTBL对学生骨科课程学习的影响。本研究以骨科课堂为研究对象,分析与比较采用传统课堂学习策略的学生的满意度与成绩。这两批由相同的教员授课。方法:2020年在骨科与创伤学课程中实施MTBL教学方法。共有282名学生对这种新的教学方法的满意度进行了调查,153名学生回答了问卷。我们采用了一份自我管理的李克特五选项问卷。这五个选项代表了同意的程度。在课程结束时,将学生的考试成绩与前一批学生的成绩进行比较,前一批学生仅使用常规讲座进行教学(共128名学生)。结果:参与研究的学生中,对MTBL满意的占66.5%。学生们认为它增加了对知识的长期记忆,应该在课程中更频繁地使用,并向其他学生推荐它。通过卡方检验对考试成绩进行分析,发现以MTBL形式学习课程的学生与以传统讲座形式学习课程的学生成绩有显著差异,MTBL骨科课程后成绩有明显提高(p值= 0.0000)。结论:因此,我们得出结论,在MTBL中,学生被分成不同的小组,由不同的老师指导,可以提高学生的考试成绩和成绩。这也反映了学生对学习技巧的满意程度。我们建议在课程中更频繁地使用它。
The Impact of Modified Team-Based Learning on the Learning of Students in an Orthopaedic Course
Background: This paper presents the results of a modified team-based learning (MTBL) in the Orthopaedic Department of the Omdurman Islamic University. It is a modification of the team-based learning (TBL) developed by Dr. Larry K. Michaelson, who explored the benefit of small group learning within large classes. TBL differs from other forms of small group work, which involves developing and using learning teams in large settings as an instructional strategy. Objectives: The main difference between conventional TBL and MTBL is that students learn in small groups in a single large class with a single facilitator in conventional TBL. In contrast, in MTBL, students learn in separate small classes with different facilitators. In this study, we investigated the impact of MTBL on the learning of students in an orthopaedic course. Students’ satisfaction and grades, following the MTBL for an orthopaedic class, were analyzed and compared to another batch of students in a conventional lecture learning strategy. The two batches were taught by the same faculty members. Methods: The MTBL was implemented as a teaching method in orthopaedics and traumatology course in 2020. A total of 282 students were surveyed for their satisfaction with this new pedagogical approach, and 153 students responded to the questionnaire. We adopted a self-administered questionnaire answering on a five-option Likert scale. The five options represented the levels of agreement. At the end of the course, students’ exam scores were compared to the results of their previous batch, in which teaching was carried out utilizing conventional lectures only (a total of 128 students). Results: The results showed that the majority of the students involved in the study (66.5%) were satisfied with the MTBL. The students thought that it increases the long retention of knowledge and should be used more frequently in the curriculum, and they recommend it to other students. The analysis of the examination results using the Chi-square test revealed a significant difference between the results of the students who studied the course in the form of MTBL and those who studied the course in the form of a traditional lecture with a clear improvement in the results following MTBL orthopaedic course (P-value = 0.0000). Conclusions: We, therefore, conclude that the MTBL where students are divided into separate small groups with different instructors improves the performance and the grades of the students in the exam. It also reveals that the students feel satisfied with the learning technique. We recommend it be more frequently used in the curriculum.