PS7-60:乳腺腺鳞癌:一项基于SEER数据库的人群研究

Zhangyuan Gu, Juan Liu, Xiaoyan Lin, Cheng Wang, Jiejing Li, Yun Fu, Xiaolin Cheng, Cheng Xu, Zhigang Zhuang
{"title":"PS7-60:乳腺腺鳞癌:一项基于SEER数据库的人群研究","authors":"Zhangyuan Gu, Juan Liu, Xiaoyan Lin, Cheng Wang, Jiejing Li, Yun Fu, Xiaolin Cheng, Cheng Xu, Zhigang Zhuang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-50772/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background: The present study is aimed at summarizing the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and management of breast adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC). Methods: A population-based study was performed using retrospectively extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database for breast cancer patients with histological diagnoses of ASC, infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 2004 to 2016. End-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to minimize selection bias of baseline characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used for identifying valuable prognostic factors. Results: ASC presented similar tumor size but low histological grade and less lymph node metastasis compared to IDC. ASC expressed less positive rate of hormone receptors and barely HER2, which was similar with SCC (estrogen receptor (ER): ASC 27.74% and SCC 21.53%, progesterone receptor (PR): ASC 18.06% and SCC 12.85%, HER2: ASC 4.44% and SCC 7.53%). ASC patients underwent the same treatment as IDC (chemotherapy 36.99% vs. 41.86%, BCS 50.58% vs 52.83%, P >0.05), only with less radiotherapy (39.88% vs. 48.34%, P<0.05). Median follow-up data of 78 months showed that the prognosis of IDC patients was better than that of ASC patients (all P <0.05 for BCSM and OS). After adjustment for clinicopathological and therapeutic factors in Cox proportional hazards models, ASC was no longer an independent poor prognosis factor. In matched groups, no significant difference in BCSM nor OS was observed between ASC and IDC groups. In HR-negative patients, the prognosis of ASC was similar with that of IDC, and both were superior to SCC. In HR-positive patients, the five-year survival rate of ASC was only about 60%, which was far less than that in ASC of HR-negative, the poor prognosis of ASC was closer to that of SCC. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (age≥60) and advanced AJCC stage (III and IV) were independent factors of poor prognosis in ASC, breast-conserving surgery was also ideally suited for ASC. Conclusions: ASC has unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. To improve the clinical and biological understanding of ASC can make breast cancer patients get more individualized treatment.","PeriodicalId":20307,"journal":{"name":"Poster Session Abstracts","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract PS7-60: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast: A population-based study using the SEER database\",\"authors\":\"Zhangyuan Gu, Juan Liu, Xiaoyan Lin, Cheng Wang, Jiejing Li, Yun Fu, Xiaolin Cheng, Cheng Xu, Zhigang Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-50772/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Background: The present study is aimed at summarizing the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and management of breast adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC). Methods: A population-based study was performed using retrospectively extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database for breast cancer patients with histological diagnoses of ASC, infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 2004 to 2016. End-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to minimize selection bias of baseline characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used for identifying valuable prognostic factors. Results: ASC presented similar tumor size but low histological grade and less lymph node metastasis compared to IDC. ASC expressed less positive rate of hormone receptors and barely HER2, which was similar with SCC (estrogen receptor (ER): ASC 27.74% and SCC 21.53%, progesterone receptor (PR): ASC 18.06% and SCC 12.85%, HER2: ASC 4.44% and SCC 7.53%). ASC patients underwent the same treatment as IDC (chemotherapy 36.99% vs. 41.86%, BCS 50.58% vs 52.83%, P >0.05), only with less radiotherapy (39.88% vs. 48.34%, P<0.05). Median follow-up data of 78 months showed that the prognosis of IDC patients was better than that of ASC patients (all P <0.05 for BCSM and OS). After adjustment for clinicopathological and therapeutic factors in Cox proportional hazards models, ASC was no longer an independent poor prognosis factor. In matched groups, no significant difference in BCSM nor OS was observed between ASC and IDC groups. In HR-negative patients, the prognosis of ASC was similar with that of IDC, and both were superior to SCC. In HR-positive patients, the five-year survival rate of ASC was only about 60%, which was far less than that in ASC of HR-negative, the poor prognosis of ASC was closer to that of SCC. