{"title":"进入新乌克兰文学和斯科沃罗达的钥匙(根据2022年9月23日在“哈尔科夫”文学和音乐节上发表的演讲“从斯科沃罗达到舍甫琴科”)","authors":"R. Chopyk","doi":"10.26565/2227-1864-2022-91-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The significance of G.Skovoroda for the formation of New Ukrainian literature was underestimated for a long time even by its leading figures (T.Shevchenko, P. Kulish). First of all, because of the “book language” of the writings of the wise man; the fact that most of them have not been published; and also active attempts by some Russian and pro-Russian figures (for example, A. Hashdeu) to appropriate it for Russian culture. The situation began to change after the publication of the full collection of G.Skovoroda's works, edited by D. Bagaliya (1894). A number of heuristic studies appeared (O. Rusov, S. Yefremov, M. Hrushevskyi, M. Plevako), but Stalin's repressions stopped further progress in this direction. Until it was restored by L. Ushkalov (\"Baroque Sources of New Ukrainian Literature\", \"Skovoroda and Ukraine\", etc.).\n\nThe aim of the article is to develop the work of the predecessors, enriching it with new own observations, like relation Skovorodynstvo (Skovoroda's philosophy) and the author of Natalka Poltavka, which is a \"variation on the theme of Skovoroda's 'Poor (Pious) Lark'\" (according to L. Ushkalov). The burlesque-travesty style of \"Aeneid\", which is a \"smart joke\" about non-kinship (the leitmotif of \"Fables of Kharkiv\"), corresponds to Skovoroda's outlook. This includes not only the direct influence of Skovoroda on the representatives of New Ukrainian literature, but also the painting style as a marker of their Ukrainian worldview (the starting impulse of T. Shevchenko’s poetic work at the time of the redemption from serfdom, when the realization of the painterly — kindred — potential was under threat) and, accordingly, anti-kinship — as an indicator of anti-Ukrainianism. For example, in late, already in crisis, M. Gogol, renounced himself (\"Selected places of correspondence with friends\").\n\nSkovorodynstvo sets the main development of the New Ukrainian literature, and therefore, the perspective of the study of the \"literature-centric\" Ukrainian national identity, the formation of which began with the \"Key to Everything: Know Yourself\" by the author of the book \"The Key to Everything: discover Yourself\".","PeriodicalId":33522,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enter to the New Ukrainian literature and the Skovoroda's key (according to the lecture-conversation \\\"From Skovoroda to Shevchenko\\\", presented at the literary and music festival \\\"Pyatiy Kharkiv\\\" on September 23, 2022)\",\"authors\":\"R. Chopyk\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2227-1864-2022-91-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The significance of G.Skovoroda for the formation of New Ukrainian literature was underestimated for a long time even by its leading figures (T.Shevchenko, P. Kulish). First of all, because of the “book language” of the writings of the wise man; the fact that most of them have not been published; and also active attempts by some Russian and pro-Russian figures (for example, A. Hashdeu) to appropriate it for Russian culture. The situation began to change after the publication of the full collection of G.Skovoroda's works, edited by D. Bagaliya (1894). A number of heuristic studies appeared (O. Rusov, S. Yefremov, M. Hrushevskyi, M. Plevako), but Stalin's repressions stopped further progress in this direction. Until it was restored by L. Ushkalov (\\\"Baroque Sources of New Ukrainian Literature\\\", \\\"Skovoroda and Ukraine\\\", etc.).\\n\\nThe aim of the article is to develop the work of the predecessors, enriching it with new own observations, like relation Skovorodynstvo (Skovoroda's philosophy) and the author of Natalka Poltavka, which is a \\\"variation on the theme of Skovoroda's 'Poor (Pious) Lark'\\\" (according to L. Ushkalov). The burlesque-travesty style of \\\"Aeneid\\\", which is a \\\"smart joke\\\" about non-kinship (the leitmotif of \\\"Fables of Kharkiv\\\"), corresponds to Skovoroda's outlook. This includes not only the direct influence of Skovoroda on the representatives of New Ukrainian literature, but also the painting style as a marker of their Ukrainian worldview (the starting impulse of T. Shevchenko’s poetic work at the time of the redemption from serfdom, when the realization of the painterly — kindred — potential was under threat) and, accordingly, anti-kinship — as an indicator of anti-Ukrainianism. For example, in late, already in crisis, M. Gogol, renounced himself (\\\"Selected places of correspondence with friends\\\").