注意力不集中和社会期望的回应

W. Bradley McKibben, Paul J. Silvia
{"title":"注意力不集中和社会期望的回应","authors":"W. Bradley McKibben, Paul J. Silvia","doi":"10.1177/2150137815613135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers consistently have demonstrated the distorting effects that inattentive (responding without regard for survey content) and socially desirable (presenting one’s self in an overly positive way) responding can have on quantitative data. These threats to validity usually go undetected in counseling research, which is concerning given that counseling research often considers implications for practice and that research-based practice is in demand. In this article, the authors review practical approaches for detecting and addressing inattentive and socially desirable response tendencies in counseling research, thereby optimizing the validity of conclusions inferred from data.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"25 1","pages":"53 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inattentive and Socially Desirable Responding\",\"authors\":\"W. Bradley McKibben, Paul J. Silvia\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2150137815613135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers consistently have demonstrated the distorting effects that inattentive (responding without regard for survey content) and socially desirable (presenting one’s self in an overly positive way) responding can have on quantitative data. These threats to validity usually go undetected in counseling research, which is concerning given that counseling research often considers implications for practice and that research-based practice is in demand. In this article, the authors review practical approaches for detecting and addressing inattentive and socially desirable response tendencies in counseling research, thereby optimizing the validity of conclusions inferred from data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137815613135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137815613135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

研究人员不断证明,注意力不集中(不考虑调查内容的回答)和社会期望(以过于积极的方式展示自我)的回答会对定量数据产生扭曲效应。这些对有效性的威胁通常在咨询研究中未被发现,这是令人担忧的,因为咨询研究经常考虑对实践的影响,而基于研究的实践是有需求的。在本文中,作者回顾了在咨询研究中检测和解决注意力不集中和社会期望的反应倾向的实用方法,从而优化从数据推断的结论的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inattentive and Socially Desirable Responding
Researchers consistently have demonstrated the distorting effects that inattentive (responding without regard for survey content) and socially desirable (presenting one’s self in an overly positive way) responding can have on quantitative data. These threats to validity usually go undetected in counseling research, which is concerning given that counseling research often considers implications for practice and that research-based practice is in demand. In this article, the authors review practical approaches for detecting and addressing inattentive and socially desirable response tendencies in counseling research, thereby optimizing the validity of conclusions inferred from data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation
Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Emotion Focused Group Therapy Using Quality Indicators Scoping Review Methodology: A Practical Guide for Counseling Researchers Creating Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Counseling: Lessons Learned A Systematic Review of Data Analysis Decisions in Counseling Single-Case Research Designs to Inform Best Practices Effectiveness of DBT Partial Hospitalization Program for Adolescents and Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1