分析不同来源证据的一致性程度

FU Chao , YANG Shan-lin , LUO He
{"title":"分析不同来源证据的一致性程度","authors":"FU Chao ,&nbsp;YANG Shan-lin ,&nbsp;LUO He","doi":"10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60044-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In view of the study on the conflict degree among the evidence from different sources made by Weiru Liu, this article improves his analysis by coming up with the analysis of consistency degree among the evidence. In this research, the conflict and the harmony in the analysis of the degree of conflict (ADCF) are developed into the consistency, the conflict, the nonconflict and inconsistency in the analysis of the degree of consistency (ADCS). On this basis, the general mathematical and practical expressions of the consistency degree are proposed by resorting to the mass of the combined belief assigned to the empty-set before the normalization and the distance between betting commitments of evidence, and the impact of the consistency degree on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule is analyzed. The representative numerical examples and the comparison of the ADCF with the ADCS demonstrate that the ADCS provides a strongly robust and reasonable indicator on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101206,"journal":{"name":"Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60044-0","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the Degree of Consistency among Evidence from Different Sources\",\"authors\":\"FU Chao ,&nbsp;YANG Shan-lin ,&nbsp;LUO He\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60044-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In view of the study on the conflict degree among the evidence from different sources made by Weiru Liu, this article improves his analysis by coming up with the analysis of consistency degree among the evidence. In this research, the conflict and the harmony in the analysis of the degree of conflict (ADCF) are developed into the consistency, the conflict, the nonconflict and inconsistency in the analysis of the degree of consistency (ADCS). On this basis, the general mathematical and practical expressions of the consistency degree are proposed by resorting to the mass of the combined belief assigned to the empty-set before the normalization and the distance between betting commitments of evidence, and the impact of the consistency degree on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule is analyzed. The representative numerical examples and the comparison of the ADCF with the ADCS demonstrate that the ADCS provides a strongly robust and reasonable indicator on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 166-174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60044-0\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874865110600440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874865110600440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

针对刘伟如对不同来源证据之间冲突程度的研究,本文提出证据之间的一致性分析,对其分析进行改进。本研究将冲突程度分析中的冲突与和谐发展为一致程度分析中的一致性、冲突性、非冲突性和不一致性。在此基础上,利用归一化前赋给空集的组合信念的质量和证据投注承诺之间的距离,提出了一致性度的一般数学和实用表达式,并分析了一致性度对Dempster组合规则适用性的影响。具有代表性的数值算例以及ADCF与ADCS的比较表明,ADCS对Dempster组合规则的适用性提供了较强的鲁棒性和合理性指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyzing the Degree of Consistency among Evidence from Different Sources

In view of the study on the conflict degree among the evidence from different sources made by Weiru Liu, this article improves his analysis by coming up with the analysis of consistency degree among the evidence. In this research, the conflict and the harmony in the analysis of the degree of conflict (ADCF) are developed into the consistency, the conflict, the nonconflict and inconsistency in the analysis of the degree of consistency (ADCS). On this basis, the general mathematical and practical expressions of the consistency degree are proposed by resorting to the mass of the combined belief assigned to the empty-set before the normalization and the distance between betting commitments of evidence, and the impact of the consistency degree on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule is analyzed. The representative numerical examples and the comparison of the ADCF with the ADCS demonstrate that the ADCS provides a strongly robust and reasonable indicator on the applicability of Dempster's combination rule.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Information technology and systems Book review editorial Book review editorial A combined forecasting method integrating contextual knowledge Personal Credit Risk Measurement: Bilateral Antibody Artificial Immune Probability Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1