递归贝叶斯状态估计中基于历史的停止准则

Y. Marghi, Aziz Koçanaoğulları, M. Akçakaya, Deniz Erdoğmuş
{"title":"递归贝叶斯状态估计中基于历史的停止准则","authors":"Y. Marghi, Aziz Koçanaoğulları, M. Akçakaya, Deniz Erdoğmuş","doi":"10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In dynamic state-space models, the state can be estimated through recursive computation of the posterior distribution of the state given all measurements. In scenarios where active sensing/querying is possible, a hard decision is made when the state posterior achieves a pre-set confidence threshold. This mandate to meet a hard threshold may sometimes unnecessarily require more queries. In application domains where sensing/querying cost is of concern, some potential accuracy may be sacrificed for greater gains in sensing cost. In this paper, we (a) propose a criterion based on a linear combination of state posterior and its changes, (b) show that for discrete-valued state estimation scenarios the proposed objective is more likely to sort correct and incorrect estimates appropriately compared to just looking at the posterior, and finally (c) demonstrate that the method can lead to significant human intent estimation speed increase without significant loss of accuracy in a brain-computer interface application.","PeriodicalId":13203,"journal":{"name":"ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)","volume":"86 1","pages":"3362-3366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A History-based Stopping Criterion in Recursive Bayesian State Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Y. Marghi, Aziz Koçanaoğulları, M. Akçakaya, Deniz Erdoğmuş\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In dynamic state-space models, the state can be estimated through recursive computation of the posterior distribution of the state given all measurements. In scenarios where active sensing/querying is possible, a hard decision is made when the state posterior achieves a pre-set confidence threshold. This mandate to meet a hard threshold may sometimes unnecessarily require more queries. In application domains where sensing/querying cost is of concern, some potential accuracy may be sacrificed for greater gains in sensing cost. In this paper, we (a) propose a criterion based on a linear combination of state posterior and its changes, (b) show that for discrete-valued state estimation scenarios the proposed objective is more likely to sort correct and incorrect estimates appropriately compared to just looking at the posterior, and finally (c) demonstrate that the method can lead to significant human intent estimation speed increase without significant loss of accuracy in a brain-computer interface application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"3362-3366\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在动态状态空间模型中,可以通过递归计算给定所有测量值的状态后验分布来估计状态。在可能进行主动感知/查询的场景中,当状态后验达到预设的置信度阈值时,就会做出艰难的决策。这种满足硬阈值的要求有时可能不必要地需要更多查询。在关注传感/查询成本的应用领域中,为了获得更大的传感成本收益,可能会牺牲一些潜在的准确性。在本文中,我们(a)提出了一个基于状态后验及其变化的线性组合的准则,(b)表明,对于离散值状态估计场景,与只看后验相比,所提出的目标更有可能适当地对正确和不正确的估计进行分类,最后(c)证明该方法可以在脑机接口应用中显著提高人类意图估计速度,而不会显著降低准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A History-based Stopping Criterion in Recursive Bayesian State Estimation
In dynamic state-space models, the state can be estimated through recursive computation of the posterior distribution of the state given all measurements. In scenarios where active sensing/querying is possible, a hard decision is made when the state posterior achieves a pre-set confidence threshold. This mandate to meet a hard threshold may sometimes unnecessarily require more queries. In application domains where sensing/querying cost is of concern, some potential accuracy may be sacrificed for greater gains in sensing cost. In this paper, we (a) propose a criterion based on a linear combination of state posterior and its changes, (b) show that for discrete-valued state estimation scenarios the proposed objective is more likely to sort correct and incorrect estimates appropriately compared to just looking at the posterior, and finally (c) demonstrate that the method can lead to significant human intent estimation speed increase without significant loss of accuracy in a brain-computer interface application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Universal Acoustic Modeling Using Neural Mixture Models Speech Landmark Bigrams for Depression Detection from Naturalistic Smartphone Speech Robust M-estimation Based Matrix Completion When Can a System of Subnetworks Be Registered Uniquely? Learning Search Path for Region-level Image Matching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1