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (age≥60) and advanced AJCC stage (III and IV) were independent factors of poor prognosis in ASC, breast-conserving surgery was also ideally suited for ASC. Conclusions: ASC has unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. To improve the clinical and biological understanding of ASC can make breast cancer patients get more individualized treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Poster Session Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-50772/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poster Session Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-50772/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在总结乳腺腺鳞癌(ASC)的临床病理特点、预后和治疗。方法:回顾性提取2004年至2016年组织学诊断为ASC、浸润导管癌(IDC)和鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的乳腺癌监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中的数据,开展基于人群的研究。终点为总生存期(OS)和乳腺癌特异性死亡率(BCSM)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)最小化基线特征的选择偏差。单变量和多变量分析用于识别有价值的预后因素。结果:与IDC相比,ASC肿瘤大小相近,但组织学分级低,淋巴结转移少。ASC的激素受体阳性率较低,HER2阳性率较低,与SCC相似(雌激素受体(ER): ASC 27.74%和SCC 21.53%,孕激素受体(PR): ASC 18.06%和SCC 12.85%, HER2: ASC 4.44%和SCC 7.53%)。ASC患者接受与IDC相同的治疗(化疗36.99%比41.86%,BCS 50.58%比52.83%,P >0.05),只是放疗较少(39.88%比48.34%,P<0.05)。中位随访78个月,IDC患者预后优于ASC患者(BCSM和OS均P <0.05)。在Cox比例风险模型中调整临床病理和治疗因素后,ASC不再是一个独立的不良预后因素。在匹配组中,ASC组与IDC组间BCSM和OS无显著差异。在hr阴性患者中,ASC与IDC的预后相似,均优于SCC。在hr阳性患者中,ASC的5年生存率仅为60%左右,远低于hr阴性的ASC, ASC的不良预后更接近于SCC。多因素分析显示,高龄(≥60岁)和AJCC晚期(III期和IV期)是影响ASC预后不良的独立因素,保乳手术也是ASC的理想选择。结论:ASC具有独特的临床病理特征和预后。提高对ASC的临床和生物学认识,可以使乳腺癌患者得到更个体化的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract PS7-60: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast: A population-based study using the SEER database
Background: The present study is aimed at summarizing the clinicopathological characteristics, prognosis, and management of breast adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC). Methods: A population-based study was performed using retrospectively extracted data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database for breast cancer patients with histological diagnoses of ASC, infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) from 2004 to 2016. End-points were overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was employed to minimize selection bias of baseline characteristics. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used for identifying valuable prognostic factors. Results: ASC presented similar tumor size but low histological grade and less lymph node metastasis compared to IDC. ASC expressed less positive rate of hormone receptors and barely HER2, which was similar with SCC (estrogen receptor (ER): ASC 27.74% and SCC 21.53%, progesterone receptor (PR): ASC 18.06% and SCC 12.85%, HER2: ASC 4.44% and SCC 7.53%). ASC patients underwent the same treatment as IDC (chemotherapy 36.99% vs. 41.86%, BCS 50.58% vs 52.83%, P >0.05), only with less radiotherapy (39.88% vs. 48.34%, P<0.05). Median follow-up data of 78 months showed that the prognosis of IDC patients was better than that of ASC patients (all P <0.05 for BCSM and OS). After adjustment for clinicopathological and therapeutic factors in Cox proportional hazards models, ASC was no longer an independent poor prognosis factor. In matched groups, no significant difference in BCSM nor OS was observed between ASC and IDC groups. In HR-negative patients, the prognosis of ASC was similar with that of IDC, and both were superior to SCC. In HR-positive patients, the five-year survival rate of ASC was only about 60%, which was far less than that in ASC of HR-negative, the poor prognosis of ASC was closer to that of SCC. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (age≥60) and advanced AJCC stage (III and IV) were independent factors of poor prognosis in ASC, breast-conserving surgery was also ideally suited for ASC. Conclusions: ASC has unique clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. To improve the clinical and biological understanding of ASC can make breast cancer patients get more individualized treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstract PS6-01: How low is low risk: MINDACT updated outcome and treatment benefit in patients considered clinical low risk and stratified by genomic signature, age and nodal status Abstract PS14-01: Radium-223 in women with HR-positive bone-metastatic breast cancer receiving endocrine therapy: International phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Abstract PS6-25: Cts5 tested in a Brazilian population: A tool that can predict global survival in early breast cancer ER+/HER2-, as well as the response to extended endocrine therapy Abstract PS1-32: A multicentre prospective feasibility study of carbon dye tattooing of biopsied axillary node and surgical localisation in breast cancer patients Abstract PS12-09: Pre-operative pembrolizumab (Pembro) with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1