\\n\\nSkovorodynstvo sets the main development of the New Ukrainian literature, and therefore, the perspective of the study of the \\\"literature-centric\\\" Ukrainian national identity, the formation of which began with the \\\"Key to Everything: Know Yourself\\\" by the author of the book \\\"The Key to Everything: discover Yourself\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":33522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2022-91-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2227-1864-2022-91-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在很长一段时间里,即使是乌克兰新文学的领军人物(t .舍甫琴科,P.库利什)也低估了G.Skovoroda对新文学形成的重要性。首先,因为智者著作的“书语”;事实上,他们中的大多数都没有发表;一些俄罗斯和亲俄人物(如A. Hashdeu)也积极尝试将其用于俄罗斯文化。在D. Bagaliya编辑的G.Skovoroda全集(1894)出版后,情况开始发生变化。一些启发式的研究出现了(O. Rusov, S. Yefremov, M. hrushhevskyi, M. Plevako),但是斯大林的镇压阻止了这个方向的进一步发展。直到它被L. Ushkalov(“新乌克兰文学的巴洛克来源”,“Skovoroda和乌克兰”等)修复。这篇文章的目的是发展前人的工作,用新的自己的观察来丰富它,比如关系Skovorodynstvo (Skovoroda的哲学)和Natalka Poltavka的作者,这是“Skovoroda' Poor (Pious) Lark'主题的变化”(根据L. Ushkalov)。《埃涅伊德》的滑稽嘲弄风格,是一个关于非亲属关系的“聪明的玩笑”(《哈尔科夫寓言》的主题),与斯科沃罗达的观点相一致。这不仅包括斯科沃罗达对新乌克兰文学代表的直接影响,还包括作为他们乌克兰世界观标志的绘画风格(T.舍甫琴科诗歌作品的起始冲动是在农奴制的救赎时期,当绘画的亲属潜力的实现受到威胁时),以及作为反乌克兰主义指标的反亲属主义。例如,在已经陷入危机的晚期,果戈理宣布放弃了自己(《与朋友通信的选定地点》)。Skovorodynstvo设置了新乌克兰文学的主要发展,因此,研究“文学中心”乌克兰民族认同的视角,其形成始于“一切的关键:认识你自己”一书的作者“一切的关键:发现你自己”。
Enter to the New Ukrainian literature and the Skovoroda's key (according to the lecture-conversation "From Skovoroda to Shevchenko", presented at the literary and music festival "Pyatiy Kharkiv" on September 23, 2022)
The significance of G.Skovoroda for the formation of New Ukrainian literature was underestimated for a long time even by its leading figures (T.Shevchenko, P. Kulish). First of all, because of the “book language” of the writings of the wise man; the fact that most of them have not been published; and also active attempts by some Russian and pro-Russian figures (for example, A. Hashdeu) to appropriate it for Russian culture. The situation began to change after the publication of the full collection of G.Skovoroda's works, edited by D. Bagaliya (1894). A number of heuristic studies appeared (O. Rusov, S. Yefremov, M. Hrushevskyi, M. Plevako), but Stalin's repressions stopped further progress in this direction. Until it was restored by L. Ushkalov ("Baroque Sources of New Ukrainian Literature", "Skovoroda and Ukraine", etc.).
The aim of the article is to develop the work of the predecessors, enriching it with new own observations, like relation Skovorodynstvo (Skovoroda's philosophy) and the author of Natalka Poltavka, which is a "variation on the theme of Skovoroda's 'Poor (Pious) Lark'" (according to L. Ushkalov). The burlesque-travesty style of "Aeneid", which is a "smart joke" about non-kinship (the leitmotif of "Fables of Kharkiv"), corresponds to Skovoroda's outlook. This includes not only the direct influence of Skovoroda on the representatives of New Ukrainian literature, but also the painting style as a marker of their Ukrainian worldview (the starting impulse of T. Shevchenko’s poetic work at the time of the redemption from serfdom, when the realization of the painterly — kindred — potential was under threat) and, accordingly, anti-kinship — as an indicator of anti-Ukrainianism. For example, in late, already in crisis, M. Gogol, renounced himself ("Selected places of correspondence with friends").
Skovorodynstvo sets the main development of the New Ukrainian literature, and therefore, the perspective of the study of the "literature-centric" Ukrainian national identity, the formation of which began with the "Key to Everything: Know Yourself" by the author of the book "The Key to Everything: discover Yourself".