伊拉克市场法莫替丁片不同产品质量控制研究

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Vitae Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n1a347467
Nizar Jassem
{"title":"伊拉克市场法莫替丁片不同产品质量控制研究","authors":"Nizar Jassem","doi":"10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n1a347467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In developing countries, particularly in Iraq, the use of generic medicines has been increasing in recent years, primarily as a cost-saving measure in healthcare provision. In the Iraqi market, famotidine tablets are available from different pharmaceutical companies. As a result, regular pre-marketing quality testing is required to check the quality and identify which product might safely substitute the innovator product in the event of the innovator brand's unavailability or high cost.\nObjective: various quality control tests have been conducted to determine the Pharmaceutical Equivalence of the different generic and brands of Famotidine film-coated tablets marketed in Iraq.\nMaterials and Methods: Four different samples of the most commonly available Famotidine 20 mg tablets in the Iraqi market were tested for drug contents, friability, and hardness. Additionally, the in-vitro drug release and kinetics were evaluated.\nResults: slight differences in the products’ content were found; however, they were within the acceptable requirement of British Pharmacopeia (BP) and The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) 30, NF 25. Similarly, the friability and hardness were within the excellent range according to the B.P. and USP. The results of our study indicated that the tested brand (Famodin) and the three generic products (Famosam, Ulceran, and Famodar) of Famotidine tablets have a unique pattern of in-vitro release profiles. However, all the tested brands and generic pills complied with the USP specifications for the immediate release dosage forms except for Famosam. Release kinetic for the four tested products indicates first-order kinetic models.\nConclusion: The findings revealed that nearly all of the tested Famotidine tablet brands and generics met the pharmacopeial requirements for oral tablets. As a result, if acquiring the innovative brand of famotidine tablets is difficult to obtain, healthcare providers may be advised to use the tested products instead.","PeriodicalId":51213,"journal":{"name":"Vitae","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Control Study of Different Products from Famotidine Tablets in the Iraqi Market\",\"authors\":\"Nizar Jassem\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n1a347467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In developing countries, particularly in Iraq, the use of generic medicines has been increasing in recent years, primarily as a cost-saving measure in healthcare provision. In the Iraqi market, famotidine tablets are available from different pharmaceutical companies. As a result, regular pre-marketing quality testing is required to check the quality and identify which product might safely substitute the innovator product in the event of the innovator brand's unavailability or high cost.\\nObjective: various quality control tests have been conducted to determine the Pharmaceutical Equivalence of the different generic and brands of Famotidine film-coated tablets marketed in Iraq.\\nMaterials and Methods: Four different samples of the most commonly available Famotidine 20 mg tablets in the Iraqi market were tested for drug contents, friability, and hardness. Additionally, the in-vitro drug release and kinetics were evaluated.\\nResults: slight differences in the products’ content were found; however, they were within the acceptable requirement of British Pharmacopeia (BP) and The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) 30, NF 25. Similarly, the friability and hardness were within the excellent range according to the B.P. and USP. The results of our study indicated that the tested brand (Famodin) and the three generic products (Famosam, Ulceran, and Famodar) of Famotidine tablets have a unique pattern of in-vitro release profiles. However, all the tested brands and generic pills complied with the USP specifications for the immediate release dosage forms except for Famosam. Release kinetic for the four tested products indicates first-order kinetic models.\\nConclusion: The findings revealed that nearly all of the tested Famotidine tablet brands and generics met the pharmacopeial requirements for oral tablets. As a result, if acquiring the innovative brand of famotidine tablets is difficult to obtain, healthcare providers may be advised to use the tested products instead.