不同睡眠健康维度与性别、年龄、教育、昼夜节律偏好和慢性失眠之间的关系:一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究

Bjørn Bjorvatn, Siri Waage, Ståle Pallesen, Daniel J Buysse, Ingvild W Saxvig
{"title":"不同睡眠健康维度与性别、年龄、教育、昼夜节律偏好和慢性失眠之间的关系:一项具有代表性的基于人群的研究","authors":"Bjørn Bjorvatn, Siri Waage, Ståle Pallesen, Daniel J Buysse, Ingvild W Saxvig","doi":"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to explore multidimensional sleep health and the different dimensions of sleep health in the adult Norwegian population in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A representative sample of 1028 Norwegians, aged 18 + years completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. Sleep health was measured with the multidimensional RU_SATED scale, which assesses the dimensions of regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration. Insomnia was assessed with the Bergen Insomnia Scale. Data were analyzed with chi-square tests, <i>t</i>-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and regression analyses, as appropriate. Response rate was 33.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep health was better in males, with increasing age, and with higher educational level, and was poorer in participants with evening preference and chronic insomnia, compared to their respective counterparts. When investigating the different sleep health dimensions, males scored better than females on satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.93), timing (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.88), and efficiency (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89). Older age was associated with better scores on regularity and satisfaction, whereas young age was associated with better scores on alertness and duration. High educational level was associated with better scores on alertness, timing, and duration. Evening types scored worse than morning types on regularity (aOR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.41), satisfaction (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.53), and timing (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.51). Participants with chronic insomnia scored worse than participants without insomnia on all six sleep health dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep health differed significantly in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia. However, specific group differences were not equally evident in all sleep health dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74808,"journal":{"name":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","volume":"4 1","pages":"zpad041"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between different sleep health dimensions and sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia: a representative population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Bjørn Bjorvatn, Siri Waage, Ståle Pallesen, Daniel J Buysse, Ingvild W Saxvig\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims were to explore multidimensional sleep health and the different dimensions of sleep health in the adult Norwegian population in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A representative sample of 1028 Norwegians, aged 18 + years completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. Sleep health was measured with the multidimensional RU_SATED scale, which assesses the dimensions of regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration. Insomnia was assessed with the Bergen Insomnia Scale. Data were analyzed with chi-square tests, <i>t</i>-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and regression analyses, as appropriate. Response rate was 33.5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep health was better in males, with increasing age, and with higher educational level, and was poorer in participants with evening preference and chronic insomnia, compared to their respective counterparts. When investigating the different sleep health dimensions, males scored better than females on satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.93), timing (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.88), and efficiency (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89). Older age was associated with better scores on regularity and satisfaction, whereas young age was associated with better scores on alertness and duration. High educational level was associated with better scores on alertness, timing, and duration. Evening types scored worse than morning types on regularity (aOR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.41), satisfaction (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.53), and timing (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.51). Participants with chronic insomnia scored worse than participants without insomnia on all six sleep health dimensions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sleep health differed significantly in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia. However, specific group differences were not equally evident in all sleep health dimensions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"zpad041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10635412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpad041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目的是探索多维睡眠健康和挪威成年人口中与性别、年龄、教育、昼夜节律偏好和慢性失眠相关的睡眠健康的不同方面。方法:1028名年龄在18岁以上的挪威人的代表性样本完成了一项基于网络的横断面调查。睡眠健康是用多维RU_SATED量表来衡量的,该量表评估规律性、满意度、警觉性、时间、效率和持续时间等维度。采用卑尔根失眠量表评估失眠症。数据分析采用卡方检验、t检验、单因素方差分析和回归分析。应答率为33.5%。结果:男性的睡眠健康状况较好,年龄越大,受教育程度越高,而偏好晚上和慢性失眠症的参与者的睡眠健康状况较差。在调查不同的睡眠健康维度时,男性在满意度(调整优势比[aOR] = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51至0.93)、时间(aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49至0.88)和效率(aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52至0.89)方面得分高于女性。老年人在规律性和满意度方面得分较高,而年轻人在警觉性和持续时间方面得分较高。高教育水平与警觉性、时间和持续时间得分较高相关。在规律性(aOR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.18 ~ 0.41)、满意度(aOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26 ~ 0.53)和时机(aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 ~ 0.51)方面,夜猫子比早起的人得分更差。患有慢性失眠症的参与者在所有六个睡眠健康方面的得分都低于没有失眠症的参与者。结论:睡眠健康与性别、年龄、教育程度、昼夜节律偏好和慢性失眠症有关。然而,在睡眠健康的所有方面,特定的组间差异并不同样明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association between different sleep health dimensions and sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia: a representative population-based study.

Objectives: The aims were to explore multidimensional sleep health and the different dimensions of sleep health in the adult Norwegian population in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia.

Methods: A representative sample of 1028 Norwegians, aged 18 + years completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. Sleep health was measured with the multidimensional RU_SATED scale, which assesses the dimensions of regularity, satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration. Insomnia was assessed with the Bergen Insomnia Scale. Data were analyzed with chi-square tests, t-tests, one-way ANOVAs, and regression analyses, as appropriate. Response rate was 33.5%.

Results: Sleep health was better in males, with increasing age, and with higher educational level, and was poorer in participants with evening preference and chronic insomnia, compared to their respective counterparts. When investigating the different sleep health dimensions, males scored better than females on satisfaction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.93), timing (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.88), and efficiency (aOR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.89). Older age was associated with better scores on regularity and satisfaction, whereas young age was associated with better scores on alertness and duration. High educational level was associated with better scores on alertness, timing, and duration. Evening types scored worse than morning types on regularity (aOR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.41), satisfaction (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.53), and timing (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.26 to 0.51). Participants with chronic insomnia scored worse than participants without insomnia on all six sleep health dimensions.

Conclusions: Sleep health differed significantly in relation to sex, age, education, circadian preference, and chronic insomnia. However, specific group differences were not equally evident in all sleep health dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A life of research on everyday sleep(iness). How openness and inquisitiveness led to a career as a sleep researcher and a broad contribution to sleep science. How did I come to sleep research and stay there? Looking beyond sleep duration in understanding obesity risk in adolescents: the role of circadian timing and misalignment on adolescent dietary outcomes, physical activity, and body mass index. The relationships between wanting to nap, actually napping, and depressed and anxious mood.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1