强各向异性岩土材料破坏准则的评价

G. Duveau, J. F. Shao, J. P. Henry
{"title":"强各向异性岩土材料破坏准则的评价","authors":"G. Duveau,&nbsp;J. F. Shao,&nbsp;J. P. Henry","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199801)3:1<1::AID-CFM38>3.0.CO;2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper is devoted to the assessment of some representative failure criteria in the framework of modelling the failure behaviour of strongly anisotropic geomaterials. Experimental data concerning the failure behaviour of a typical strongly anisotropic rock; the schist of Angers are first presented. Nine widely used failure criteria are then selected and classified into three groups, the mathematical continuous models, the empirical continuous models and the discontinuous weakness planes based models. This classification is made up according to the main assumptions and techniques used in each criterion to describe the strength anisotropy. The calibration of each one is carried out with respect to the laboratory data of Angers schist. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between the selected criteria and with the experimental data are provided. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100899,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199801)3:1<1::AID-CFM38>3.0.CO;2-7","citationCount":"164","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of some failure criteria for strongly anisotropic geomaterials\",\"authors\":\"G. Duveau,&nbsp;J. F. Shao,&nbsp;J. P. Henry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199801)3:1<1::AID-CFM38>3.0.CO;2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper is devoted to the assessment of some representative failure criteria in the framework of modelling the failure behaviour of strongly anisotropic geomaterials. Experimental data concerning the failure behaviour of a typical strongly anisotropic rock; the schist of Angers are first presented. Nine widely used failure criteria are then selected and classified into three groups, the mathematical continuous models, the empirical continuous models and the discontinuous weakness planes based models. This classification is made up according to the main assumptions and techniques used in each criterion to describe the strength anisotropy. The calibration of each one is carried out with respect to the laboratory data of Angers schist. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between the selected criteria and with the experimental data are provided. © 1998 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1484(199801)3:1<1::AID-CFM38>3.0.CO;2-7\",\"citationCount\":\"164\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1484%28199801%293%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-CFM38%3E3.0.CO%3B2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Cohesive-frictional Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1484%28199801%293%3A1%3C1%3A%3AAID-CFM38%3E3.0.CO%3B2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 164

摘要

本文研究了在强各向异性岩土材料破坏行为模拟框架下的几种典型破坏准则的评价。典型强各向异性岩石破坏特性试验数据昂热的片岩是第一个被提出的。选取了常用的9种失效准则,并将其分为3类:数学连续模型、经验连续模型和基于不连续弱点面的模型。这种分类是根据描述强度各向异性的每个准则中使用的主要假设和技术组成的。根据昂热片岩的实验室数据,对每一种方法进行了标定。并将所选准则与实验数据进行了定性和定量比较。©1998 John Wiley &儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of some failure criteria for strongly anisotropic geomaterials

This paper is devoted to the assessment of some representative failure criteria in the framework of modelling the failure behaviour of strongly anisotropic geomaterials. Experimental data concerning the failure behaviour of a typical strongly anisotropic rock; the schist of Angers are first presented. Nine widely used failure criteria are then selected and classified into three groups, the mathematical continuous models, the empirical continuous models and the discontinuous weakness planes based models. This classification is made up according to the main assumptions and techniques used in each criterion to describe the strength anisotropy. The calibration of each one is carried out with respect to the laboratory data of Angers schist. Qualitative and quantitative comparisons between the selected criteria and with the experimental data are provided. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Instabilities in granular materials and application to landslides Computational Geomechanics with Special Reference to Earthquake Engineering, by O. C. Zienkiewicz, A. H. C. Chan, M. Pastor, B. A. Schrefler, T. Shiomi, by John Wiley, New York, 1999. ISBN 0-471-98285-7. GBP £100.00. Damage model for concrete-like materials coupling cracking and friction, contribution towards structural damping: first uniaxial applications Modelling of solid-phase sintering of hardmetal using a mesomechanics approach Modelling of solid‐phase sintering of hardmetal using a mesomechanics approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1