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vitae\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vitae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n1a347467\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vitae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.vitae.v29n1a347467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在发展中国家,特别是在伊拉克,近年来仿制药的使用一直在增加,主要是作为提供保健服务的一种节省成本的措施。在伊拉克市场上,法莫替丁片剂可从不同的制药公司获得。因此,需要定期的上市前质量测试来检查质量,并确定在创新品牌不可用或成本高的情况下,哪些产品可以安全替代创新产品。目的:进行了各种质量控制试验,以确定在伊拉克销售的不同仿制和品牌法莫替丁薄膜包衣片的药物等效性。材料和方法:对伊拉克市场上最常见的法莫替丁20毫克片剂的四种不同样品进行了药物含量、易碎性和硬度测试。此外,还评估了体外药物释放和动力学。结果:产品含量略有差异;然而,它们在英国药典(BP)和美国药典(USP) 30, NF 25的可接受要求范围内。同样,根据B.P.和USP,脆性和硬度均在优良范围内。本研究结果表明,法莫替丁片的受试品牌(法莫丁)和三种仿制产品(法莫替丁、Ulceran和法莫达)具有独特的体外释放规律。然而,除Famosam外,所有被测试的品牌和仿制药均符合USP关于立即释放剂型的规范。四种被试产品的释放动力学为一级动力学模型。结论:检测的法莫替丁片品牌和仿制药几乎全部符合口服片剂药典要求。因此,如果难以获得创新品牌的法莫替丁片剂,则可能建议医疗保健提供者使用经测试的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality Control Study of Different Products from Famotidine Tablets in the Iraqi Market
Background: In developing countries, particularly in Iraq, the use of generic medicines has been increasing in recent years, primarily as a cost-saving measure in healthcare provision. In the Iraqi market, famotidine tablets are available from different pharmaceutical companies. As a result, regular pre-marketing quality testing is required to check the quality and identify which product might safely substitute the innovator product in the event of the innovator brand's unavailability or high cost. Objective: various quality control tests have been conducted to determine the Pharmaceutical Equivalence of the different generic and brands of Famotidine film-coated tablets marketed in Iraq. Materials and Methods: Four different samples of the most commonly available Famotidine 20 mg tablets in the Iraqi market were tested for drug contents, friability, and hardness. Additionally, the in-vitro drug release and kinetics were evaluated. Results: slight differences in the products’ content were found; however, they were within the acceptable requirement of British Pharmacopeia (BP) and The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP) 30, NF 25. Similarly, the friability and hardness were within the excellent range according to the B.P. and USP. The results of our study indicated that the tested brand (Famodin) and the three generic products (Famosam, Ulceran, and Famodar) of Famotidine tablets have a unique pattern of in-vitro release profiles. However, all the tested brands and generic pills complied with the USP specifications for the immediate release dosage forms except for Famosam. Release kinetic for the four tested products indicates first-order kinetic models. Conclusion: The findings revealed that nearly all of the tested Famotidine tablet brands and generics met the pharmacopeial requirements for oral tablets. As a result, if acquiring the innovative brand of famotidine tablets is difficult to obtain, healthcare providers may be advised to use the tested products instead.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vitae
Vitae PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal VITAE is the four-monthly official publication of the School of Pharmaceutical and Food Sciences, and its mission is the diffusion of the scientific and investigative knowledge in the various fields of pharmaceutical and food research, and their related industries. The Journal VITAE is an open-access journal that publishes original and unpublished manuscripts, which are selected by the Editorial Board and then peer-reviewed. The editorial pages express the opinion of the Faculty regarding the various topics of interest. The judgments, opinions, and points of view expressed in the published articles are the responsibility of their authors.
期刊最新文献
Séptimo Congreso Colombiano De Atención Farmacéutica – Encuentro Iberoamericano De Farmacia Hospitalaria Conductual: “Servicios Profesionales Farmacéuticos y Satisfacción de Necesidades de Pacientes y Sistemas De Salud” Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of a traditionally fermented corn product: "Champús" Characterization of decontamination procedure of beef carcasses at slaughterhouses in the province of Antioquia, Colombia Analysis of drying kinetic of brewer´s spent grains: effect of the temperature on the physical properties and the content of bioactive compounds Preparation of a probiotic quinoa beverage by enzymatic hydrolysis of its starches and subsequent lactic acid fermentation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1