高压氧治疗作为治疗勃起功能障碍:一项荟萃分析。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Sexual medicine reviews Pub Date : 2023-12-23 DOI:10.1093/sxmrev/qead043
Gal Saffati, Taher Naeem, Maya Guhan, Alejandro Abello, David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Basil Kaaki, Blair T Stocks, Larry I Lipshultz, Mohit Khera
{"title":"高压氧治疗作为治疗勃起功能障碍:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Gal Saffati, Taher Naeem, Maya Guhan, Alejandro Abello, David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Basil Kaaki, Blair T Stocks, Larry I Lipshultz, Mohit Khera","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qead043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a medical treatment in which the patient is exposed to 100% oxygen at a higher than atmospheric pressure. Over the past few decades, HBOT has been used to treat a variety of medical conditions. In recent times, there has been a rising curiosity regarding the potential therapeutic benefits of HBOT in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study sought to review and meta-analyze available data regarding the use of HBOT for ED, including its potential mechanisms of action and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included only articles that evaluated the impact of HBOT on ED symptoms using the International Index of Erectile Function score. Prospective nonrandomized studies or randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Data extraction was performed in duplicate. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.41, and the presence of heterogeneity between studies was evaluated. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 studies that reported outcomes using the International Index of Erectile Function scores were included in this analysis. In patients with post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy-induced ED, the analysis showed a significant MD of -4.13 (95% CI, -6.08 to -2.18; P < .0001) in favor of the control group. Conversely, patients who received HBOT for reasons other than ED exhibited an MD of 4.58 (95% CI, 2.63 to 6.52; P < .00001). In the group that received HBOT for pure vasculogenic ED, the MD was 10.50 (95% CI, 9.92 to 11.08) in favor of HBOT. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a nonsignificant difference in erectile function scores, with an MD of 3.86 (95% CI, -2.13 to 9.86; P = .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of HBOT in the treatment of ED appears to be a promising approach. While further research is needed to establish the efficacy and long-term effects of this treatment, preliminary studies have shown encouraging results in terms of improving erectile function in men with vasculogenic ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a treatment for erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gal Saffati, Taher Naeem, Maya Guhan, Alejandro Abello, David Eugenio Hinojosa-Gonzalez, Basil Kaaki, Blair T Stocks, Larry I Lipshultz, Mohit Khera\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sxmrev/qead043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a medical treatment in which the patient is exposed to 100% oxygen at a higher than atmospheric pressure. Over the past few decades, HBOT has been used to treat a variety of medical conditions. In recent times, there has been a rising curiosity regarding the potential therapeutic benefits of HBOT in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study sought to review and meta-analyze available data regarding the use of HBOT for ED, including its potential mechanisms of action and effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included only articles that evaluated the impact of HBOT on ED symptoms using the International Index of Erectile Function score. Prospective nonrandomized studies or randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Data extraction was performed in duplicate. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.41, and the presence of heterogeneity between studies was evaluated. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5 studies that reported outcomes using the International Index of Erectile Function scores were included in this analysis. In patients with post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy-induced ED, the analysis showed a significant MD of -4.13 (95% CI, -6.08 to -2.18; P < .0001) in favor of the control group. Conversely, patients who received HBOT for reasons other than ED exhibited an MD of 4.58 (95% CI, 2.63 to 6.52; P < .00001). In the group that received HBOT for pure vasculogenic ED, the MD was 10.50 (95% CI, 9.92 to 11.08) in favor of HBOT. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a nonsignificant difference in erectile function scores, with an MD of 3.86 (95% CI, -2.13 to 9.86; P = .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of HBOT in the treatment of ED appears to be a promising approach. While further research is needed to establish the efficacy and long-term effects of this treatment, preliminary studies have shown encouraging results in terms of improving erectile function in men with vasculogenic ED.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexual medicine reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexual medicine reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:高压氧治疗(HBOT)是一种将患者暴露在高于大气压的100%氧气下的医学治疗。在过去的几十年里,HBOT已被用于治疗各种疾病。近年来,人们对HBOT治疗勃起功能障碍(ED)的潜在疗效越来越好奇。目的:本研究旨在回顾和荟萃分析关于使用HBOT治疗ED的现有数据,包括其潜在的作用机制和有效性。方法:我们只纳入了使用国际勃起功能指数评分评估HBOT对ED症状影响的文章。纳入前瞻性非随机研究或随机对照临床试验。数据提取分两份进行。使用Review Manager 5.41进行数据分析,评估研究之间是否存在异质性。结果以95%置信区间(CI)的均值差(MD)表示。结果:共有5项使用国际勃起功能指数评分报告结果的研究被纳入本分析。在机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后诱发ED的患者中,分析显示显著MD为-4.13 (95% CI, -6.08至-2.18;结论:使用HBOT治疗ED似乎是一种很有前途的方法。虽然需要进一步的研究来确定这种治疗的疗效和长期效果,但初步研究显示,在改善血管源性ED患者的勃起功能方面,结果令人鼓舞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a treatment for erectile dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Introduction: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a medical treatment in which the patient is exposed to 100% oxygen at a higher than atmospheric pressure. Over the past few decades, HBOT has been used to treat a variety of medical conditions. In recent times, there has been a rising curiosity regarding the potential therapeutic benefits of HBOT in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

Aims: The study sought to review and meta-analyze available data regarding the use of HBOT for ED, including its potential mechanisms of action and effectiveness.

Methods: We included only articles that evaluated the impact of HBOT on ED symptoms using the International Index of Erectile Function score. Prospective nonrandomized studies or randomized controlled clinical trials were included. Data extraction was performed in duplicate. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.41, and the presence of heterogeneity between studies was evaluated. The results were presented as the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: A total of 5 studies that reported outcomes using the International Index of Erectile Function scores were included in this analysis. In patients with post-robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy-induced ED, the analysis showed a significant MD of -4.13 (95% CI, -6.08 to -2.18; P < .0001) in favor of the control group. Conversely, patients who received HBOT for reasons other than ED exhibited an MD of 4.58 (95% CI, 2.63 to 6.52; P < .00001). In the group that received HBOT for pure vasculogenic ED, the MD was 10.50 (95% CI, 9.92 to 11.08) in favor of HBOT. A meta-analysis of these data revealed a nonsignificant difference in erectile function scores, with an MD of 3.86 (95% CI, -2.13 to 9.86; P = .21).

Conclusion: The use of HBOT in the treatment of ED appears to be a promising approach. While further research is needed to establish the efficacy and long-term effects of this treatment, preliminary studies have shown encouraging results in terms of improving erectile function in men with vasculogenic ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Is sexual function impaired in patients with primary headaches? A systematic review of observational studies. Erectile dysfunction as a holistic indicator of well-being: a narrative review. Analysis of evidence on nutraceutical interventions for Peyronie's disease: a guideline-based critical review. Sexual well-being among partnered adults and couples over 60: a scoping review. Beyond the discomfort: understanding and managing sexual pain in women, a comprehensive case-based discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1